Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Closed-Loop View of the Regulation of AI: Equal Impact across Repeated Interactions

Published 3 Sep 2022 in cs.AI | (2209.01410v2)

Abstract: There has been much recent interest in the regulation of AI. We argue for a view based on civil-rights legislation, built on the notions of equal treatment and equal impact. In a closed-loop view of the AI system and its users, the equal treatment concerns one pass through the loop. Equal impact, in our view, concerns the long-run average behaviour across repeated interactions. In order to establish the existence of the average and its properties, one needs to study the ergodic properties of the closed-loop and its unique stationary measure.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (59)
  1. Angeli, D. (2002). A Lyapunov approach to incremental stability properties. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(3):410–421.
  2. Machine bias. In Ethics of Data and Analytics, pages 254–264. Auerbach Publications.
  3. Beyond individual and group fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09490, abs/2008.09490.
  4. Recurrent iterated function systems. Constructive approximation, 5(1):3–31.
  5. AI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias.
  6. A history of ai and law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on ai and law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 20(3):215–319.
  7. Managing artificial intelligence. MIS quarterly, 45(3):1433–1450.
  8. Binns, R. (2020). On the apparent conflict between individual and group fairness. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 514–524.
  9. Convergence in multiagent coordination, consensus, and flocking. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 2996–3000. IEEE.
  10. Fairness in agreement with european values: An interdisciplinary perspective on ai regulation. In Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 107–118.
  11. An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. Journal of interactive marketing, 23(4):321–331.
  12. Classification with fairness constraints: A meta-algorithm with provable guarantees. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 319–328.
  13. Chae, Y. (2020). Us ai regulation guide: legislative overview and practical considerations. The Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law, 3.
  14. On the control of multi-agent systems: A survey. Foundations and Trends® in Systems and Control, 6(4):339–499.
  15. Chiappa, S. (2019). Path-specific counterfactual fairness. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pages 7801–7808.
  16. Courtland, R. (2018). The bias detectives. Nature, 558(7710):357–360.
  17. Fairness is not static: deeper understanding of long term fairness via simulation studies. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 525–534.
  18. de Laat, P. B. (2021). Companies committed to responsible ai: From principles towards implementation and regulation? Philosophy & technology, 34(4):1135–1193.
  19. Iterated random functions. SIAM Review, 41(1):45–76.
  20. Hard choices in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 300:103555.
  21. Robust counterfactual explanations for tree-based ensembles. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5742–5756. PMLR.
  22. Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference, pages 214–226.
  23. Ellul, J. (2022). Should we regulate artificial intelligence or some uses of software? Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1):1–6.
  24. Elton, J. H. (1987). An ergodic theorem for iterated maps. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 7(04):481–488.
  25. On the ergodic control of ensembles. Automatica, 108:108483.
  26. On the ergodic control of ensembles in the presence of non-linear filters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.06767.
  27. Toward fairness in ai for people with disabilities sbg@ a research roadmap. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, (125):1–1.
  28. Asymptotic coupling and a general form of harris’ theorem with applications to stochastic delay equations. Probability theory and related fields, 149(1-2):223–259.
  29. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 3315–3323.
  30. Counterfactual fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4066–4076.
  31. Model-free computation of risk contributions in credit portfolios. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 382:125351.
  32. Cooperative control of multi-agent systems: optimal and adaptive design approaches. Springer Science & Business Media.
  33. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pages 4765–4774. Curran Associates, Inc.
  34. Predictability and fairness in load aggregation and operations of virtual power plants. Automatica. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03001.
  35. McGinley, A. C. (2011). Ricci v. destefano: Diluting disparate impact and redefining disparate treatment. Nev. LJ, 12:626.
  36. Narayanan, A. (2018). Translation tutorial: 21 fairness definitions and their politics. In Proc. Conf. Fairness Accountability Transp., New York, USA, volume 1170, page 3.
  37. Distributed subgradient methods for multi-agent optimization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(1):48–61.
  38. Security and privacy for 6g: A survey on prospective technologies and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(4):2384–2428.
  39. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression. In Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press.
  40. Recruitment ai has a disability problem: anticipating and mitigating unfair automated hiring decisions.
  41. Post-processing for individual fairness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:25944–25955.
  42. Models of Law and Regulation for AI. Routledge.
  43. Regulatory capital modeling for credit risk. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 18(05):1550034.
  44. Schuett, J. (2019). Defining the scope of ai regulations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01095.
  45. Schuett, J. et al. (2019). A legal definition of ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01095.
  46. Shamma, J. (2008). Cooperative control of distributed multi-agent systems. John Wiley & Sons.
  47. Smuha, N. A. (2021a). Beyond the individual: governing AI’s societal harm Internet Policy Review, 10(3).
  48. Smuha, N. A. (2021b). From a ‘race to AI’ to a ‘race to AI regulation’: regulatory competition for artificial intelligence. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(1):57–84.
  49. When machine learning meets privacy in 6g: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(4):2694–2724.
  50. Quantum computation for pricing the collateralized debt obligations. Quantum Engineering, 3(4):e84.
  51. Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act-Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4):97–112.
  52. Counterfactual explanations for machine learning: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10596.
  53. Regulating ai in medicine in the united states and europe. Nature machine intelligence, 3(9):738–739.
  54. Robust Cooperative Control of Multi-Agent Systems: A Prediction and Observation Prospective. CRC Press.
  55. Cooperative control of multi-agent systems: Theory and applications. .
  56. Algorithms for fairness in sequential decision making. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1144–1152. PMLR.
  57. Werner, I. (2004). Ergodic theorem for contractive markov systems. Nonlinearity, 17(6):2303.
  58. Distributed cooperative control of multi-agent systems. John Wiley & Sons.
  59. Inherent tradeoffs in learning fair representations. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up