Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Assigning Agents to Increase Network-Based Neighborhood Diversity

Published 7 Jan 2023 in cs.DS | (2301.02876v5)

Abstract: Motivated by real-world applications such as the allocation of public housing, we examine the problem of assigning a group of agents to vertices (e.g., spatial locations) of a network so that the diversity level is maximized. Specifically, agents are of two types (characterized by features), and we measure diversity by the number of agents who have at least one neighbor of a different type. This problem is known to be NP-hard, and we focus on developing approximation algorithms with provable performance guarantees. We first present a local-improvement algorithm for general graphs that provides an approximation factor of 1/2. For the special case where the sizes of agent subgroups are similar, we present a randomized approach based on semidefinite programming that yields an approximation factor better than 1/2. Further, we show that the problem can be solved efficiently when the underlying graph is treewidth-bounded and obtain a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for the problem on planar graphs. Lastly, we conduct experiments to evaluate the per-performance of the proposed algorithms on synthetic and real-world networks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Swap stability in schelling games on graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, number 02, pages 1758–1765, (online), 2020. AAAI Press.
  2. Brenda S Baker. Approximation algorithms for np-complete problems on planar graphs. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 41(1):153–180, 1994.
  3. Emergence of scaling in random networks. science, 286(5439):509–512, 1999.
  4. Diversity constraints in public housing allocation. In 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2018), pages 973–981, Hosted by University of Liverpool Computer Science Department, 2018. IFAAMAS.
  5. Hans L Bodlaender. A partial k-arboretum of graphs with bounded treewidth. Theoretical computer science, 209(1-2):1–45, 1998.
  6. Empathy or antipathy? the impact of diversity. The American Economic Review, 96(5):1890–1905, 2006.
  7. Submodular maximization with cardinality constraints. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pages 1433–1452, Philadelphia, PA, 2014. SIAM.
  8. NYU Furman Center. How nycha preserves diversity in new york’s changing neighborhoods. https://furmancenter.org/files/NYCHA_Diversity_Brief_Final-04-30-2019.pdf, 2019.
  9. Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(1):31–38, 2014.
  10. Parliament Debates. Official report.(1989, february 16). Better racial mix in HDB housing estates, 52:650–651, 1989.
  11. On random graphs i. Publicationes Mathematicae, 6(1):290–297, 1959.
  12. For blacks in america, the gap in neighborhood poverty has declined faster than segregation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(47):13372–13377, 2016.
  13. Improved approximation algorithms for maxk-cut and max bisection. Algorithmica, 18(1):67–81, 1997.
  14. Remaking singapore’s heartland: sustaining public housing through home and neighbourhood upgrade programmes. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(3):479–490, 2018.
  15. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 42(6):1115–1145, 1995.
  16. LE Gomez and Patrick Bernet. Diversity improves performance and outcomes. Journal of the National Medical Association, 111(4):383–392, 2019.
  17. Segregation in social networks: a simple Schelling-like model. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pages 95–98, Los Alamitos, CA, 2018. IEEE.
  18. Ravit Hananel. From central to marginal: The trajectory of israel’s public-housing policy. Urban Studies, 54(11):2432–2447, 2017.
  19. Emergence of segregation in evolving social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21):8605–8610, 2011.
  20. Rachel Garshick Kleit. Neighborhood relations in suburban scattered-site and clustered public housing. Journal of Urban affairs, 23(3-4):409–430, 2001.
  21. SNAP Datasets: Stanford large network dataset collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data, June 2014.
  22. Stanley Lieberson. An asymmetrical approach to measuring residential segregation. Research Paper No. 115, 1980.
  23. Jens Ludwig et al. Long-term effects of neighborhood environments on low-income families: a summary of results from the moving to opportunity experiment. Paris, France: Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire d’évaluation des politiques publiques, 2012.
  24. Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of business ethics, 105(3):375–388, 2012.
  25. The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2):281–315, 12 1988.
  26. Probability and Computing: Randomization and Probabilistic Techniques in Algorithms and Data Analysis. Cambrige University Press, New York, NY, 2017.
  27. Barrie S. Morgan. A distance-decay based interaction index to measure residential segregation. Area, 15(3):211–217, 1983.
  28. What can be computed locally? In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 184–193, New York, NY, 1993. ACM.
  29. City of Chicago. One chicago housing strategy for a thriving city five-year housing plan, 2019.
  30. Gurobi Optimization. Reference manual. https://www.gurobi.com/documentation/9.1/refman/index.html, 2021.
  31. The impact of public housing on social networks: a natural experiment. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9):1642–1649, 2014.
  32. Graph minors. ii. algorithmic aspects of tree-width. Journal of algorithms, 7(3):309–322, 1986.
  33. Racial discrimination in housing: how landlords use algorithms and home visits to screen tenants. American Sociological Review, 86(5):787–822, 2021.
  34. Thomas C Schelling. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of mathematical sociology, 1(2):143–186, 1971.
  35. The impact of housing policies and housing markets on ethnic spatial segregation: Comparing the capital cities of four nordic welfare states. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(1):1–30, 2016.
  36. The benefits of diversity what the research tells us. About campus, 5(5):16–23, 2000.
  37. Georgios Stamoulis. Approximation algorithms for bounded color matchings via convex decompositions. In International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, pages 625–636, Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 2014. Springer.
  38. Relationship between income inequality and residential segregation of socioeconomic groups. Regional Studies, 54(4):450–461, 2020.
  39. Neil Thakral. The public-housing allocation problem. Technical report, Technical report, Harvard University, 2016.
  40. Changing occupational structures and residential segregation in new york, london and tokyo. Nature human behaviour, 4(11):1124–1134, 2020.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.