Robustness of width-fitting without pre-peak data

Ascertain whether the DES reference-curve fitting method that estimates each Type Ia supernova light-curve width by chi-square minimization against a stacked, de-redshifted reference light curve yields unbiased and reliable results when the target light curve lacks pre-peak photometric observations, and quantify any bias or increased uncertainty relative to fits that include pre-peak data.

Background

The paper measures cosmological time dilation using Type Ia supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey by constructing stacked reference light curves matched in rest-frame wavelength and fitting individual supernova light curves via a width parameter. While most supernovae have multi-band coverage, some light curves may lack pre-peak observations, which could affect the accuracy of width estimation and, consequently, the inferred time-dilation signal.

The authors performed a test requiring pre-peak observations and found minimal numerical impact on the fitted exponent b, but they note that this reduction in sample size does not allow a definitive assessment of robustness without pre-peak data. They suggest that future analyses could artificially remove pre-peak data to directly test for bias and stability of the method under such conditions.

References

This reduction does not let us conclusively say if this method is robust at fitting light curves without pre-peak data, and future analyses may look at purposefully degrading the dataset (e.g. by manually removing pre-peak data) to investigate this.