Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Impact of General Channel Aging Conditions on the Downlink Performance of Massive MIMO

Published 24 May 2016 in cs.IT | (1605.07661v1)

Abstract: Recent works have identified massive multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) as a key technology for achieving substantial gains in spectral and energy efficiency. Additionally, the turn to low-cost transceivers, being prone to hardware impairments is the most effective and attractive way for cost-efficient applications concerning massive MIMO systems. In this context, the impact of channel aging, which severely affects the performance, is investigated herein by considering a generalized model. Specifically, we show that both Doppler shift because of the users' relative movement as well as phase noise due to noisy local oscillators (LOs) contribute to channel aging. To this end, we first propose a joint model, encompassing both effects, in order to investigate the performance of a massive MIMO system based on the inevitable time-varying nature of realistic mobile communications. Then, we derive the deterministic equivalents (DEs) for the signal-to-noise-and-interference ratios (SINRs) with maximum ratio transmission (MRT) and regularized zero-forcing precoding (RZF). Our analysis not only demonstrates a performance comparison between MRT and RZF under these conditions, but most importantly, it reveals interesting properties regarding the effects of user mobility and phase noise. In particular, the large antenna limit behavior depends profoundly on both effects, but the burden due to user mobility is much more detrimental than phase noise even for moderate user velocities ($\approx30$ km/h), while the negative impact of phase noise is noteworthy at lower mobility conditions.

Citations (129)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that user mobility has a more significant detrimental effect on channel aging than phase noise in massive MIMO systems.
  • The authors employ an autoregressive LMMSE channel estimation model to evaluate SINR performance with MRT and RZF precoders in both single-cell and multi-cell setups.
  • The study highlights that mitigating phase noise is crucial in low-mobility scenarios to enhance downlink rates and achieve power efficiency.

Introduction

The paper examines the impact of channel aging on the performance of massive MIMO systems, focusing on the degradation caused by user mobility and phase noise. It introduces a joint model that incorporates these phenomena to evaluate performance using MRT and RZF precoders. The study reveals how user movement and phase noise jointly influence channel aging, emphasizing that user mobility has a more significant detrimental effect on system performance compared to phase noise.

System Model

The model considers a single-cell setup where a base station (BS) equipped with MM antennas communicates with KK single-antenna users. The work extends the basic channel model by incorporating phase noise into the channel vector as a multiplicative factor. The phase noise, modeled by a Wiener process, affects both the transmitter and receiver, leading to a time-varying channel affected by mobility (Doppler shift) and hardware imperfections (phase noise).

Channel Estimation and Aging

The channel estimation uses an LMMSE approach, which assumes constant channel and phase noise during training. The paper presents an autoregressive model of channel aging, where the channel at time nn is a combination of the initial channel and a noise term accounting for the channel's evolution. This approach highlights that phase noise accumulates over time and contributes to channel aging similarly to Doppler effects.

The performance evaluation focuses on the deterministic equivalents (DEs) of the SINRs for MRT and RZF precoding under the influence of both user mobility and phase noise. The analysis explores the asymptotic behavior as M,K→∞M, K \to \infty with a fixed ratio K/M=βK/M = \beta, demonstrating that these approximations match well with simulation results even for moderate system sizes. Figure 1

Figure 1: Simulated and DE downlink sum-rates with MRT and RZF precoders in a static environment versus the number of BS antennas for various values of phase noise. Red and black lines correspond to the theoretical sum-rates with RZF and MRT precoding, respectively, while the black bullets refer to the simulation results.

Numerical Results

The numerical results show that RZF generally outperforms MRT in terms of achievable rates and required transmit power. The detrimental impact of phase noise becomes negligible at higher Doppler shifts, emphasizing that Doppler-induced channel variation is the dominant factor in channel aging. This conclusion suggests that efforts to mitigate the phase noise are more critical in static or low-mobility environments. Figure 2

Figure 2: Required transmit power to achieve 1 bit/s/Hz per user with MRT and RZF precoders in a static environment versus the number of BS antennas and various values of phase noise. Red and black lines correspond to the theoretical sum-rates with RZF and MRT precoding, respectively, while the black bullets refer to the simulation results.

Multi-Cell Extension

The study extends to a multi-cell scenario, illustrating that channel aging impacts both intra- and inter-cell interference. The performance degradation due to channel aging in a cellular layout behaves similarly to that in a single-cell environment, with inter-cell interference further degrading performance due to pilot contamination. Figure 3

Figure 3: Simulated downlink sum-rates with MRT and RZF precoders in a cellular setting with L=7 when M=60 as a function of the normalized Doppler shift for various values of phase noise. Red and black lines correspond to the simulated sum-rates with RZF and MRT precoding, respectively. The green "solid" and "dot" lines mirror a scenario with channel aging but not phase noise in the cases of MRT and RZF, respectively. Lines parallel to the x-axis represent scenarios with no channel aging.

Conclusion

The study underscores the significance of considering both phase noise and Doppler effects in evaluating the performance of massive MIMO systems. It highlights the need for phase noise mitigation in low-mobility scenarios and suggests the potential for significant power savings by exploiting the scaling behavior of massive MIMO. The insights provided can guide the design and optimization of real-world systems, ensuring robust performance despite channel aging effects.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.