Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Charging the conformal window at nonzero $θ$ angle

Published 19 Aug 2022 in hep-th, hep-lat, and hep-ph | (2208.09227v2)

Abstract: We determine the impact of the $\theta$-angle and axion physics on the near conformal dynamics of the large-charge baryon sector of $SU(2)$ gauge theories with $N_f$ fermions in the fundamental representation. We employ an effective approach featuring Goldstone and dilaton degrees of freedom augmented by the topological terms in the theory. We investigate how different dilaton potentials, including the ones for which a systematic counting scheme can be established, affect the results. Via state-operator correspondence we compute the corrections to the would-be conformal dimensions of the lowest large-charge operators as a function of the $\theta$ term and dilaton potential.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (81)
  1. “Chiral estimate of the electric dipole moment of the neutron in quantum chromodynamics” In Physics Letters B 88.1-2 Elsevier, 1979, pp. 123–127
  2. Roberto D Peccei and Helen R Quinn “CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles” In Physical Review Letters 38.25 APS, 1977, pp. 1440
  3. Roberto D Peccei and Helen R Quinn “Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles” In Physical Review D 16.6 APS, 1977, pp. 1791
  4. Steven Weinberg “A New Light Boson?” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1978, pp. 223–226 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223
  5. Frank Wilczek “Problem of Strong P𝑃Pitalic_P and T𝑇Titalic_T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1978, pp. 279–282 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279
  6. Jihn E. Kim “Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1979, pp. 103 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.103
  7. Mikhail A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and Valentin I. Zakharov “Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?” In Nucl. Phys. B 166, 1980, pp. 493–506 DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(80)90209-6
  8. Michael Dine, Willy Fischler and Mark Srednicki “A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion” In Phys. Lett. B 104, 1981, pp. 199–202 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90590-6
  9. Rabindra N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic “Natural Suppression of Strong p and t Noninvariance” In Phys. Lett. B 79, 1978, pp. 283–286 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(78)90243-5
  10. “The θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ-angle and axion physics of two-color QCD at fixed baryon charge” In JHEP 11, 2022, pp. 080 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2022)080
  11. Domenico Orlando, Susanne Reffert and Francesco Sannino “Near-Conformal Dynamics at Large Charge” In Phys. Rev. D 101.6, 2020, pp. 065018 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.065018
  12. Domenico Orlando, Susanne Reffert and Francesco Sannino “Charging the Conformal Window” In Phys. Rev. D 103.10, 2021, pp. 105026 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.105026
  13. J. Schechter “Effective Lagrangian with Two Color Singlet Gluon Fields” In Phys. Rev. D 21, 1980, pp. 3393–3400 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.3393
  14. Francesco Sannino “Polyakov loops versus hadronic states” In Phys. Rev. D 66, 2002, pp. 034013 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.034013
  15. C. Rosenzweig, J. Schechter and C.G. Trahern “Is the Effective Lagrangian for QCD a Sigma Model?” In Phys. Rev. D 21, 1980, pp. 3388 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.3388
  16. Alexander A. Migdal and Mikhail A. Shifman “Dilaton Effective Lagrangian in Gluodynamics” In Phys. Lett. B 114, 1982, pp. 445–449 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90089-2
  17. “COUPLINGS OF LOW LYING GLUEBALLS TO LIGHT QUARKS, GLUONS, AND HADRONS” In Phys. Rev. D 29, 1984, pp. 1424 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.29.1424
  18. A. Salomone, J. Schechter and T. Tudron “Properties of Scalar Gluonium” In Phys. Rev. D 23, 1981, pp. 1143 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.1143
  19. John R. Ellis and Jozef Lanik “IS SCALAR GLUONIUM OBSERVABLE?” In Phys. Lett. B 150, 1985, pp. 289–294 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(85)91013-5
  20. “Scale Anomaly and the Scalars” In Phys. Rev. D 33, 1986, pp. 801 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.801
  21. “An Effective Lagrangian for the Pure N=1 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory” In Phys. Lett. B 113, 1982, pp. 231 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90828-0
  22. Stephen D.H. Hsu, Francesco Sannino and Joseph Schechter “Anomaly induced QCD potential and quark decoupling” In Phys. Lett. B 427, 1998, pp. 300–306 DOI: 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00356-6
  23. Dennis D. Dietrich, Francesco Sannino and Kimmo Tuominen “Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: Predictions for CERN LHC” In Phys. Rev. D 72, 2005, pp. 055001 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.055001
