Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Plug-and-Play Unplugged: Optimization Free Reconstruction using Consensus Equilibrium

Published 24 May 2017 in cs.CV and math.OC | (1705.08983v3)

Abstract: Regularized inversion methods for image reconstruction are used widely due to their tractability and ability to combine complex physical sensor models with useful regularity criteria. Such methods motivated the recently developed Plug-and-Play prior method, which provides a framework to use advanced denoising algorithms as regularizers in inversion. However, the need to formulate regularized inversion as the solution to an optimization problem limits the possible regularity conditions and physical sensor models. In this paper, we introduce Consensus Equilibrium (CE), which generalizes regularized inversion to include a much wider variety of both forward components and prior components without the need for either to be expressed with a cost function. CE is based on the solution of a set of equilibrium equations that balance data fit and regularity. In this framework, the problem of MAP estimation in regularized inversion is replaced by the problem of solving these equilibrium equations, which can be approached in multiple ways. The key contribution of CE is to provide a novel framework for fusing multiple heterogeneous models of physical sensors or models learned from data. We describe the derivation of the CE equations and prove that the solution of the CE equations generalizes the standard MAP estimate under appropriate circumstances. We also discuss algorithms for solving the CE equations, including ADMM with a novel form of preconditioning and Newton's method. We give examples to illustrate consensus equilibrium and the convergence properties of these algorithms and demonstrate this method on some toy problems and on a denoising example in which we use an array of convolutional neural network denoisers, none of which is tuned to match the noise level in a noisy image but which in consensus can achieve a better result than any of them individually.

Citations (175)

Summary

Consensus Equilibrium: A Framework for Image Reconstruction Beyond Optimization

Introduction and Motivation

The paper "Consensus Equilibrium" authored by Gregery T. Buzzard et al. introduces an innovative framework aimed at generalizing regularized inversion methods for image reconstruction, extending beyond traditional optimization paradigms. The need for this arises from current limitations inherent in formulating regularized inversion solely as optimization problems, which constrains their expressive capacity regarding regularity conditions and physical sensor models.

By introducing Consensus Equilibrium (CE), the paper seeks to provide a more robust framework able to incorporate a greater diversity of forward components such as data fidelity elements, alongside prior regularity components without necessitating their expression through a cost function framework. This approach pivots on equilibrium equations that balance data fitting with regularity, replacing the conventional maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation with the task of resolving these equilibrium equations.

Core Contributions and Results

The primary contribution of the paper is the establishment of Consensus Equilibrium as a comprehensive framework for integrating multiple heterogeneous models of physical sensors. This is achieved by formulating a set of equilibrium equations that balance data fit and regularity, thus generalizing the MAP estimate under specific conditions.

The paper presents several algorithmic approaches for solving the equilibrium equations, notably including a version of the Douglas-Rachford (DR)/ADMM algorithm supplemented with a novel preconditioning technique, as well as variations of Newton's method—both standard and a Jacobian-free form employing Krylov subspaces.

Among the numerical results showcased are several examples that illustrate the convergence properties of these algorithms. One particularly notable example involves denoising using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), where the networks are not tuned specifically to match the noise levels of the input images. Despite this, achieving consensus among them produces superior results compared to any singularly applied CNN denoiser.

Implications and Future Directions

Practical Implications: The Consensus Equilibrium framework opens opportunities for more versatile image reconstruction strategies. It allows practitioners to employ advanced denoising algorithms and integrate models learned from data more effectively without being bound to optimization constraints. This could be particularly impactful in fields such as medical imaging and remote sensing, where heterogeneous data integration is essential.

Theoretical Implications: The CE framework broadens the theoretical landscape of regularized inversion methods. By detaching the inversion process from traditional optimization, it invites new approaches that could leverage advancements in machine learning and data-driven modeling, potentially transforming inverse problem solving methodologies.

Speculations on Future AI Developments: As AI progresses, the CE framework could benefit from deeper integration of highly adaptive neural networks and enhanced algorithmic preconditioning strategies. Future developments might see the CE framework being augmented with more sophisticated deep learning architectures capable of better handling non-linear regularity conditions without linear approximations, thus further enhancing model expressiveness.

In conclusion, the Consensus Equilibrium framework represents a significant step forward in enhancing the versatility and effectiveness of image reconstruction processes beyond the limitations of optimization-centric approaches. This foundational flexibility not only empowers immediate applications but also paves the way for future innovations in how data reconciliation across distinct modalities and conditions could be accomplished.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.