Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Thermodynamical properties of an ideal gas in a traversable wormhole

Published 10 Feb 2023 in gr-qc and hep-th | (2302.05492v2)

Abstract: In this work, we analyze the thermodynamic properties of non--interacting particles under influence of the gravitational field of a traversable wormhole. In particular, we investigate how the thermodynamic quantities are affected by the Ellis wormhole geometry, considering three different regions to our study: asymptotically far, close to the throat, and at the throat. The thermodynamic quantities turn out to depend strongly on parameter that controls the wormhole throat radius. By varying it, there exist an expressive modification in the thermodynamic state quantities, exhibiting both usual matter and dark energy--like behaviors. Finally, the interactions are regarded to the energy density and it seems to indicate that it "cures" the dark energy--like features.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (75)
  1. L. Flamm, Beiträge zur Einsteinschen gravitationstheorie. Hirzel, 1916.
  2. A. Einstein and N. Rosen, “The particle problem in the general theory of relativity,” Physical Review, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 73, 1935.
  3. J. A. Wheeler, “Geons,” Physical Review, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 511, 1955.
  4. H. G. Ellis, “Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 104–118, 1973.
  5. K. Bronnikov, “Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,” Acta Phys. Pol, p. B4, 1973.
  6. M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, “Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 395–412, 1988.
  7. H.-a. Shinkai and S. A. Hayward, “Fate of the first traversible wormhole: Black-hole collapse or inflationary expansion,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 4, p. 044005, 2002.
  8. J. Gonzalez, F. Guzman, and O. Sarbach, “Instability of wormholes supported by a ghost scalar field: I. linear stability analysis,” Classical and quantum gravity, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 015010, 2008.
  9. N. Tsukamoto and C. Bambi, “High energy collision of two particles in wormhole spacetimes,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 8, p. 084013, 2015.
  10. K. Bronnikov, R. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, “Instabilities of wormholes and regular black holes supported by a phantom scalar field,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 2, p. 024028, 2012.
  11. H.-a. Shinkai and T. Torii, “Wormhole dynamics,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 574, p. 012056, IOP Publishing, 2015.
  12. A. Das and S. Kar, “The ellis wormhole with ‘tachyon matter’,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 14, p. 3045, 2005.
  13. S. Sushkov, “Wormholes supported by a phantom energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 4, p. 043520, 2005.
  14. F. S. Lobo, “Phantom energy traversable wormholes,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 8, p. 084011, 2005.
  15. R. Garattini, “Casimir wormholes,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 79, no. 11, p. 951, 2019.
  16. K. Jusufi, P. Channuie, and M. Jamil, “Traversable wormholes supported by gup corrected casimir energy,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 127, 2020.
  17. M. G. Richarte and C. Simeone, “Thin-shell wormholes supported by ordinary matter in einstein-gauss-bonnet gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 8, p. 087502, 2007.
  18. J. Matulich and R. Troncoso, “Asymptotically lifshitz wormholes and black holes for lovelock gravity in vacuum,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 10, pp. 1–17, 2011.
  19. M. G. Richarte and C. Simeone, “Wormholes in einstein-born-infeld theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 10, p. 104033, 2009.
  20. L. Lessa, R. Oliveira, J. Silva, and C. Almeida, “Traversable wormhole solution with a background kalb–ramond field,” Annals of Physics, vol. 433, p. 168604, 2021.
  21. M. Nilton, J. Furtado, and G. Alencar, “Traversability of wormhole solutions in asymptotically safe gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 105, no. 8, p. 084048, 2022.
  22. M. Nilton, J. Furtado, G. Alencar, and R. Landim, “Generalized ellis–bronnikov wormholes in asymptotically safe gravity,” Annals of Physics, vol. 448, p. 169195, 2023.
  23. M. Visser, “Lorentzian wormholes. from einstein to hawking,” Woodbury, 1995.
  24. M. Bouhmadi-Lopez, F. S. Lobo, and P. Martin-Moruno, “Wormholes minimally violating the null energy condition,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2014, no. 11, p. 007, 2014.
  25. M. Cataldo, S. Del Campo, P. Minning, and P. Salgado, “Evolving lorentzian wormholes supported by phantom matter and cosmological constant,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 2, p. 024005, 2009.
  26. M. Churilova, R. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, “Arbitrarily long-lived quasinormal modes in a wormhole background,” Physics Letters B, vol. 802, p. 135207, 2020.