  24. Thomas Appelquist, James Ingoldby and Maurizio Piai “Dilaton EFT Framework For Lattice Data” In JHEP 07, 2017, pp. 035 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2017)035
  25. Thomas Appelquist, James Ingoldby and Maurizio Piai “Analysis of a Dilaton EFT for Lattice Data” In JHEP 03, 2018, pp. 039 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2018)039
  26. “Large-mass regime of the dilaton-pion low-energy effective theory” In Phys. Rev. D 98.5, 2018, pp. 056025 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.056025
  27. “The ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ-regime of dilaton chiral perturbation theory” In Phys. Rev. D 100.11, 2019, pp. 114515 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114515
  28. Thomas Appelquist, James Ingoldby and Maurizio Piai “Dilaton potential and lattice data” In Phys. Rev. D 101.7, 2020, pp. 075025 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075025
  29. “Chiral effective theories with a light scalar at one loop” In Nucl. Phys. B 952, 2020, pp. 114938 DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.114938
  30. Maarten Golterman, Ethan T. Neil and Yigal Shamir “Application of dilaton chiral perturbation theory to Nf=8subscript𝑁𝑓8N_{f}=8italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8, SU⁢(3)SU3{\rm SU}(3)roman_SU ( 3 ) spectral data” In Phys. Rev. D 102.3, 2020, pp. 034515 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.034515
  31. “Explorations beyond dilaton chiral perturbation theory in the eight-flavor SU(3) gauge theory” In Phys. Rev. D 102, 2020, pp. 114507 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.114507
  32. Thomas Appelquist, James Ingoldby and Maurizio Piai “Nearly Conformal Composite Higgs Model” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 126.19, 2021, pp. 191804 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.191804
  33. “Dilaton chiral perturbation theory and applications” In PoS LATTICE2021, 2022, pp. 372 DOI: 10.22323/1.396.0372
  34. Byung-Yoon Park, Mannque Rho and Vicente Vento “The Role of the Dilaton in Dense Skyrmion Matter” In Nucl. Phys. A 807, 2008, pp. 28–37 DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.03.015
  35. Thomas Appelquist, James Ingoldby and Maurizio Piai “Dilaton Effective Field Theory” In Universe 9.1, 2023, pp. 10 DOI: 10.3390/universe9010010
  36. Zackaria Chacko and Rashmish K. Mishra “Effective Theory of a Light Dilaton” In Phys. Rev. D 87.11, 2013, pp. 115006 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.115006
  37. “Dilaton Chiral Perturbation Theory: Determining the Mass and Decay Constant of the Technidilaton on the Lattice” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 113.8, 2014, pp. 082002 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.082002
  38. Yan-Ling Li, Yong-Liang Ma and Mannque Rho “Chiral-scale effective theory including a dilatonic meson” In Phys. Rev. D 95.11, 2017, pp. 114011 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.114011
  39. Aya Kasai, Ken-ichi Okumura and Hiroshi Suzuki “A dilaton-pion mass relation”, 2016 arXiv:1609.02264 [hep-lat]
  40. Martin Hansen, Kasper Langæble and Francesco Sannino “Extending Chiral Perturbation Theory with an Isosinglet Scalar” In Phys. Rev. D 95.3, 2017, pp. 036005 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.036005
  41. “Low-energy effective action for pions and a dilatonic meson” In Phys. Rev. D 94.5, 2016, pp. 054502 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.054502
  42. “Effective pion mass term and the trace anomaly” In Phys. Rev. D 95.1, 2017, pp. 016003 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.016003
  43. Dennis D. Dietrich and Francesco Sannino “Conformal window of SU(N) gauge theories with fermions in higher dimensional representations” In Phys. Rev. D 75, 2007, pp. 085018 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.085018
  44. “Orientifold theory dynamics and symmetry breaking” In Phys. Rev. D 71, 2005, pp. 051901 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.051901
  45. Francesco Sannino “Conformal Dynamics for TeV Physics and Cosmology” In Acta Phys. Polon. B 40, 2009, pp. 3533–3743 arXiv:0911.0931 [hep-ph]
  46. Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Claudio Pica and Francesco Sannino “Fundamental Composite Dynamics: A Review” In Phys. Rept. 877, 2020, pp. 1–70 DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.07.002
  47. “On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge” In JHEP 12, 2015, pp. 071 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2015)071
  48. “On the Large R𝑅Ritalic_R-charge Expansion in 𝒩=2𝒩2{\mathcal{N}}=2caligraphic_N = 2 Superconformal Field Theories” In JHEP 12, 2017, pp. 135 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2017)135
  49. Luis Alvarez-Gaume, Domenico Orlando and Susanne Reffert “Large charge at large N” In JHEP 12, 2019, pp. 142 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2019)142
