Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

AI Driven Knowledge Extraction from Clinical Practice Guidelines: Turning Research into Practice

Published 10 Dec 2020 in cs.AI and cs.CL | (2012.05489v1)

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) represent the foremost methodology for sharing state-of-the-art research findings in the healthcare domain with medical practitioners to limit practice variations, reduce clinical cost, improve the quality of care, and provide evidence based treatment. However, extracting relevant knowledge from the plethora of CPGs is not feasible for already burdened healthcare professionals, leading to large gaps between clinical findings and real practices. It is therefore imperative that state-of-the-art Computing research, especially machine learning is used to provide artificial intelligence based solution for extracting the knowledge from CPGs and reducing the gap between healthcare research/guidelines and practice. Methods: This research presents a novel methodology for knowledge extraction from CPGs to reduce the gap and turn the latest research findings into clinical practice. First, our system classifies the CPG sentences into four classes such as condition-action, condition-consequences, action, and not-applicable based on the information presented in a sentence. We use deep learning with state-of-the-art word embedding, improved word vectors technique in classification process. Second, it identifies qualifier terms in the classified sentences, which assist in recognizing the condition and action phrases in a sentence. Finally, the condition and action phrase are processed and transformed into plain rule If Condition(s) Then Action format. Results: We evaluate the methodology on three different domains guidelines including Hypertension, Rhinosinusitis, and Asthma. The deep learning model classifies the CPG sentences with an accuracy of 95%. While rule extraction was validated by user-centric approach, which achieved a Jaccard coefficient of 0.6, 0.7, and 0.4 with three human experts extracted rules, respectively.

Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.