Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Variational learning algorithms for quantum query complexity

Published 16 May 2022 in quant-ph | (2205.07449v3)

Abstract: Quantum query complexity plays an important role in studying quantum algorithms, which captures the most known quantum algorithms, such as search and period finding. A query algorithm applies $U_tO_x\cdots U_1O_xU_0$ to some input state, where $O_x$ is the oracle dependent on some input variable $x$, and $U_i$s are unitary operations that are independent of $x$, followed by some measurements for readout. In this work, we develop variational learning algorithms to study quantum query complexity, by formulating $U_i$s as parameterized quantum circuits and introducing a loss function that is directly given by the error probability of the query algorithm. We apply our method to analyze various cases of quantum query complexity, including a new algorithm solving the Hamming modulo problem with $4$ queries for the case of $5$-bit modulo $5$, answering an open question raised in arXiv:2112.14682, and the result is further confirmed by a Semidefinite Programming (SDP) algorithm. Compared with the SDP algorithm, our method can be readily implemented on the near-term Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices and is more flexible to be adapted to other cases such as the fractional query models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. H. Buhrman and R. De Wolf, Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey, Theoretical Computer Science 288, 21 (2002).
  2. L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, in Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (1996) pp. 212–219.
  3. P. W. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM review 41, 303 (1999).
  4. D. R. Simon, On the power of quantum computation, SIAM Journal on Computing 26, 1474 (1997).
  5. D. Deutsch and R. Jozsa, Rapid solution of problems by quantum computation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 439, 553 (1992).
  6. A. Ambainis, Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 64, 750 (2002).
  7. A. Ambainis, Understanding quantum algorithms via query complexity, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians: Rio de Janeiro 2018 (World Scientific, 2018) pp. 3265–3285.
  8. A. Ambainis, J. Gruska, and S. Zheng, Exact quantum algorithms have advantage for almost all boolean functions, Quantum Information and Computation 15, 35 (2015).
  9. A. Ambainis, Superlinear advantage for exact quantum algorithms, SIAM Journal on Computing 45, 617 (2016).
  10. S. Aaronson, S. Ben-David, and R. Kothari, Separations in query complexity using cheat sheets, in Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing (2016) pp. 863–876.
  11. S. Aaronson and A. Ambainis, Forrelation: A problem that optimally separates quantum from classical computing, SIAM Journal on Computing 47, 982 (2018).
  12. A. Tal, Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (IEEE, 2020) pp. 228–239.
  13. S. Arunachalam, J. Briët, and C. Palazuelos, Quantum query algorithms are completely bounded forms, SIAM Journal on Computing 48, 903 (2019).
  14. W. Chen, Z. Ye, and L. Li, Characterization of exact one-query quantum algorithms, Physical Review A 101, 022325 (2020).
  15. Z. Ye and L. Li, Characterization of exact one-query quantum algorithms (ii): for partial functions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.11998  (2020).
  16. A. Ambainis, Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments, in Proceedings of the thirty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (2000) pp. 636–643.
  17. A. Montanaro, R. Jozsa, and G. Mitchison, On exact quantum query complexity, Algorithmica 71, 775 (2015).
  18. D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal, On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization, Mathematical programming 45, 503 (1989).
  19. https://github.com/wuzp15/VarQQA.
  20. Z. Ye, On the exact quantum query complexity of MODmnsuperscriptsubscriptMOD𝑚𝑛\text{MOD}_{m}^{n}MOD start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and EXACTk,lnsuperscriptsubscriptEXACT𝑘𝑙𝑛\text{EXACT}_{k,l}^{n}EXACT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (2023), arXiv:2303.10935 [quant-ph] .
  21. A. Cayley, Sur quelques propriétés des déterminants gauches.,  1846, 119 (1846).
  22. H. de Guise, O. Di Matteo, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Simple factorization of unitary transformations, Physical Review A 97, 022328 (2018).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 13 likes about this paper.