Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Anomaly indicators and bulk-boundary correspondences for 3D interacting topological crystalline phases with mirror and continuous symmetries

Published 6 May 2021 in cond-mat.str-el, hep-th, math-ph, and math.MP | (2105.02682v1)

Abstract: We derive a series of quantitative bulk-boundary correspondences for 3D bosonic and fermionic symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases under the assumption that the surface is gapped, symmetric and topologically ordered, i.e., a symmetry-enriched topological (SET) state. We consider those SPT phases that are protected by the mirror symmetry and continuous symmetries that form a group of $U(1)$, $SU(2)$ or $SO(3)$. In particular, the fermionic cases correspond to a crystalline version of 3D topological insulators and topological superconductors in the famous ten-fold-way classification, with the time-reversal symmetry replaced by the mirror symmetry and with strong interaction taken into account. For surface SETs, the most general interplay between symmetries and anyon excitations is considered. Based on the previously proposed dimension reduction and folding approaches, we re-derive the classification of bulk SPT phases and define a \emph{complete} set of bulk topological invariants for every symmetry group under consideration, and then derive explicit expressions of the bulk invariants in terms of surface topological properties (such as topological spin, quantum dimension) and symmetry properties (such as mirror fractionalization, fractional charge or spin). These expressions are our quantitative bulk-boundary correspondences. Meanwhile, the bulk topological invariants can be interpreted as \emph{anomaly indicators} for the surface SETs which carry 't Hooft anomalies of the associated symmetries whenever the bulk is topologically non-trivial. Hence, the quantitative bulk-boundary correspondences provide an easy way to compute the 't Hooft anomalies of the surface SETs. Moreover, our anomaly indicators are complete. Our derivations of the bulk-boundary correspondences and anomaly indicators are explicit and physically transparent.

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.