Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Probing lens-induced gravitational-wave birefringence as a test of general relativity

Published 12 Jan 2023 in gr-qc and astro-ph.CO | (2301.04826v1)

Abstract: Theories beyond general relativity (GR) modify the propagation of gravitational waves (GWs). In some, inhomogeneities (aka. gravitational lenses) allow interactions between the metric and additional fields to cause lens-induced birefringence (LIB): a different speed of the two linear GW polarisations ($+$ and $\times$). Inhomogeneities then act as non-isotropic crystals, splitting the GW signal into two components whose relative time delay depends on the theory and lens parameters. Here we study the observational prospects for GW scrambling, i.e when the time delay between both GW polarisations is smaller than the signal's duration and the waveform recorded by a detector is distorted. We analyze the latest LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA catalog, GWTC-3, and find no conclusive evidence for LIB. The highest log Bayes factor that we find in favour of LIB is $3.21$ for GW$190521$, a particularly loud but short event. However, when accounting for false alarms due to (Gaussian) noise fluctuations, this evidence is below 1-$\sigma$. The tightest constraint on the time delay is $<0.51$ ms (90% C.L.) from GW$200311_115853$. From the non-observation of GW scrambling, we constrain the optical depth for LIB, accounting for the chance of randomly distributed lenses (eg. galaxies) along the line of sight. Our LIB constraints on a (quartic) scalar-tensor Horndeski theory are more stringent than solar system tests for a wide parameter range and comparable to GW170817 in some limits. Interpreting GW190521 as an AGN binary (i.e. taking an AGN flare as a counterpart) allows even more stringent constraints. Our results demonstrate the potential and high sensitivity achievable by tests of GR, based on GW lensing.

Citations (11)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.