Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On Possibilities of High Precision Fundamental Physics Experiments in Spin-Transparent Storage Rings of Low Energy Polarized Electron Beams

Published 24 May 2021 in physics.acc-ph and hep-ex | (2105.11575v3)

Abstract: We present a new design of highly specialized small storage rings for low energy polarized electron beams. The new design is based on the transparent spin methodology that cancels the spin precession due to the magnetic dipole moment at any energy while allowing for spin precession induced by the fundamental physics of interest to accumulate. The buildup of the vertical component of beam polarization can be measured using standard Mott Polarimetry that is optimal at low electron energy. Systematic uncertainties are suppressed using counter-rotating bunched beams with various polarization orientations. These rings can be used to directly measure the permanent electric dipole moment of the electron, relevant to CP violation and matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe, and to search for dark energy and ultra-light dark matter.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. N. Fortson, P. Sandars, and S. Barr, Physics Today 56, 33 (2003).
  2. N. Yamanaka, International Journal of Modern Physics E 26, 1730002 (2017).
  3. T. Fukuyama and A. Silenko, International Journal of Modern Physics A 28, 1350147 (2013).
  4. V. Anastassopoulos et al. (Storage Ring EDM Collaboration), A proposal to measure the proton electric dipole moment with 10−29superscript102910^{-29}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 29 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT e⋅cm⋅𝑒cme\cdot\text{cm}italic_e ⋅ cm sensitivity (2011).
  5. S. Hacıömeroğlu and Y. K. Semertzidis, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 22, 034001 (2019).
  6. M. Conte and M. Martini, Part. Accel. 17, 1 (1985).
  7. MAD-X, Methodical Accelerator Design (2022).
  8. D. Möhl, Conf. Proc. C 831011, 97 (1983).
  9. S. Y. Lee, Accelerator Physics (Fourth Edition) (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2018) p. 248.
  10. J. B. Murphy, S. Krinsky, and R. L. Gluckstern, Part. Accel. 57, 9 (1997).
  11. R. Warnock and P. M. Morton, Part. Accel. 25, 113 (1990).
  12. Y. N. Filatov et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 778 (2020b).
  13. O. Kim and Y. K. Semertzidis, Phys. Rev. D 104, 096006 (2021).
  14. T. J. Gay and F. B. Dunning, Review of Scientific Instruments 63, 1635 (1992).
  15. V. Tioukine, K. Aulenbacher, and E. Riehn, Review of Scientific Instruments 82, 033303 (2011).
  16. X. Roca-Maza, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 120, 33002 (2017).
  17. X. Roca-Maza, private communication (2021).
  18. C. Carli and M. Haj Tahar, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 25, 064001 (2022).
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.