Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Strong broadband intensity noise squeezing from near-infrared to terahertz frequencies in semiconductor lasers with nonlinear dissipation

Published 14 Dec 2022 in physics.optics and quant-ph | (2212.07300v2)

Abstract: The generation and application of squeezed light have long been central goals of quantum optics, enabling sensing below the standard quantum limit, optical quantum computing platforms, and more. Intensity noise squeezing of bright (coherent) states, in contrast to squeezed vacuum, is relatively underdeveloped. Bright squeezing has been generated directly through nonlinear optical processes or ``quietly pumped'' semiconductor lasers. However, these methods suffer from weak squeezing limits, narrow operating wavelength ranges, and have not been explored at large bandwidths. Here, we show how semiconductor lasers with sharp intensity-dependent dissipation can support highly broadband intensity noise squeezing from infrared (IR) to terahertz (THz) wavelengths, the latter of which has remained unexplored in quantum noise studies. Our protocol realizes strongly ($>10$ dB) intensity noise-squeezed intracavity quantum states, which could create a new regime for cavity quantum electrodynamics experiments, as well as strong output squeezing surpassing gigahertz bandwidths. Furthermore, we show how the same systems also create self-pulsing and bistable mean field behavior, enabling control of light in both the temporal and noise domains. The existence of these multiple functionalities in both the classical and quantum mechanical domains in a single semiconductor laser platform, from IR to THz wavelengths, could enable advances in on-chip quantum optical communication, computing, and sensing across the electromagnetic spectrum.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. Quantum sensing with squeezed light. Acs Photonics, 6(6):1307–1318, 2019.
  2. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature, 606(7912):75–81, 2022.
  3. MJ Collett and CW Gardiner. Squeezing of intracavity and traveling-wave light fields produced in parametric amplification. Physical Review A, 30(3):1386, 1984.
  4. Dissipative stabilization of squeezing beyond 3 db in a microwave mode. PRX Quantum, 2(2):020323, 2021.
  5. Beating the 3 db limit for intracavity squeezing and its application to nondemolition qubit readout. Physical Review Letters, 129(12):123602, 2022.
  6. Generation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion. Physical review letters, 57(20):2520, 1986.
  7. Observation of squeezed light with 10-db quantum-noise reduction. Physical review letters, 100(3):033602, 2008.
  8. Detection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency. Physical review letters, 117(11):110801, 2016.
  9. Spectroscopy with squeezed light. Physical review letters, 68(20):3020, 1992.
  10. MJ Collett and DF Walls. Quantum limits to light amplifiers. Physical review letters, 61(21):2442, 1988.
  11. Photon number squeezed states in semiconductor lasers. Science, 255(5049):1219–1224, 1992.
  12. Bright squeezed light from a singly resonant frequency doubler. Physical review letters, 72(24):3807, 1994.
  13. Photon-number squeezed solitons from an asymmetric fiber-optic sagnac interferometer. Physical review letters, 81(12):2446, 1998.
  14. Squeezed excitation in cavity qed: Experiment and theory. Physical Review A, 58(5):4056, 1998.
  15. Single-atom cavity qed and optomicromechanics. Physical Review A, 81(2):023816, 2010.
  16. Intracavity squeezing can enhance quantum-limited optomechanical position detection through deamplification. Physical Review Letters, 115(24):243603, 2015.
  17. Intracavity-squeezed optomechanical cooling. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 13(11):1900120, 2019.
  18. Thz quantum gap: exploring potential approaches for generating and detecting non-classical states of thz light. Nanophotonics, (0), 2024.
  19. Amplitude-phase decorrelation: a method for reducing intensity noise in semiconductor lasers. IEEE journal of quantum electronics, 27(1):13–22, 1991.
  20. Room temperature generation of amplitude squeezed light from a semiconductor laser with weak optical feedback. Physical review letters, 74(17):3372, 1995.
