Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Signatures of Anelastic Domain Relaxation in Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_{x}$)$_{2}$As$_{2}$ Investigated by Mechanical Modulation of Resistivity

Published 12 Mar 2019 in cond-mat.str-el and cond-mat.mtrl-sci | (1903.04732v1)

Abstract: The resistive response of Ba(Fe${1-x}$Co${x}$)${2}$As${2}$ to AC mechanical deformation is considered in the multi-domain state. This resistance change depends both upon the anelastic relaxation of domain walls and upon the relation between resistance and the domain wall configuration. Samples are adhered to the surface of a piezoelectric stack, which is driven by an AC voltage while the AC modulation of the sample resistance is measured. As the response time of electrons is faster than that of the lattice, the phase difference $\phi$ between the AC resistance modulation and the AC deformation of the piezoelectric is entirely due to anelastic relaxation effects in the sample. An expression is derived for relating $\phi$ to a sample's complex compliance, $J(\omega)$, in this experimental configuration. Measurements of Ba(Fe${1-x}$Co${x}$)${2}$As${2}$ for x= (0.025, 0.052) reveal a peak in the out-of-phase resistivity modulation in the orthorhombic antiferromagnetic state well below the Ne\'el temperature $T_N$ and structural transition $T_S$. Meanwhile, for a composition that is tetragonal at all temperatures, x=0.07, the resistance modulation remains entirely in phase over the same temperatures, establishing domain motion as a probable cause of the observed effects in the samples that do undergo the tetragonal-to-orthorhombic transition. Fits are provided of $\tan\phi$ for a sample with x=0.025 for various amplitude excitations on the piezoelectric stack, from which the apparent activation energy $E_a$ for domain wall motion is found to decreases with increasing amplitude of the deformation along the $[110]T$ axis. We find $\frac{dE_a}{d\varepsilon0{[110,110]_T}} = -1115\pm 196$ eV with $E_a = 9.09 \pm 0.74 \times 10{-3}$ eV in the zero strain limit if we assume linearity over the entire range of strain amplitudes.

Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.