Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Precision matrix expansion - efficient use of numerical simulations in estimating errors on cosmological parameters

Published 22 Mar 2017 in astro-ph.IM | (1703.07786v1)

Abstract: Computing the inverse covariance matrix (or precision matrix) of large data vectors is crucial in weak lensing (and multi-probe) analyses of the large scale structure of the universe. Analytically computed covariances are noise-free and hence straightforward to invert, however the model approximations might be insufficient for the statistical precision of future cosmological data. Estimating covariances from numerical simulations improves on these approximations, but the sample covariance estimator is inherently noisy, which introduces uncertainties in the error bars on cosmological parameters and also additional scatter in their best fit values. For future surveys, reducing both effects to an acceptable level requires an unfeasibly large number of simulations. In this paper we describe a way to expand the true precision matrix around a covariance model and show how to estimate the leading order terms of this expansion from simulations. This is especially powerful if the covariance matrix is the sum of two contributions, $\smash{\mathbf{C} = \mathbf{A}+\mathbf{B}}$, where $\smash{\mathbf{A}}$ is well understood analytically and can be turned off in simulations (e.g. shape-noise for cosmic shear) to yield a direct estimate of $\smash{\mathbf{B}}$. We test our method in mock experiments resembling tomographic weak lensing data vectors from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Large Synoptic Survey Telecope (LSST). For DES we find that $400$ N-body simulations are sufficient to achive negligible statistical uncertainties on parameter constraints. For LSST this is achieved with $2400$ simulations. The standard covariance estimator would require >$105$ simulations to reach a similar precision. We extend our analysis to a DES multi-probe case finding a similar performance.

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.