  50. Domenico Orlando, Susanne Reffert and Francesco Sannino “A safe CFT at large charge” In JHEP 08, 2019, pp. 164 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2019)164
  51. “The Epsilon Expansion Meets Semiclassics” In JHEP 11, 2019, pp. 110 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2019)110
  52. “Charging the O⁢(N)𝑂𝑁O(N)italic_O ( italic_N ) model” In Phys. Rev. D 102.4, 2020, pp. 045011 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.045011
  53. Luis Álvarez Gaumé, Domenico Orlando and Susanne Reffert “Selected topics in the large quantum number expansion” In Phys. Rept. 933, 2021, pp. 1–66 DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.08.001
  54. “Spinning correlators in large-charge CFTs”, 2022 arXiv:2203.12624 [hep-th]
  55. Oleg Antipin, Jahmall Bersini and Pantelis Panopoulos “Yukawa interactions at Large Charge”, 2022 arXiv:2208.05839 [hep-th]
  56. John L. Cardy “Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling” In J. Phys. A 17, 1984, pp. L385–L387
  57. John L Cardy “Universal amplitudes in finite-size scaling: generalisation to arbitrary dimensionality” In Current Physics–Sources and Comments 2 Elsevier, 1988, pp. 370–373
  58. “Large N(c) in chiral perturbation theory” In Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 2000, pp. 623–649 DOI: 10.1007/s100520000499
  59. Sidney Coleman “Aspects of symmetry: selected Erice lectures” Cambridge University Press, 1988
  60. Chung Ngoc Leung, ST Love and William A Bardeen “Spontaneous symmetry breaking in scale invariant quantum electrodynamics” In Nuclear Physics B 273.3-4 Elsevier, 1986, pp. 649–662
  61. William A Bardeen, Chung Ngoc Leung and ST Love “Dilaton and chiral-symmetry breaking” In Physical Review Letters 56.12 APS, 1986, pp. 1230
  62. Koichi Yamawaki, Masako Bando and Ken-iti Matumoto “Scale-invariant hypercolor model and a dilaton” In Physical Review Letters 56.13 APS, 1986, pp. 1335
  63. “Chiral phase transition for SU(N) gauge theories via an effective Lagrangian approach” In Phys. Rev. D 60, 1999, pp. 056004 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.056004
  64. Deog Ki Hong, Stephen D.H. Hsu and Francesco Sannino “Composite Higgs from higher representations” In Phys. Lett. B 597, 2004, pp. 89–93 DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.07.007
  65. “A Light Dilaton in Walking Gauge Theories” In Phys. Rev. D 82, 2010, pp. 071701 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.071701
  66. Walter D. Goldberger, Benjamin Grinstein and Witold Skiba “Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 2008, pp. 111802 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.111802
  67. Andrew G. Cohen and Howard Georgi “Walking Beyond the Rainbow” In Nucl. Phys. B 314, 1989, pp. 7–24 DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(89)90109-0
  68. “Conformal phase transition in gauge theories” [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 56, 3768 (1997)] In Phys. Rev. D 55, 1997, pp. 5051–5066 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3768
  69. “Chiral phase structure of QCD with many flavors” In Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 2006, pp. 433–438 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s2006-02475-0
  70. “Conformality Lost” In Phys. Rev. D 80, 2009, pp. 125005 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.125005
  71. Hidenori S. Fukano and Francesco Sannino “Conformal Window of Gauge Theories with Four-Fermion Interactions and Ideal Walking” In Phys. Rev. D 82, 2010, pp. 035021 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.035021
  72. “Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model” In Journal of High Energy Physics 2001.04 IOP Publishing, 2001, pp. 021
  73. Zackaria Chacko and Rashmish K Mishra “Effective theory of a light dilaton” In Physical Review D 87.11 APS, 2013, pp. 115006
  74. Thomas Appelquist, James Ingoldby and Maurizio Piai “Dilaton Effective Field Theory” In Universe 9.1 Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2023, pp. 10
  75. Thomas Appelquist, James Ingoldby and Maurizio Piai “Dilaton potential and lattice data” In Physical Review D 101.7 APS, 2020, pp. 075025
  76. “Semiclassics, Goldstone Bosons and CFT data” In JHEP 06, 2017, pp. 011 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)011
  77. D.T. Son “Low-energy quantum effective action for relativistic superfluids”, 2002 arXiv:hep-ph/0204199
  78. Paolo Di Vecchia and Francesco Sannino “The Physics of the θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ-angle for Composite Extensions of the Standard Model” In Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 2014, pp. 262 DOI: 10.1140/epjp/i2014-14262-4
  79. Edward Witten “Current algebra theorems for the U (1)“Goldstone boson”” In Nuclear Physics B 156.2 Elsevier, 1979, pp. 269–283
  80. Gabriele Veneziano “U (1) without instantons” In Nuclear Physics B 159.1-2 Elsevier, 1979, pp. 213–224
  81. Gabriel Cuomo “A note on the large charge expansion in 4d CFT” In Phys. Lett. B 812, 2021, pp. 136014 DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136014
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.