Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Towards a precision calculation of the effective number of neutrinos $N_{\rm eff}$ in the Standard Model I: The QED equation of state

Published 11 Nov 2019 in hep-ph and astro-ph.CO | (1911.04504v3)

Abstract: We revisit several aspects of Standard Model physics at finite temperature that drive the theoretical value of the cosmological parameter $N_{\rm eff}$, the effective number of neutrinos in the early universe, away from 3. Our chief focus is finite-temperature corrections to the equation of state of the QED plasma in the vicinity of neutrino decoupling at $T \sim 1$ MeV, where $T$ is the photon temperature. Working in the instantaneous decoupling approximation, we recover at ${\cal O}(e2)$, where $e$ is the elementary electric charge, the well-established correction of $\delta N_{\rm eff}{(2)} \simeq 0.010$ across a range of plausible neutrino decoupling temperatures, in contrast to an erroneous claim in the recent literature which found twice as large an effect. At ${\cal O}(e3)$ we find a new and significant correction of $\delta N_{\rm eff}{(3)} \simeq -0.001$ that has so far not been accounted for in any precision calculation of $N_{\rm eff}$, significant because this correction is potentially larger than the change in $N_{\rm eff}$ induced between including and excluding neutrino oscillations in the transport modelling. In addition to the QED equation of state, we make a first pass at quantifying finite-temperature QED corrections to the weak interaction rates that directly affect the neutrino decoupling process, and find that the ${\cal O}(e2)$ thermal electron mass correction induces a change of $\delta N_{\rm eff}{m_{\rm th}} \lesssim 10{-4}$. A complete assessment of the various effects considered in this work on the final value of $N_{\rm eff}$ will necessitate an account of neutrino energy transport beyond the instantaneous decoupling approximation. However, relative to $N_{\rm eff} = 3.044$ obtained in the most recent such calculation, we expect the new effects found in this work to lower the number to $N_{\rm eff} = 3.043$.

Citations (74)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.