  27. S. Aneesh, S. Bose, and S. Kar, “Gravitational waves from quasinormal modes of a class of lorentzian wormholes,” Physical Review D, vol. 97, no. 12, p. 124004, 2018.
  28. R. Konoplya, “How to tell the shape of a wormhole by its quasinormal modes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 784, pp. 43–49, 2018.
  29. M. Churilova, R. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik, and A. Zhidenko, “Wormholes without exotic matter: quasinormal modes, echoes and shadows,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2021, no. 10, p. 010, 2021.
  30. K. A. Bronnikov, R. A. Konoplya, and T. D. Pappas, “General parametrization of wormhole spacetimes and its application to shadows and quasinormal modes,” Physical Review D, vol. 103, no. 12, p. 124062, 2021.
  31. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Testable scenario for relativity with minimum length,” Physics Letters B, vol. 510, no. 1-4, pp. 255–263, 2001.
  32. A. A. Araújo Filho and R. Maluf, “Thermodynamic properties in higher-derivative electrodynamics,” Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 51, pp. 820–830, 2021.
  33. R. Casana, M. M. Ferreira Jr, and J. S. Rodrigues, “Lorentz-violating contributions of the carroll-field-jackiw model to the cmb anisotropy,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 12, p. 125013, 2008.
  34. R. Casana, M. M. Ferreira Jr, J. S. Rodrigues, and M. R. Silva, “Finite temperature behavior of the c p t-even and parity-even electrodynamics of the standard model extension,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 8, p. 085026, 2009.
  35. A. A. Araújo Filho and A. Y. Petrov, “Higher-derivative lorentz-breaking dispersion relations: a thermal description,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 81, no. 9, p. 843, 2021.
  36. A. A. Araújo Filho and J. Reis, “Thermal aspects of interacting quantum gases in lorentz-violating scenarios,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 136, pp. 1–30, 2021.
  37. J. Furtado, A. Ramos, and J. Assunção, “Effects of lorentz violation in the bose-einstein condensation,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 132, no. 3, p. 31001, 2020.
  38. J. Furtado, J. Assunção, and A. Ramos, “Bose-einstein condensation in hořava-lifshitz theory,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 134, no. 1, p. 11003, 2021.
  39. J. Furtado, J. Assunção, and C. Muniz, “Relativistic bose-einstein condensate in the rainbow gravity,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 139, no. 2, p. 29001, 2022.
  40. D. Colladay and P. McDonald, “Statistical mechanics and lorentz violation,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 12, p. 125007, 2004.
  41. M. Anacleto, F. Brito, E. Maciel, A. Mohammadi, E. Passos, W. Santos, and J. Santos, “Lorentz-violating dimension-five operator contribution to the black body radiation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 785, pp. 191–196, 2018.
  42. A. Aguirre, G. Flores-Hidalgo, R. Rana, and E. Souza, “The lorentz-violating real scalar field at thermal equilibrium,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 81, no. 5, p. 459, 2021.
  43. A. A. Araújo Filho and A. Y. Petrov, “Bouncing universe in a heat bath,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 36, p. 2150242, 2021.
  44. A. A. Araújo Filho, “Particles in loop quantum gravity formalism: a thermodynamical description,” Annalen der Physik, p. 2200383, 2022.
  45. A. A. Araújo Filho, “Thermodynamics of massless particles in curved spacetime,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.00066, 2021.
  46. A. A. Araújo Filho, “Lorentz-violating scenarios in a thermal reservoir,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2021.
  47. J. Assunção, J. Furtado, and T. Mariz, “Nonanalyticity of the non-abelian five-dimensional chern-simons term,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 134, no. 4, p. 41002, 2021.
  48. A. A. Araújo Filho, S. Zare, P. Porfírio, J. Kříž, and H. Hassanabadi, “Thermodynamics and evaporation of a modified schwarzschild black hole in a non–commutative gauge theory,” Physics Letters B, p. 137744, 2023.
  49. R. R. Oliveira, A. A. Araújo Filho, F. C. Lima, R. V. Maluf, and C. A. Almeida, “Thermodynamic properties of an aharonov-bohm quantum ring,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 134, no. 10, p. 495, 2019.
