Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Emergent spinor fields from exotic spin structures

Published 16 Feb 2023 in hep-th, math-ph, and math.MP | (2302.08473v3)

Abstract: The classification of emergent spinor fields according to modified bilinear covariants is scrutinized, in spacetimes with nontrivial topology, which induce inequivalent spin structures. Extended Clifford algebras, constructed by equipping the underlying spacetime with an extended bilinear form with additional terms coming from the nontrivial topology, naturally yield emergent extended algebraic spinor fields and their subsequent extended bilinear covariants, which are contrasted to the classical spinor classification. An unexpected duality between the standard and the exotic spinor field classes is therefore established, showing that a complementary fusion process among the spinor field classes sets in, when extended Clifford bundles are addressed in multiply-connected spacetimes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. J. Vaz Jr. and R. da Rocha, “An Introduction to Clifford Algebras and Spinors,” Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2016.
  2. C. Chevalley, “The Algebraic Theory of Spinors”, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1954.
  3. P. Lounesto, “Clifford Algebras and Spinors”, Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 239 (1997) 1.
  4. L. Bonora and R. da Rocha, JHEP 01 (2016) 133 [arXiv:1508.01357 [hep-th]].
  5. R. T. Cavalcanti, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23 (2014) 1444002 [arXiv:1408.0720 [hep-th]].
  6. L. Fabbri, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 062501 [arXiv:1104.5002 [gr-qc]].
  7. P. Meert and R. da Rocha, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 1012 [arXiv:1809.01104 [hep-th]].
  8. D. Beghetto and J. M. Hoff da Silva, EPL 119 (2017) 40006 [arXiv:1710.07086 [math-ph]].
  9. R. da Rocha and A. A. Tomaz, J. Phys. A 53 (2020) 465201 [arXiv:2003.03619 [hep-th]].
  10. C. J. Isham, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 364 (1978) 591.
  11. S. J. Avis and C. J. Isham, Nucl. Phys. B 156 (1979) 441.
  12. C. J. Isham, Proc. R. Soc. London A 362 (1978) 383.
  13. R. P. Geroch, J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968) 1739.
  14. R. P. Geroch, J. Math. Phys. 11 (1970) 343.
  15. S. W. Hawking and C. N. Pope, Phys. Lett. B 73 (1978) 42.
  16. S. W. Hawking, Nucl. Phys. B 144 (1978) 349.
  17. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 276 (1986) 272.
  18. S. J. Avis and C. J. Isham, Commun. Math. Phys. 72 (1980) 103.
  19. S. M. Christensen and M. J. Duff, Nucl. Phys. B 146 (1978) 11.
  20. H. R. Petry, J. Math. Phys. 20 (1979) 231.
  21. M. Luscher, Phys. Lett. B 70 (1977) 321.
  22. R. Sasaki, Phys. Lett. B 80 (1978) 61.
  23. B. M. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 3015.
  24. S. D. Unwin, J. Phys. A 12 (1979) L309.
  25. S. D. Unwin, J. Phys. A 13 (1980) 313.
  26. L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 933.
  27. L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 949.
  28. L. Fabbri and R. J. B. Rogerio, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 880 [arXiv:2004.14155 [physics.gen-ph]].
  29. R. da Rocha and J. G. Pereira, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16 (2007) 1653 [arXiv:gr-qc/0703076 [gr-qc]].
  30. J. P. Crawford, J. Math. Phys. 26 (1985) 1439.
  31. P. R. Holland, Found. Phys. 16 (1986) 708.
  32. R. A. Mosna and J. Vaz, Phys. Lett. A 315 (2003) 418 [arXiv:quant-ph/0303072].
  33. Y. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 2169.
  34. Y. Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69 (1983) 369.
  35. R. A. Mosna and W. A. Rodrigues J. Math. Phys. 45 (2004) 2945 [arXiv:math-ph/0212033 [math-ph]].

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.