Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Thinking Upstream: Ethics and Policy Opportunities in AI Supply Chains

Published 13 Mar 2023 in cs.CY | (2303.07529v2)

Abstract: After children were pictured sewing its running shoes in the early 1990s, Nike at first disavowed the "working conditions in its suppliers' factories", before public pressure led them to take responsibility for ethics in their upstream supply chain. In 2023, OpenAI responded to criticism that Kenyan workers were paid less than $2 per hour to filter traumatic content from its ChatGPT model by stating in part that it had outsourced the work to a subcontractor, who managed workers' payment and mental health concerns. In this position paper, we argue that policy interventions for AI Ethics must consider AI as a supply chain problem, given how the political economy and intra-firm relations structure AI production, in particular examining opportunities upstream.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. 2023. Exclusive: The $2 Per Hour Workers Who Made ChatGPT Safer. https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/.
  2. Judgment Call the Game: Using value sensitive design and design fiction to surface ethical concerns related to technology. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference - DIS ’19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323697
  3. Carlos Munoz Ferrandis. 2022. OpenRAIL: Towards Open and Responsible AI Licensing Frameworks. https://huggingface.co/blog/open_rail.
  4. Behavioral use licensing for responsible AI. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 778–788.
  5. Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler. 2018. Anatomy of an AI System. https://anatomyof.ai/
  6. Montreal Declaration. 2018. The Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence.
  7. David J. Doorey. 2011. The Transparent Supply Chain: From Resistance to Implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics 103, 4 (Nov. 2011), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0882-1
  8. Casey Fiesler. 2018. Black Mirror, Light Mirror: Teaching Technology Ethics Through Speculation. https://howwegettonext.com/the-black-mirror-writers-room-teaching-technology-ethics-through-speculation-f1a9e2deccf4
  9. Casey Fiesler and Natalie Garrett. 2020. Ethical Tech Starts with Addressing Ethical Debt. (2020).
  10. Marti Flacks and Madeleine Songy. Mon, 06/27/2022 - 12:00. The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act Goes into Effect. (Mon, 06/27/2022 - 12:00).
  11. Sakiko Fukuda-Parr and Elizabeth Gibbons. 2021. Emerging Consensus on ‘Ethical AI’: Human Rights Critique of Stakeholder Guidelines. Global Policy 12, S6 (2021), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12965
  12. Ben Gansky and Sean McDonald. 2022. CounterFAccTual: How FAccT undermines its organizing principles. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 1982–1992.
  13. Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. In 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
  14. Seda Gürses and Joris van Hoboken. 2018. Privacy after the Agile Turn. Cambridge, 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316831960.032
  15. Global Reporting Initiative. 0. GRI Standards - English. https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards-english-language/ [Online; accessed 2022-07-09].
  16. Nir Kaissar. 2022. Institutional Investors Are Flexing Their ESG Muscles. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-04-13/institutional-investors-are-flexing-their-esg-muscles [Online; accessed 2022-07-09].
  17. A mulching proposal: Analysing and improving an algorithmic system for turning the elderly into high-nutrient slurry. In Extended Abstracts Of ACM Conference On Human Factors In Computing Systems. 1–11.
  18. An Action-Oriented AI Policy Toolkit for Technology Audits by Community Advocates and Activists. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event, Canada) (FAccT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 772–781. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445938
  19. Alexander Kriebitz and Raphael Max. 2020. The Xinjiang Case and Its Implications from a Business Ethics Perspective. Human Rights Review 21, 3 (Sept. 2020), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00591-0
  20. Nikolas Martelaro and Wendy Ju. 2020. What could go wrong? Exploring the downsides of autonomous vehicles. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 99–101.
  21. Deirdre K Mulligan and Kenneth A Bamberger. 2019. Procurement as policy: Administrative process for machine learning. Berkeley Tech. LJ 34 (2019), 773.
  22. Philipp Schreck. 2013. Disclosure (CSR Reporting). In Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, Samuel O Idowu, Nicholas Capaldi, Liangrong Zu, and Das Ananda Gupta (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8
  23. Value Cards: An Educational Toolkit for Teaching Social Impacts of Machine Learning through Deliberation. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, Virtual Event Canada, 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445971
  24. Katie Shilton. 2013. Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values 38, 3 (2013), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912436985
  25. David Gray Widder and Dawn Nafus. 2022. Dislocated Accountabilities in the AI Supply Chain: Modularity and Developers’ Notions of Responsibility. (Sept. 2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.09780
  26. Limits and Possibilities for “Ethical AI” in Open Source: A Study of Deepfakes. In conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency.
  27. Richmond Y Wong. 2021. Tactics of Soft Resistance in User Experience Professionals’ Values Work. Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–28.
  28. Privacy Legislation as Business Risks: How GDPR and CCPA are Represented in Technology Companies’ Investment Risk Disclosures. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (2023).
  29. Richmond Y. Wong and Deirdre K. Mulligan. 2019. Bringing Design to the Privacy Table: Broadening ”Design” in ”Privacy by Design” Through the Lens of HCI. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300492
  30. Explainability Case Studies. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2009.00246
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.