Decorated proofs for computational effects: States

Published 11 Dec 2011 in cs.PL, cs.LO, and math.CT | (1112.2396v3)

Abstract: The syntax of an imperative language does not mention explicitly the state, while its denotational semantics has to mention it. In this paper we show that the equational proofs about an imperative language may hide the state, in the same way as the syntax does.

Abstract PDF Upgrade to Chat

Citations (18)

View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Top Community Prompts

Explain it Like I'm 14

Practical Applications

Conceptual Simplification

Sign Up to Activate View All Prompts

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (4)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.