Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exotic Tetraquark states with two $\bar{b}$-quarks and $J^P=0^+$ and $1^+$ $B_s$ states in a nonperturbatively-tuned Lattice NRQCD setup

Published 30 Mar 2023 in hep-lat and hep-ph | (2303.17295v1)

Abstract: We use $n_f=2+1$ Wilson-clover gauge-field ensembles from the CLS consortium in a Lattice NRQCD setup to predict the binding energy of a $I(JP)=0(1+)$ $ud\bar{b}\bar{b}$ tetraquark and a $\frac{1}{2}(1+)$ $\ell s\bar{b}\bar{b}$ tetraquark. We determine the binding energies with respect to the relevant $BB*$ and $B_sB*$ thresholds respectively to be $112.0(13.2)$ MeV for the $ud\bar{b}\bar{b}$, and $46.4(12.3)$ MeV for the $\ell s\bar{b}\bar{b}$. We also determine the ground-state $JP=0+$ $B_{s0}*$ and $1+$ $B_{s1}$ mesons to lie $75.4(14.0)$ and $78.7(13.9)$ MeV below the $BK$ and $B*K$ thresholds respectively. Our errors are entirely dominated by systematics due to discretisation effects. To achieve these measurements, we performed a neural network based nonperturbative tuning of the Lattice NRQCD Hamiltonian's parameters against the basic bottomonium spectrum. For all lattice spacings considered we can reproduce the continuum splittings of low-lying bottomonia. It is worth remarking that our nonperturbative tuning parameters deviate from 1 by significant amounts, particularly the term $c_2$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (92)
  1. D. G. Richards, D. K. Sinclair, and D. W. Sivers, Lattice QCD simulation of meson exchange forces, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3191 (1990).
  2. A. M. Green and P. Pennanen, An Interquark potential model for multiquark systems, Phys. Rev. C 57, 3384 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9804003 .
  3. C. Stewart and R. Koniuk, Hadronic molecules in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5581 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9803003 .
  4. P. Pennanen, C. Michael, and A. M. Green (UKQCD), Interactions of heavy light mesons, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 83, 200 (2000), arXiv:hep-lat/9908032 .
  5. W. Detmold, K. Orginos, and M. J. Savage, BB Potentials in Quenched Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 76, 114503 (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0703009 .
  6. Z. S. Brown and K. Orginos, Tetraquark bound states in the heavy-light heavy-light system, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114506 (2012), arXiv:1210.1953 [hep-lat] .
  7. M. Wagner (ETM), Static-static-light-light tetraquarks in lattice QCD, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 4, 747 (2011), arXiv:1103.5147 [hep-lat] .
  8. P. Bicudo and M. Wagner (European Twisted Mass), Lattice QCD signal for a bottom-bottom tetraquark, Phys. Rev. D 87, 114511 (2013), arXiv:1209.6274 [hep-ph] .
  9. P. Bicudo, J. Scheunert, and M. Wagner, Including heavy spin effects in the prediction of a b¯⁢b¯⁢u⁢d¯𝑏¯𝑏𝑢𝑑\bar{b}\bar{b}udover¯ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG over¯ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG italic_u italic_d tetraquark with lattice QCD potentials, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034502 (2017), arXiv:1612.02758 [hep-lat] .
  10. P. Junnarkar, N. Mathur, and M. Padmanath, Study of doubly heavy tetraquarks in Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034507 (2019), arXiv:1810.12285 [hep-lat] .
  11. P. Mohanta and S. Basak, Construction of b⁢b⁢u¯⁢d¯𝑏𝑏¯𝑢¯𝑑bb\bar{u}\bar{d}italic_b italic_b over¯ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG over¯ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG tetraquark states on lattice with NRQCD bottom and HISQ up and down quarks, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094516 (2020), arXiv:2008.11146 [hep-lat] .
  12. J. Carlson, L. Heller, and J. A. Tjon, Stability of Dimesons, Phys. Rev. D 37, 744 (1988).
  13. C. Semay and B. Silvestre-Brac, Diquonia and potential models, Z. Phys. C 61, 271 (1994).
  14. D. M. Brink and F. Stancu, Tetraquarks with heavy flavors, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6778 (1998).
  15. M. Zhang, H. X. Zhang, and Z. Y. Zhang, QQ anti-q anti-q four-quark bound states in chiral SU(3) quark model, Commun. Theor. Phys. 50, 437 (2008), arXiv:0711.1029 [nucl-th] .
  16. S. H. Lee and S. Yasui, Stable multiquark states with heavy quarks in a diquark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 283 (2009), arXiv:0901.2977 [hep-ph] .
