Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registration

Published 8 May 2019 in cs.CV | (1905.03304v1)

Abstract: Point cloud registration is a key problem for computer vision applied to robotics, medical imaging, and other applications. This problem involves finding a rigid transformation from one point cloud into another so that they align. Iterative Closest Point (ICP) and its variants provide simple and easily-implemented iterative methods for this task, but these algorithms can converge to spurious local optima. To address local optima and other difficulties in the ICP pipeline, we propose a learning-based method, titled Deep Closest Point (DCP), inspired by recent techniques in computer vision and natural language processing. Our model consists of three parts: a point cloud embedding network, an attention-based module combined with a pointer generation layer, to approximate combinatorial matching, and a differentiable singular value decomposition (SVD) layer to extract the final rigid transformation. We train our model end-to-end on the ModelNet40 dataset and show in several settings that it performs better than ICP, its variants (e.g., Go-ICP, FGR), and the recently-proposed learning-based method PointNetLK. Beyond providing a state-of-the-art registration technique, we evaluate the suitability of our learned features transferred to unseen objects. We also provide preliminary analysis of our learned model to help understand whether domain-specific and/or global features facilitate rigid registration.

Citations (781)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a learning-based framework for predicting optimal rigid transformations that align point clouds, significantly improving upon ICP.
  • It utilizes a feature embedding network with an attention-based module and a differentiable SVD layer to compute registrations with lower error rates.
  • Experimental results on ModelNet40 demonstrate DCP's robustness to noise and its ability to generalize to unseen data.

Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registration

The paper "Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registration" (1905.03304) presents a novel approach to the problem of point cloud registration. The proposed method, Deep Closest Point (DCP), leverages advancements in deep learning to effectively align point clouds by predicting a rigid transformation. DCP aims to overcome the limitations of traditional methods like Iterative Closest Point (ICP), which often suffer from convergence to local optima.

Motivation and Background

Point cloud registration is a fundamental task in computer vision applications like robotics and medical imaging. The task involves finding the rigid transformation that best aligns one point cloud with another. Traditional methods such as ICP rely on iterative optimization, which is prone to local optima due to the non-convex nature of the problem. To address these issues, the authors introduce a learning-based framework that integrates insights from recent developments in computer vision and natural language processing.

Methodology

Architecture Overview

The DCP model consists of three main components:

  1. Feature Embedding Network: The input point clouds are embedded into a high-dimensional space using networks like PointNet or DGCNN, which generate permutation-invariant and rigid-invariant representations.
  2. Attention-Based Module with Pointer Generation: An attention mechanism, inspired by Transformers, facilitates the matching between points of the two clouds. This module outputs a soft matching between points, approximating a combinatorial matching.
  3. Differentiable SVD Layer: The final rigid transformation is computed using a differentiable singular value decomposition (SVD) layer, which extracts the optimal transformation aligning the two point clouds. Figure 1

    Figure 1: Left: a moved guitar. Right: rotated human. All methods work well with small transformation. However, only our method achieve satisfying alignment for objects with sharp features and large transformation.

Training and Loss Function

The model is trained end-to-end on the ModelNet40 dataset, optimizing a loss function that measures the deviation of predicted transformations from ground truth. The loss function includes terms for both rotation and translation errors, along with a regularization term to prevent overfitting.

Experimental Results

Performance Comparison

The experiments demonstrate that DCP outperforms traditional ICP and its variants, as well as recent learning-based methods like PointNetLK. DCP achieves lower mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) in both rotation and translation across various datasets, highlighting its robustness and efficiency. Figure 2

Figure 2: Results of DCP-v2. Top: inputs. Bottom: outputs of DCP-v2.

Generalization and Robustness

DCP's learned features generalize well to unseen data, suggesting that the model captures salient geometric features crucial for registration. Moreover, DCP exhibits resilience to Gaussian noise, preserving alignment accuracy even with perturbed input data.

Implementation Considerations

When implementing DCP, computational efficiency is a critical consideration. The model benefits from deep learning frameworks like PyTorch or TensorFlow, which support automatic differentiation required by the SVD layer. Additionally, the model's ability to provide a good initial guess for ICP means it can also be utilized to improve traditional ICP outcomes by serving as a robust initializer.

Conclusion

The Deep Closest Point method presents a significant advancement in point cloud registration by integrating deep learning techniques with classical geometric principles. Its performance in terms of accuracy and robustness makes it a compelling alternative to traditional methods. Future research could explore the adaptation of DCP for related tasks, such as 3D object detection and pose estimation, potentially broadening its applications in real-world systems.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 55 likes about this paper.