Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Noise suppression using symmetric exchange gates in spin qubits

Published 23 Nov 2015 in cond-mat.mes-hall | (1511.07336v2)

Abstract: We demonstrate a substantial improvement in the spin-exchange gate using symmetric control instead of conventional detuning in GaAs spin qubits, up to a factor-of-six increase in the quality factor of the gate. For symmetric operation, nanosecond voltage pulses are applied to the barrier that controls the interdot potential between quantum dots, modulating the exchange interaction while maintaining symmetry between the dots. Excellent agreement is found with a model that separately includes electrical and nuclear noise sources for both detuning and symmetric gating schemes. Unlike exchange control via detuning, the decoherence of symmetric exchange rotations is dominated by rotation-axis fluctuations due to nuclear field noise rather than direct exchange noise.

Citations (192)

Summary

Analysis of Noise Suppression Using Symmetric Exchange Gates in Spin Qubits

The paper "Noise suppression using symmetric exchange gates in spin qubits" by Martins et al. explores an innovative approach to enhance the performance of GaAs spin qubits. The authors concentrate on the utilization of symmetric control over conventional detuning to improve the quality factor of exchange gates by a factor of six. This advancement is achieved by applying nanosecond voltage pulses to the barrier controlling the interdot potential, thus modulating the exchange interaction while maintaining symmetry between quantum dots.

This research highlights the importance of mitigating environmental noise, a critical limitation in the coherence of spin qubits. By employing symmetric exchange gates, the authors address noise stemming from both electrical perturbations and nuclear spin interactions. In the symmetric gating scheme, the decoherence of exchange rotations is primarily influenced by fluctuations in the rotation axis due to nuclear field noise rather than direct exchange noise, which contrasts with the conventional detuning control.

The experimental setup involved a double quantum dot device with integrated charge sensing, fabricated on a GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure. This setup allowed the team to observe significant improvements in exchange oscillations. They achieved a quality factor, (Q), of approximately 35 using symmetric control, as opposed to a (Q) of about 6 with traditional tilt-induced exchange. Notably, in this symmetric configuration, (Q) scales with the exchange interaction, (J), over the measured range of 40 MHz to 700 MHz. This scaling contrasts with the tilt-induced method, where the quality factor remains static across the same range due to dominating electrical noise above 0.2 GHz.

The model developed includes noise sources from both nuclear and electrical origins, offering insights into the decoherence dynamics of qubit operations. This model successfully aligns with experimental observations, substantiating the claim that symmetric exchange is more resilient to electrical noise because the symmetry reduces the sensitivity to detuning gate voltage fluctuations.

From a practical standpoint, this research suggests that symmetric exchange operations could be extended to various qubit implementations reliant on exchange interactions. Theoretical implications propose that advancements in symmetric control could feasibly increase the quality factor beyond 50 through further increases in (J).

This study not only reinforces the strategic advantage of symmetric exchange in preserving coherence but also lays the groundwork for future qubit technologies where high-fidelity operations are paramount. The findings could stimulate further research into minimizing intrinsic and extrinsic noise sources, potentially elevating symmetric exchange gates as a standard in quantum computing architectures.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.