Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Dirac/Weyl-node-induced oscillating Casimir effect

Published 28 Jul 2022 in cond-mat.mes-hall, cond-mat.mtrl-sci, hep-lat, hep-th, and quant-ph | (2207.14078v2)

Abstract: The Casimir effect is a quantum phenomenon induced by the zero-point energy of relativistic fields confined in a finite-size system. This effect for photon fields has been studied for a long time, while the realization of counterparts for fermion fields in Dirac/Weyl semimetals is an open question. We theoretically demonstrate the typical properties of the Casimir effect for relativistic electron fields in Dirac/Weyl semimetals and show the results from an effective Hamiltonian for realistic materials such as Cd$_3$As$_2$ and Na$_3$Bi. We find an oscillation of the Casimir energy as a function of the thickness of the thin film, which stems from the existence of Dirac/Weyl nodes in momentum space. Experimentally, such an effect can be observed in thin films of semimetals, where the thickness dependence of thermodynamic quantities is affected by the Casimir energy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. H. B. G. Casimir, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. 51, 793 (1948).
  2. S. K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5 (1997), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5475 (1998)].
  3. V. M. Mostepanenko and N. N. Trunov, Sov. Phys. Usp. 31, 965 (1988).
  4. K. A. Milton, The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestations of Zero-Point Energy (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).
  5. S. Murakami, New J. Phys. 9, 356 (2007), arXiv:0710.0930 [cond-mat.mes-hall] .
  6. A. A. Burkov and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 127205 (2011), arXiv:1105.5138 [cond-mat.mes-hall] .
  7. A. G. Grushin and A. Cortijo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 020403 (2011), arXiv:1002.3481 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] .
  8. L. Chen and S. Wan, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075149 (2011), arXiv:1105.3554 [cond-mat.other] .
  9. W.-K. Tse and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 236806 (2012), arXiv:1208.3786 [cond-mat.mes-hall] .
  10. P. Rodriguez-Lopez and A. G. Grushin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 056804 (2014), arXiv:1310.2470 [cond-mat.mes-hall] .
  11. L. Chen and K. Chang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 047402 (2020).
  12. Q.-D. Jiang and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. B 99, 125403 (2019), arXiv:1805.07994 [cond-mat.mes-hall] .
  13. B.-S. Lu, Universe 7, 237 (2021), arXiv:2105.11059 [cond-mat.mes-hall] .
  14. M. Pawellek,  arXiv:1303.4708 [hep-th] .
  15. K. Nakayama and K. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022054 (2023), arXiv:2204.12032 [quant-ph] .
  16. K. Nakata and K. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 096702 (2023), arXiv:2205.13802 [quant-ph] .
  17. Y. V. Mandlecha and R. V. Gavai, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137558 (2022), arXiv:2207.00889 [hep-lat] .
  18. O. Pavlovsky and M. Ulybyshev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25, 2457 (2010a), arXiv:0911.2635 [hep-lat] .
  19. O. V. Pavlovsky and M. V. Ulybyshev, Theor. Math. Phys. 164, 1051 (2010b), [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 164, 262 (2010)].
  20. O. Pavlovsky and M. Ulybyshev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26, 2743 (2011), arXiv:1105.0544 [quant-ph] .
  21. O. Pavlovsky and M. Ulybyshev,  arXiv:0901.1960 [hep-lat] .
  22. K. Johnson, Acta Phys. Polon. B 6, 865 (1975).
  23. P. Hays, Annals Phys. 121, 32 (1979).
  24. S. G. Mamaev and N. N. Trunov, Sov. Phys. J. 23, 551 (1980).
  25. J. Ambjørn and S. Wolfram, Annals Phys. 147, 1 (1983).
  26. G. A. Steigmann and J. Goodyear, Acta Cryst. B 24, 1062 (1968).
Citations (8)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.