  17. Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the axialvector doubly heavy tetraquark states with QCD sum rules, Acta Phys. Polon. B 49, 1781 (2018), arXiv:1708.04545 [hep-ph] .
  18. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Discovery of doubly-charmed Ξc⁢csubscriptΞ𝑐𝑐\Xi_{cc}roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT baryon implies a stable (b⁢b⁢u¯⁢d¯𝑏𝑏¯𝑢¯𝑑bb\bar{u}\bar{d}italic_b italic_b over¯ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG over¯ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG) tetraquark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 202001 (2017), arXiv:1707.07666 [hep-ph] .
  19. E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg, Heavy-quark symmetry implies stable heavy tetraquark mesons Qi⁢Qj⁢q¯k⁢q¯lsubscript𝑄𝑖subscript𝑄𝑗subscript¯𝑞𝑘subscript¯𝑞𝑙Q_{i}Q_{j}\bar{q}_{k}\bar{q}_{l}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 202002 (2017), arXiv:1707.09575 [hep-ph] .
  20. A. Czarnecki, B. Leng, and M. B. Voloshin, Stability of tetrons, Phys. Lett. B 778, 233 (2018), arXiv:1708.04594 [hep-ph] .
  21. T. Mehen, Implications of Heavy Quark-Diquark Symmetry for Excited Doubly Heavy Baryons and Tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094028 (2017), arXiv:1708.05020 [hep-ph] .
  22. L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Hydrogen bond of QCD in doubly heavy baryons and tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100, 074002 (2019), arXiv:1908.03244 [hep-ph] .
  23. Q.-F. Lü, D.-Y. Chen, and Y.-B. Dong, Masses of doubly heavy tetraquarks TQ⁢Q′subscript𝑇𝑄superscript𝑄′T_{QQ^{\prime}}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in a relativized quark model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034012 (2020), arXiv:2006.08087 [hep-ph] .
  24. E. Braaten, L.-P. He, and A. Mohapatra, Masses of doubly heavy tetraquarks with error bars, Phys. Rev. D 103, 016001 (2021), arXiv:2006.08650 [hep-ph] .
  25. X.-Z. Weng, W.-Z. Deng, and S.-L. Zhu, Doubly heavy tetraquarks in an extended chromomagnetic model *, Chin. Phys. C 46, 013102 (2022), arXiv:2108.07242 [hep-ph] .
  26. R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, and E. M. Savchenko, Heavy tetraquarks in the relativistic quark model, Universe 7, 94 (2021), arXiv:2103.01763 [hep-ph] .
  27. C. Deng and S.-L. Zhu, Tcc+ and its partners, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054015 (2022), arXiv:2112.12472 [hep-ph] .
  28. Y. Kim, M. Oka, and K. Suzuki, Doubly heavy tetraquarks in a chiral-diquark picture, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074021 (2022), arXiv:2202.06520 [hep-ph] .
  29. S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, and M. Wagner, Search for b¯b¯us and b¯c¯ud tetraquark bound states using lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034507 (2022), arXiv:2205.13982 [hep-lat] .
  30. B. Silvestre-Brac and C. Semay, Systematics of L = 0 q-2 anti-q-2 systems, Z. Phys. C 57, 273 (1993).
  31. W. Park, S. Noh, and S. H. Lee, Masses of the doubly heavy tetraquarks in a constituent quark model, Nucl. Phys. A 983, 1 (2019), arXiv:1809.05257 [nucl-th] .
  32. C. Deng, H. Chen, and J. Ping, Systematical investigation on the stability of doubly heavy tetraquark states, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 9 (2020), arXiv:1811.06462 [hep-ph] .
  33. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
  34. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Observation of a narrow meson decaying to Ds+⁢π0superscriptsubscript𝐷𝑠superscript𝜋0D_{s}^{+}\pi^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at a mass of 2.32-GeV/c22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 242001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0304021 .
  35. D. Besson et al. (CLEO), Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46-GeV/c**2 decaying to D*+(s) pi0 and confirmation of the D*(sJ)(2317) state, Phys. Rev. D 68, 032002 (2003), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 119908 (2007)], arXiv:hep-ex/0305100 .
  36. E. B. Gregory et al., Precise B,Bs𝐵subscript𝐵𝑠B,B_{s}italic_B , italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Bcsubscript𝐵𝑐B_{c}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT meson spectroscopy from full lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014506 (2011), arXiv:1010.3848 [hep-lat] .
