Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Discretized Approaches to Schematization

Published 21 Jun 2016 in cs.CG | (1606.06488v1)

Abstract: To produce cartographic maps, simplification is typically used to reduce complexity of the map to a legible level. With schematic maps, however, this simplification is pushed far beyond the legibility threshold and is instead constrained by functional need and resemblance. Moreover, stylistic geometry is often used to convey the schematic nature of the map. In this paper we explore discretized approaches to computing a schematic shape $S$ for a simple polygon $P$. We do so by overlaying a plane graph $G$ on $P$ as the solution space for the schematic shape. Topological constraints imply that $S$ should describe a simple polygon. We investigate two approaches, simple map matching and connected face selection, based on commonly used similarity metrics. With the former, $S$ is a simple cycle $C$ in $G$ and we quantify resemblance via the Fr\'echet distance. We prove that it is NP-hard to compute a cycle that approximates the minimal Fr\'echet distance over all simple cycles in a plane graph $G$. This result holds even if $G$ is a partial grid graph, if area preservation is required and if we assume a given sequence of turns is specified. With the latter, $S$ is a connected face set in $G$, quantifying resemblance via the symmetric difference. Though the symmetric difference seems a less strict measure, we prove that it is NP-hard to compute the optimal face set. This result holds even if $G$ is full grid graph or a triangular or hexagonal tiling, and if area preservation is required. Moreover, it is independent of whether we allow the set of faces to have holes or not.

Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.