Necessity of the CLF–CBF compatibility assumption for safe stabilization via the Zubov–HJB PDE framework
Determine whether the compatibility assumption—requiring that for every state x in the boundary layer {x ∈ R^n : 1 − ε ≤ h(x) < 1} there exists a control input u such that simultaneously (i) ⟨ζ, f(x)+g(x)u⟩ < −w_ε(x) for all proximal subgradients ζ ∈ ∂_P v(x) of a control Lyapunov function v, and (ii) ⟨ξ, f(x)+g(x)u⟩ ≤ α(1 − h(x)) for all proximal subgradients ξ ∈ ∂_P h(x) of the safe-set function h—is necessary for the existence of a control Lyapunov–barrier function produced by the Zubov–HJB PDE characterization that guarantees safe stabilization to the origin while avoiding the unsafe set U.
References
While this assumption is standard and no constructive counterexample is known, its necessity remains open.
— Characterization of Safe Stabilization and Control Lyapunov-Barrier Functions via Zubov Equation Formulation
(2604.00941 - Meng et al., 1 Apr 2026) in Conclusion