Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Faster Projection-free Convex Optimization over the Spectrahedron

Published 20 May 2016 in math.OC and cs.LG | (1605.06203v1)

Abstract: Minimizing a convex function over the spectrahedron, i.e., the set of all positive semidefinite matrices with unit trace, is an important optimization task with many applications in optimization, machine learning, and signal processing. It is also notoriously difficult to solve in large-scale since standard techniques require expensive matrix decompositions. An alternative, is the conditional gradient method (aka Frank-Wolfe algorithm) that regained much interest in recent years, mostly due to its application to this specific setting. The key benefit of the CG method is that it avoids expensive matrix decompositions all together, and simply requires a single eigenvector computation per iteration, which is much more efficient. On the downside, the CG method, in general, converges with an inferior rate. The error for minimizing a $\beta$-smooth function after $t$ iterations scales like $\beta/t$. This convergence rate does not improve even if the function is also strongly convex. In this work we present a modification of the CG method tailored for convex optimization over the spectrahedron. The per-iteration complexity of the method is essentially identical to that of the standard CG method: only a single eigenvecor computation is required. For minimizing an $\alpha$-strongly convex and $\beta$-smooth function, the expected approximation error of the method after $t$ iterations is: $$O\left({\min{\frac{\beta{}}{t} ,\left({\frac{\beta\sqrt{\textrm{rank}(\textbf{X}*)}}{\alpha{1/4}t}}\right){4/3}, \left({\frac{\beta}{\sqrt{\alpha}\lambda_{\min}(\textbf{X}*)t}}\right){2}}}\right) ,$$ where $\textbf{X}*$ is the optimal solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result that attains provably faster convergence rates for a CG variant for optimization over the spectrahedron. We also present encouraging preliminary empirical results.

Citations (30)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.