Banach spaces with no proximinal subspaces of codimension 2
Abstract: The classical theorem of Bishop-Phelps asserts that, for a Banach space X, the norm-achieving functionals in X* are dense in X*. Bela Bollobas's extension of the theorem gives a quantitative description of just how dense the norm-achieving functionals have to be: if (x,f) is in X x X* with ||x||=||f||=1 and |1-f(x)|< h2/4 then there are (x',f') in X x X* with ||x'||= ||f'||=1, ||x-x'||, ||f-f'||< h and f'(x')=1. This means that there are always "proximinal" hyperplanes H in X (a nonempty subset E of a metric space is said to be "proximinal" if, for x not in E, the distance d(x,E) is always achieved - there is always an e in E with d(x,E)=d(x,e)); for if H= ker f (f in X*) then it is easy to see that H is proximinal if and only if f is norm-achieving. Indeed the set of proximinal hyperplanes H is, in the appropriate sense, dense in the set of all closed hyperplanes H in X. Quite a long time ago [Problem 2.1 in his monograph "The Theory of Best approximation and Functional Analysis" Regional Conference series in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, 1974], Ivan Singer asked if this result generalized to closed subspaces of finite codimension - if every Banach space has a proximinal subspace of codimension 2, for example. In this paper I show that there is a Banach space X such that X has no proximinal subspace of finite codimension n>1. So we have a converse to Bishop-Phelps-Bollobas: a dense set of proximinal hyperplanes can always be found, but proximinal subspaces of larger, finite codimension need not be.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.