Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Semiempirical Hamiltonians learned from data can have accuracy comparable to Density Functional Theory

Published 21 Oct 2022 in physics.chem-ph | (2210.11682v2)

Abstract: Quantum chemistry provides chemists with invaluable information, but the high computational cost limits the size and type of systems that can be studied. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a means to dramatically lower cost while maintaining high accuracy. However, ML models often sacrifice interpretability by using components, such as the artificial neural networks of deep learning, that function as black boxes. These components impart the flexibility needed to learn from large volumes of data but make it difficult to gain insight into the physical or chemical basis for the predictions. Here, we demonstrate that semiempirical quantum chemical (SEQC) models can learn from large volumes of data without sacrificing interpretability. The SEQC model is that of Density Functional based Tight Binding (DFTB) with fixed atomic orbital energies and interactions that are one-dimensional functions of interatomic distance. This model is trained to ab initio data in a manner that is analogous to that used to train deep learning models. Using benchmarks that reflect the accuracy of the training data, we show that the resulting model maintains a physically reasonable functional form while achieving an accuracy, relative to coupled cluster energies with a complete basis set extrapolation (CCSD(T)*/CBS), that is comparable to that of density functional theory (DFT). This suggests that trained SEQC models can achieve low computational cost and high accuracy without sacrificing interpretability. Use of a physically-motivated model form also substantially reduces the amount of ab initio data needed to train the model compared to that required for deep learning models.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (3)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.