When is a family of generalized means a scale?
Abstract: For a family {k_t | t \in I} of real C2 functions defined on U (I, U -- open intervals) and satisfying some mild regularity conditions, we prove that the mapping I \ni t --> k_t{-1}(\sum_{i=1}n w_i k_t(a_i)) is a continuous bijection between I and (min a, max a), for every fixed non-constant sequence a = (a_i){i=1}n with values in U and every set, of the same cardinality, of positive weights w=(w_i){i=1}n. In such a situation one says that the family of functions {k_t} generates a scale on U. The precise assumptions in our result read (all indicated derivatives are with respect to x \in U) (i) k'_t does not vanish anywhere in U for every t \in I, (ii) I \ni t \mapsto \frac{k"_t(x)}{k'_t(x)} is increasing, 1--1 on a dense subset of U and onto the image R for every x \in U. This result makes possible few new things as well as new proofs of classical results.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.