Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Falsification Adaptive Set in Linear Models with Instrumental Variables that Violate the Exclusion or Conditional Exogeneity Restriction

Published 9 Dec 2022 in econ.EM and stat.ME | (2212.04814v2)

Abstract: Masten and Poirier (2021) introduced the falsification adaptive set (FAS) in linear models with a single endogenous variable estimated with multiple correlated instrumental variables (IVs). The FAS reflects the model uncertainty that arises from falsification of the baseline model. We show that it applies to cases where a conditional exogeneity assumption holds and invalid instruments violate the exclusion assumption only. We propose a generalized FAS that reflects the model uncertainty when some instruments violate the exclusion assumption and/or some instruments violate the conditional exogeneity assumption. Under the assumption that invalid instruments are not themselves endogenous explanatory variables, if there is at least one relevant instrument that satisfies both the exclusion and conditional exogeneity assumptions then this generalized FAS is guaranteed to contain the parameter of interest.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. Apfel, N. and F. Windmeijer (2022): “The Falsification Adaptive Set in Linear Models with Instrumental Variables that Violate the Exogeneity or Exclusion Restriction,” arXiv 2212.04814.
  2. Duranton, G., P. M. Morrow, and M. A. Turner (2014): “Roads and Trade: Evidence from the US,” The Review of Economic Studies, 81, 681–724.
  3. Guo, Z., H. Kang, T. T. Cai, and D. S. Small (2018): “Confidence Intervals for Causal Effects with Invalid Instruments by Using Two-Stage Hard Thresholding with Voting,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 80, 793–815.
  4. Hansen, L. P. (1982): “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators,” Econometrica, 50, 1029.
  5. Heckman, J. and R. Pinto (2015): “Causal Analysis After Haavelmo,” Econometric Theory, 31, 115–151.
  6. Masten, M. A. and A. Poirier (2020): “Salvaging Falsified Instrumental Variable Models,” arXiv, 1812.11598.
  7. ——— (2021): “Salvaging Falsified Instrumental Variable Models,” Econometrica, 89, 1449–1469.
  8. Sargan, J. D. (1958): “The Estimation of Economic Relationships using Instrumental Variables,” Econometrica, 26, 393.
  9. Windmeijer, F., X. Liang, F. P. Hartwig, and J. Bowden (2021): “The Confidence Interval Method for Selecting Valid Instrumental Variables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 83, 752–776.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.