  37. M. Wurtz, R. Lewis, and R. M. Woloshyn, Free-form smearing for bottomonium and B meson spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054504 (2015), arXiv:1505.04410 [hep-lat] .
  38. J. Koponen (UKQCD), Energies of Bssubscript𝐵𝑠B_{s}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT meson excited states: A Lattice study, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074509 (2008), arXiv:0708.2807 [hep-lat] .
  39. A. H. Orsland and H. Hogaasen, Strong and electromagnetic decays for excited heavy mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 503 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9812347 .
  40. W. A. Bardeen, E. J. Eichten, and C. T. Hill, Chiral multiplets of heavy - light mesons, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054024 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305049 .
  41. E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, On Heavy light meson resonances and chiral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 582, 39 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307133 .
  42. F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, and H.-C. Chiang, Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B 647, 133 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610008 .
  43. A. M. Badalian, Y. A. Simonov, and M. A. Trusov, The Chiral transitions in heavy-light mesons, Phys. Rev. D 77, 074017 (2008), arXiv:0712.3943 [hep-ph] .
  44. J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, and F. Fernandez, B meson spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 77, 017501 (2008), arXiv:0711.2359 [hep-ph] .
  45. V. Dmitrasinovic, Chiral symmetry of heavy-light scalar mesons with UA⁢(1)subscript𝑈𝐴1U_{A}(1)italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 ) symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 86, 016006 (2012).
  46. M. Altenbuchinger, L. S. Geng, and W. Weise, Scattering lengths of Nambu-Goldstone bosons off D𝐷Ditalic_D mesons and dynamically generated heavy-light mesons, Phys. Rev. D 89, 014026 (2014), arXiv:1309.4743 [hep-ph] .
  47. J. M. Torres-Rincon, L. Tolos, and O. Romanets, Open bottom states and the B¯¯𝐵\bar{B}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG-meson propagation in hadronic matter, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074042 (2014), arXiv:1403.1371 [hep-ph] .
  48. Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the masses and decay constants of the heavy-light mesons with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 427 (2015), arXiv:1506.01993 [hep-ph] .
  49. H.-Y. Cheng and F.-S. Yu, Masses of Scalar and Axial-Vector B Mesons Revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 668 (2017), arXiv:1704.01208 [hep-ph] .
  50. M. H. Alhakami, Predictions for the beauty meson spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034009 (2021), arXiv:2006.16878 [hep-ph] .
  51. S. Godfrey and R. Kokoski, The Properties of p Wave Mesons with One Heavy Quark, Phys. Rev. D 43, 1679 (1991).
  52. T. A. Lahde, C. J. Nyfalt, and D. O. Riska, Spectra and M1 decay widths of heavy light mesons, Nucl. Phys. A 674, 141 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9908485 .
  53. M. Di Pierro and E. Eichten, Excited Heavy - Light Systems and Hadronic Transitions, Phys. Rev. D 64, 114004 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0104208 .
  54. O. Lakhina and E. S. Swanson, A Canonical Ds(2317)?, Phys. Lett. B 650, 159 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608011 .
  55. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Heavy-light meson spectroscopy and Regge trajectories in the relativistic quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 66, 197 (2010), arXiv:0910.5612 [hep-ph] .
  56. S. Godfrey, K. Moats, and E. S. Swanson, B𝐵Bitalic_B and Bssubscript𝐵𝑠B_{s}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Meson Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054025 (2016), arXiv:1607.02169 [hep-ph] .
  57. A. X. El-Khadra, A. S. Kronfeld, and P. B. Mackenzie, Massive fermions in lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3933 (1997), arXiv:hep-lat/9604004 .
  58. N. H. Christ, M. Li, and H.-W. Lin, Relativistic Heavy Quark Effective Action, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074505 (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0608006 .
  59. M. B. Oktay and A. S. Kronfeld, New lattice action for heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D 78, 014504 (2008), arXiv:0803.0523 [hep-lat] .
  60. J. Heitger and R. Sommer (ALPHA), Nonperturbative heavy quark effective theory, JHEP 02, 022, arXiv:hep-lat/0310035 .
  61. B. Blossier et al. (ETM), A Proposal for B-physics on current lattices, JHEP 04, 049, arXiv:0909.3187 [hep-lat] .
  62. S. Meinel, Bottomonium spectrum at order v6superscript𝑣6v^{6}italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT from domain-wall lattice QCD: Precise results for hyperfine splittings, Phys. Rev. D 82, 114502 (2010), arXiv:1007.3966 [hep-lat] .