  21. Room-temperature generation of amplitude-squeezed light from 1550-nm distributed-feedback semiconductor lasers. JOSA B, 16(3):460–464, 1999.
  22. Demonstration of a self-pulsing photonic crystal fano laser. Nature Photonics, 11(2):81–84, 2017.
  23. PD Drummond and DF Walls. Quantum theory of optical bistability. i. nonlinear polarisability model. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 13(2):725, 1980.
  24. Heterodyne pump probe measurements of nonlinear dynamics in an indium phosphide photonic crystal cavity. Applied Physics Letters, 103(18):181120, 2013.
  25. Switching characteristics of an inp photonic crystal nanocavity: Experiment and theory. Optics express, 21(25):31047–31061, 2013.
  26. Nonlinear carrier dynamics in a quantum dash optical amplifier. New Journal of Physics, 14(1):013042, 2012.
  27. Determination of bound-electronic and free-carrier nonlinearities in znse, gaas, cdte, and znte. JOSA B, 9(3):405–414, 1992.
  28. Creating large fock states and massively squeezed states in optics using systems with nonlinear bound states in the continuum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(9):e2219208120, 2023.
  29. Intense squeezed light from lasers with sharply nonlinear gain at optical frequencies. Physical Review Letters, 131(17):173801, 2023.
  30. Govind P Agrawal. Fiber-optic communication systems. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
  31. Semiconductor-laser physics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  32. Govind P Agrawal. Effect of gain and index nonlinearities on single-mode dynamics in semiconductor lasers. IEEE journal of quantum electronics, 26(11):1901–1909, 1990.
  33. Comparison of the carrier induced refractive index, gain, and linewidth enhancement factor in quantum dot and quantum well lasers. Applied physics letters, 84(7):1058–1060, 2004.
  34. Linewidth enhancement factor of terahertz quantum cascade lasers. Applied Physics Letters, 92(7), 2008.
  35. Observation of amplitude squeezing in a constant-current–driven semiconductor laser. Physical review letters, 58(10):1000, 1987.
  36. Current noise and photon noise in quantum cascade lasers. Physical Review B, 65(12):125313, 2002.
  37. Rate equation modeling of the frequency noise and the intrinsic spectral linewidth in quantum cascade lasers. Optics Express, 26(3):2325–2334, 2018.
  38. New frontiers in quantum cascade lasers and applications. IEEE Journal of selected topics in quantum electronics, 6(6):931–947, 2000.
  39. Jing Bai and DS Citrin. Intracavity nonlinearities in quantum-cascade lasers. Journal of Applied Physics, 106(3), 2009.
  40. Dual-comb spectroscopy based on quantum-cascade-laser frequency combs. Nature communications, 5(1):5192, 2014.
  41. Theory of the ultrafast nonlinear response of terahertz quantum cascade laser structures. Applied physics letters, 89(9), 2006.
  42. Dispersion compensated mid-infrared quantum cascade laser frequency comb with high power output. AIP Advances, 7(4), 2017.
  43. Self-mode-locking of quantum cascade lasers with giant ultrafast optical nonlinearities. Science, 290(5497):1739–1742, 2000.
  44. Absence of relaxation oscillation in quantum cascade lasers verified by high-frequency modulation. In Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, page CPD17. Optica Publishing Group, 2001.
  45. Photonic-crystal surface-emitting lasers: Review and introduction of modulated-photonic crystals. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 23(6):1–7, 2017.
  46. Bound states in the continuum. Nature Reviews Materials, 1(9):1–13, 2016.
  47. Distributed feedback semiconductor lasers, volume 10. IET, 1998.
  48. Kenichi Iga. Forty years of vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser: Invention and innovation. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 57(8S2):08PA01, 2018.
  49. Cavity q, mode volume, and lasing threshold in small diameter algaas microdisks with embedded quantum dots. Optics express, 14(3):1094–1105, 2006.
  50. Squeezing of intensity noise in nanolasers and nanoleds with extreme dielectric confinement. Optica, 7(11):1641–1644, 2020.
Citations (2)

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.