Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

An intuitionistic version of Ramsey Theorem (italian version)

Published 11 Jan 2014 in cs.LO | (1401.2515v1)

Abstract: Ramsey Theorem [6] for pairs is intuitionistically but not classically provable: it is equivalent to a subclassical principle [2]. In this note we show that Ramsey may be restated in an intuitionistically provable form, which is informative (or at least without negations), and classically equivalent to the original. With respect to previous works of the same kind, we do not use no counterexample as in [1], [5], nor we add a new principle to the intuitionism as in [4]. We claim that this intuitionistic version of Ramsey could be use to replace Ramsey Theorem in the convergence proof of programs included in [3]. [1] Gianluigi Bellin. Ramsey interpreted: a parametric version of Ramsey Theorem. In AMS, editor, Logic and Computation: Proceedings of a Symposium held at Carnegie Mellon University, volume 106. [2] Stefano Berardi, Silvia Steila, Ramsey Theorem for pairs as a classical principle in Intuitionistic Arithmetic, Submitted to the proceedings of Types 2013 in Toulouse. [3] Byron Cook, Abigail See, Florian Zuleger, Ramsey vs. Lexicographic Termination Proving, LNCS 7795, 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [4] Thierry Coquand. A direct proof of Ramsey Theorem. [5] Paulo Oliva and Thomas Powell. A Constructive Interpretation of Ramsey Theorem via the Product of Selection Functions. CoRR, arXiv:1204.5631, 2012. [6] F. P. Ramsey. On a problem in formal logic. Proc. London Math. Soc., 1930.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.