  63. G. P. Lepage and P. B. Mackenzie, On the viability of lattice perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2250 (1993), arXiv:hep-lat/9209022 .
  64. P. Lepage, Perturbative improvement for lattice QCD: An Update, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 60, 267 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9707026 .
  65. C. J. Morningstar, Radiative corrections to the kinetic couplings in nonrelativistic lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5902 (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9406002 .
  66. C. J. Morningstar, The Heavy quark selfenergy in nonrelativistic lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2265 (1993), arXiv:hep-lat/9301005 .
  67. N. Mathur, R. Lewis, and R. M. Woloshyn, Charmed and bottom baryons from lattice NRQCD, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014502 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0203253 .
  68. A. V. Manohar, The HQET / NRQCD Lagrangian to order alpha / m-3, Phys. Rev. D 56, 230 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9701294 .
  69. R. Lewis and R. M. Woloshyn, O(1 / M**3) effects for heavy - light mesons in lattice NRQCD, Phys. Rev. D 58, 074506 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9803004 .
  70. S. Meinel, Excited-state spectroscopy of triply-bottom baryons from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114510 (2012), arXiv:1202.1312 [hep-lat] .
  71. P. F. Bedaque, Aharonov-Bohm effect and nucleon nucleon phase shifts on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 593, 82 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0402051 .
  72. C. T. Sachrajda and G. Villadoro, Twisted boundary conditions in lattice simulations, Phys. Lett. B 609, 73 (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0411033 .
  73. Fixed to a precision of 10−14superscript101410^{-14}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT using the FACG algorithm [142].
  74. P. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  75. S. Meinel, The Bottomonium spectrum from lattice QCD with 2+1 flavors of domain wall fermions, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094501 (2009), arXiv:0903.3224 [hep-lat] .
  76. R. J. Hudspith and D. Mohler, A fully non-perturbative charm-quark tuning using machine learning, Arxiv  (2021), arXiv:2112.01997 [hep-lat] .
  77. This was tested on our lightest pion-mass ensemble (C101) to be the case.
  78. M. Luscher and S. Schaefer, Lattice QCD with open boundary conditions and twisted-mass reweighting, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 519 (2013), arXiv:1206.2809 [hep-lat] .
  79. M. Bruno et al., Simulation of QCD with N=f{}_{f}=start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT = 2 +++ 1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions, JHEP 02, 043, arXiv:1411.3982 [hep-lat] .
  80. M. Bruno, T. Korzec, and S. Schaefer, Setting the scale for the CLS 2+1212+12 + 1 flavor ensembles, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074504 (2017), arXiv:1608.08900 [hep-lat] .
  81. C. Michael and I. Teasdale, Extracting Glueball Masses From Lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 215, 433 (1983).
  82. M. Luscher and U. Wolff, How to Calculate the Elastic Scattering Matrix in Two-dimensional Quantum Field Theories by Numerical Simulation, Nucl. Phys. B 339, 222 (1990).
  83. C. McNeile and C. Michael (UKQCD), The η𝜂\etaitalic_η and η𝜂\etaitalic_η’ mesons in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 491, 123 (2000), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 551, 391–391 (2003)], arXiv:hep-lat/0006020 .
  84. W. Bietenholz et al., Tuning the strange quark mass in lattice simulations, Phys. Lett. B 690, 436 (2010), arXiv:1003.1114 [hep-lat] .
  85. C. Aubin and K. Orginos, A new approach for Delta form factors, AIP Conf. Proc. 1374, 621 (2011), arXiv:1010.0202 [hep-lat] .
  86. S. Aoki et al., Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 112 (2017), arXiv:1607.00299 [hep-lat] .
  87. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), FLAG Review 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 869 (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat] .
  88. We tested that using the CLS continuum value of t0subscript𝑡0t_{0}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT instead produces a negligible shift in our final result.
  89. Neglecting the tiny differences in volume and pion mass between these two ensembles.
  90. We chose the references that attempt to quantify the uncertainty of the calculation. Reference [71] and [76] use Lattice QCD input and are not fully independent of previous lattice results and so we therefore mention them here instead of in the overview plot. The results from [64] are superseded by the results in [75] and we therefore omit the former from the overview plot.
  91. L. Dagum and R. Menon, Openmp: an industry standard api for shared-memory programming, IEEE Computational Science and Engineering 5, 46 (1998).
  92. R. J. Hudspith (RBC, UKQCD), Fourier Accelerated Conjugate Gradient Lattice Gauge Fixing, Comput. Phys. Commun. 187, 115 (2015), arXiv:1405.5812 [hep-lat] .
Citations (13)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.