Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Master Stability Functions of Networks of Izhikevich Neurons

Published 24 Mar 2023 in nlin.CD | (2303.13921v2)

Abstract: Synchronization has attracted the interest of many areas where the systems under study can be described by complex networks. Among such areas is neuroscience, where is hypothesized that synchronization plays a role in many functions and dysfunctions of the brain. We study the linear stability of synchronized states in networks of Izhikevich neurons using Master Stability Functions, and to accomplish that, we exploit the formalism of saltation matrices. Such a tool allows us to calculate the Lyapunov exponents of the Master Stability Function (MSF) properly since the Izhikevich model displays a discontinuity within its spikes. We consider both electrical and chemical couplings, as well as total and partially synchronized states. The MSFs calculations are compared with a measure of the synchronization error for simulated networks. We give special attention to the case of electric and chemical coupling, where a riddled basin of attraction makes the synchronized solution more sensitive to perturbations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, J. Physiol. 117, 500 (1952).
  2. E. M. Izhikevich, IEEE Trans. Neural Net. 14, 1569 (2003).
  3. E. M. Izhikevich and G. M. Edelman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 3593 (2008).
  4. J. Modolo, E. Mosekilde, and A. Beuter, J. of Physiol. Paris 101, 56 (2007).
  5. G. Buzsaki, Rhythms of the Brain (Oxford University Press, 2006).
  6. P. Uhlhaas and W. Singer, Neuron 52, 155 (2006).
  7. J. R. Cohen and M. D’Esposito, J. Neurosci. 36, 12083 (2016).
  8. Brain Res. Rev. 52, 170 (2006).
  9. P. Fries, Annu. Rev. of Neurosci. 32, 209 (2009).
  10. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2109 (1998).
  11. T. Nishikawa and A. E. Motter, Phys. Rev. E 73, 065106 (2006).
  12. J. Sun, E. M. Bollt, and T. Nishikawa, Europhys. Lett. 73, 60011 (2009).
  13. Y. Zhang, V. Latora, and A. E. Motter, Commun. Phys. 4 (2021).
  14. I. Shimada and T. Nagashima, Prog. Theor. Phys. 61, 1605 (1979).
  15. F. Bizzari, A. Brambilla, and G. S. Gajani, J. Comput. Neurosci. 35, 201 (2013).
  16. D. H. Perkel, b. Mulloney, and R. W. Budelli, Neuroscience 6, 823 (1981).
  17. D. Somers and N. Kopell, Biol. Cybern. 68, 393 (1993).
  18. U. Feudel, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 18, 1607 (2008).
  19. J. F. Heagy, T. L. Carroll, and L. M. Pecora, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994).
  20. E. Ott and J. C. Sommerer, Phys. Lett. A 188, 39 (1994).
  21. D. M. Cardoso, C. Delorme, and P. Rama, Eur. J. Comb. 28, 665 (2007).
  22. E. H. Moore, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc 26, 394 (1920).
  23. R. Penrose, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 51, 406 (1955).
  24. D. J. Gauthier and J. C. Bienfang, Intermittent loss of synchronization in coupled chaotic oscillators: toward a new criterion for high-quality synchronization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1751 (1996).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.