Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Insight into $f_0(980)$ through the $B_{(s)}$ charmed decays

Published 16 Jan 2016 in hep-ph | (1601.04137v1)

Abstract: Through analyzing the $B_{(s)}$ charmed decays $B{0}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(980)$ and $B_{s}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(980)$ within the framework of the PQCD factorization approach and comparing with the current data, we find that there are two possible regions for the $f_0(980)-f_0(500)$ mixing angle $\theta$: one is centered at $34\circ\sim38\circ$ and the other is falls into $142\circ\sim154\circ$. The former can overlap mostly with one of allowed angle regions extracted from the decay $B{0}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(500)$. The branching fractions of $B_s$ decay modes are less sensitive to the mixing angle compared with those of B decay modes. Especially, for the decay $B_{s}\to D0 f_0(980)$, its branching fraction changes only slightly between $(1.2\sim1.8)\times10{-7}$ when the mixing angle $\theta$ runs from $0\circ$ to $180\circ$. All of our results support the picture that the $f_0(980)$ is dominated by two quark component in the B decay dynamic mechanism. Furthermore, the $s\bar s$ component is more important than the $q\bar q=(u\bar u+d\bar d)/\sqrt{2}$ component. This point is different from $f_0(500)/\sigma$. Last but not least, our picture is not in conflict with the popular four-quark explanation.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.