New upper bounds for the constants in the Bohnenblust-Hille inequality
Abstract: A classical inequality due to Bohnenblust and Hille states that for every positive integer $m$ there is a constant $C_{m}>0$ so that $$(\sum\limits_{i_{1},...,i_{m}=1}{N}|U(e_{i_{{1}}},...,e_{i_{m}})| {\frac{2m}{m+1}}) {\frac{m+1}{2m}}\leq C_{m}| U|$$ for every positive integer $N$ and every $m$-linear mapping $U:\ell_{\infty}{N}\times...\times\ell_{\infty}{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$, where $C_{m}=m{\frac{m+1}{2m}}2{\frac{m-1}{2}}.$ The value of $C_{m}$ was improved to $C_{m}=2{\frac{m-1}{2}}$ by S. Kaijser and more recently H. Qu\'{e}ffelec and A. Defant and P. Sevilla-Peris remarked that $C_{m}=(\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}){m-1}$ also works. The Bohnenblust--Hille inequality also holds for real Banach spaces with the constants $C_{m}=2{\frac{m-1}{2}}$. In this note we show that a recent new proof of the Bohnenblust--Hille inequality (due to Defant, Popa and Schwarting) provides, in fact, quite better estimates for $C_{m}$ for all values of $m \in \mathbb{N}$. In particular, we will also show that, for real scalars, if $m$ is even with $2\leq m\leq 24$, then $$C_{\mathbb{R},m}=2{1/2}C_{\mathbb{R},m/2}.$$ We will mainly work on a paper by Defant, Popa and Schwarting, giving some remarks about their work and explaining how to, numerically, improve the previously mentioned constants.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.