Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Analysis of the Frank-Wolfe Method for Convex Composite Optimization involving a Logarithmically-Homogeneous Barrier

Published 18 Oct 2020 in math.OC | (2010.08999v4)

Abstract: We present and analyze a new generalized Frank-Wolfe method for the composite optimization problem $(P):{\min}_{x\in\mathbb{R}n}\; f(\mathsf{A} x) + h(x)$, where $f$ is a $\theta$-logarithmically-homogeneous self-concordant barrier, $\mathsf{A}$ is a linear operator and the function $h$ has bounded domain but is possibly non-smooth. We show that our generalized Frank-Wolfe method requires $O((\delta_0 + \theta + R_h)\ln(\delta_0) + (\theta + R_h)2/\varepsilon)$ iterations to produce an $\varepsilon$-approximate solution, where $\delta_0$ denotes the initial optimality gap and $R_h$ is the variation of $h$ on its domain. This result establishes certain intrinsic connections between $\theta$-logarithmically homogeneous barriers and the Frank-Wolfe method. When specialized to the $D$-optimal design problem, we essentially recover the complexity obtained by Khachiyan using the Frank-Wolfe method with exact line-search. We also study the (Fenchel) dual problem of $(P)$, and we show that our new method is equivalent to an adaptive-step-size mirror descent method applied to the dual problem. This enables us to provide iteration complexity bounds for the mirror descent method despite even though the dual objective function is non-Lipschitz and has unbounded domain. In addition, we present computational experiments that point to the potential usefulness of our generalized Frank-Wolfe method on Poisson image de-blurring problems with TV regularization, and on simulated PET problem instances.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.