  50. R. Oliveira, A. A. Araújo Filho, R. Maluf, and C. Almeida, “The relativistic aharonov–bohm–coulomb system with position-dependent mass,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 53, no. 4, p. 045304, 2020.
  51. R. Oliveira et al., “Thermodynamic properties of neutral dirac particles in the presence of an electromagnetic field,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.
  52. K. K. Nandi, A. A. Potapov, R. Izmailov, A. Tamang, and J. C. Evans, “Stability and instability of ellis and phantom wormholes: Are there ghosts?,” Physical Review D, vol. 93, no. 10, p. 104044, 2016.
  53. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Quantum-spacetime phenomenology,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, pp. 1–137, 2013.
  54. Y. Ling, B. Hu, and X. Li, “Modified dispersion relations and black hole physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 8, p. 087702, 2006.
  55. L. Smolin, “The case for background independence,” The structural foundations of quantum gravity, pp. 196–239, 2006.
  56. J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Introduction to doubly special relativity,” in Planck Scale Effects in Astrophysics and Cosmology, pp. 131–159, Springer, 2005.
  57. D. Mattingly, “Modern tests of lorentz invariance,” Living Reviews in relativity, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–84, 2005.
  58. F. Girelli, S. Liberati, and L. Sindoni, “Emergence of lorentzian signature and scalar gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 4, p. 044019, 2009.
  59. U. Jacob and T. Piran, “Lorentz-violation-induced arrival delays of cosmological particles,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2008, no. 01, p. 031, 2008.
  60. M. Galaverni and G. Sigl, “Lorentz violation for photons and ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays,” Physical review letters, vol. 100, no. 2, p. 021102, 2008.
  61. L. Anchordoqui, T. Paul, S. Reucroft, and J. Swain, “Ultrahigh energy cosmic rays: The state of the art before the auger observatory,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 2229–2366, 2003.
  62. A. A. Araújo Filho, J. Furtado, H. Hassanabadi, and J. A. S. S. Reis, “Thermal analysis of photon-like particles in rainbow gravity,” Physics of the Dark Universe, vol. 42, no. 101310, 2023.
  63. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  64. A. A. Araújo Filho, J. Reis, and S. Ghosh, “Fermions on a torus knot,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 137, no. 5, p. 614, 2022.
  65. J. Reis, S. Ghosh, et al., “Quantum gases on a torus,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.08017, 2022.
  66. H. Hassanabadi, J. Reis, L. Lisboa-Santos, et al., “Thermodynamics of a quantum ring modified by lorentz violation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11744, 2022.
  67. R. Humphries, P. James, and G. Luckhurst, “Molecular field treatment of nematic liquid crystals,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2: Molecular and Chemical Physics, vol. 68, pp. 1031–1044, 1972.
  68. V. Sreedhar, “The classical and quantum mechanics of a particle on a knot,” Annals of Physics, vol. 359, pp. 20–30, 2015.
  69. P. Das, S. Pramanik, and S. Ghosh, “Particle on a torus knot: Constrained dynamics and semi-classical quantization in a magnetic field,” Annals of Physics, vol. 374, pp. 67–83, 2016.
  70. P. J. Wojtowicz and M. Rayl, “Phase transitions of an isotropic ferromagnet in an external magnetic field,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 20, no. 26, p. 1489, 1968.
  71. D. Ter Haar and M. Lines, “A molecular-field theory of anisotropic ferromagnetica,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 254, no. 1046, pp. 521–555, 1962.
  72. A. A. Araújo-Filho, F. L. Silva, A. Righi, M. B. da Silva, B. P. Silva, E. W. Caetano, and V. N. Freire, “Structural, electronic and optical properties of monoclinic na2ti3o7 from density functional theory calculations: A comparison with xrd and optical absorption measurements,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 250, pp. 68–74, 2017.
  73. F. L. R. e. Silva, A. A. A. Filho, M. B. da Silva, K. Balzuweit, J.-L. Bantignies, E. W. S. Caetano, R. L. Moreira, V. N. Freire, and A. Righi, “Polarized raman, ftir, and dft study of na2ti3o7 microcrystals,” Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 538–548, 2018.
  74. A. A. Araújo Filho and J. Reis, “How does geometry affect quantum gases?,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 37, no. 11n12, p. 2250071, 2022.
  75. J. Reis et al., “Thermal aspects of interacting quantum gases in lorentz-violating scenarios,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 1–30, 2021.
Citations (19)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up