Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Spitzer observations of supernova remnants: II. Physical conditions and comparison with HH7 and HH54

Published 30 Oct 2010 in astro-ph.SR | (1011.0052v1)

Abstract: We have studied the shock-excited molecular regions associated with four supernova remnants (SNRs) - IC443C, W28, W44 and 3C391 - and two Herbig-Haro objects, HH7 and HH54, using Spitzer's Infrared Spectrograph (IRS). The physical conditions within the observed areas are inferred from spectroscopic data obtained from IRS and from SWS and LWS onboard ISO, together with photometric data from Spitzer's Infrared Array Camera (IRAC). Adopting a power-law distribution for the gas temperature in the observed region, the H2 S(0) to S(7) spectral line maps obtained with IRS were used to constrain the gas density, yielding estimated n(H2) in the range 2-4*103 cm-3. The excitation of H2 S(9) to S(12) and high-J CO pure rotational lines, however, require environments several times denser. The inconsistency among the best-fit densities estimated from different species can be explained by density fluctuations within the observed regions. The best-fit power-law index b is smaller than the value 3.8 predicted for a paraboloidal C-type bow shock, suggesting that the shock front has a "flatter" shape than that of a paraboloid. The best-fit parameters for SNRs and Herbig-Haro objects do not differ significantly between the two classes of sources, except that for the SNRs the ortho-to-para ratio (OPR) of hot gas (T> 1000 K) is close to the LTE value 3, while for HH7 and HH54 even the hottest gas exhibits an OPR smaller than 3. Finally, we mapped the physical parameters within the regions observed with IRS and found that the mid-lying H2 emissions - S(3) to S(5) - tend to trace the hot component of the gas, while the intensities of S(6) and S(7) are more sensitive to the density of the gas compared to S(3) to S(5).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.