Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Supervised Neural Networks for Helioseismic Ring-Diagram Inversions

Published 6 Jan 2019 in astro-ph.SR and cs.LG | (1901.01505v1)

Abstract: The inversion of ring fit parameters to obtain subsurface flow maps in ring-diagram analysis for 8 years of SDO observations is computationally expensive, requiring ~3200 CPU hours. In this paper we apply machine learning techniques to the inversion in order to speed up calculations. Specifically, we train a predictor for subsurface flows using the mode fit parameters and the previous inversion results, to replace future inversion requirements. We utilize Artificial Neural Networks as a supervised learning method for predicting the flows in 15 degree ring tiles. To demonstrate that the machine learning results still contain the subtle signatures key to local helioseismic studies, we use the machine learning results to study the recently discovered solar equatorial Rossby waves. The Artificial Neural Network is computationally efficient, able to make future flow predictions of an entire Carrington rotation in a matter of seconds, which is much faster than the current ~31 CPU hours. Initial training of the networks requires ~3 CPU hours. The trained Artificial Neural Network can achieve a root mean-square error equal to approximately half that reported for the velocity inversions, demonstrating the accuracy of the machine learning (and perhaps the overestimation of the original errors from the ring-diagram pipeline). We find the signature of equatorial Rossby waves in the machine learning flows covering six years of data, demonstrating that small-amplitude signals are maintained. The recovery of Rossby waves in the machine learning flow maps can be achieved with only one Carrington rotation (27.275 days) of training data. We have shown that machine learning can be applied to, and perform more efficiently than the current ring-diagram inversion. The computation burden of the machine learning includes 3 CPU hours for initial training, then around 0.0001 CPU hours for future predictions.

Citations (9)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.