Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Generalized Volume-Complexity for RN-AdS Black Hole

Published 12 Apr 2023 in hep-th and gr-qc | (2304.05751v3)

Abstract: The connection between quantum information and quantum gravity has captured the imagination of physicists. Recently, a broad new class of gravitational observables have been proposed to provide new possibilities for holographic complexity \cite{Belin:2021bga} , which is an extension of volume in the Complexity=Volume proposal. In this paper, we investigate generalized volume-complexity for the 4-dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m-AdS black hole. These new observables satisfy the characteristic of the thermofield double state, i.e., they grow linearly in time on the late stage. We find that there are multiple extremal hypersurfaces anchored at a certain boundary time. In other words, for the same boundary time, more than one observable (generalized volume-complexity) can exist in the bulk. The size relationship of the observables on the two hypersurfaces changes over time. This will result in the substitution of the maximum extreme hypersurface which is dual to the complexity of the thermofield double state. We call the time when one hypersurface replaces another to become the largest extreme hypersurface the turning time $\tau _{turning}$. That is, a hypersurface dual to the complexity of the thermofield double state defined on the boundary jumps from one branch to another. This discontinuous jump is highly reminiscent of a phase transition, and the turning time denotes the moment at which this phase transition occurs. Our findings propose a discontinuous variation in bulk physics that is dual to the complexity of the thermofield double state defined on the boundary.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (57)
  1. A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S. M. Ruan, G. Sárosi and A. J. Speranza, “Does Complexity Equal Anything?”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) no.8, 081602 [arXiv:2111.02429 [hep-th]].
  2. A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S. M. Ruan, G. Sárosi and A. J. Speranza, “Complexity equals anything II”, JHEP 01 (2023), 154 [arXiv:2210.09647 [hep-th]].
  3. J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231-252 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]].
  4. S. Aaronson, “The Complexity of Quantum States and Transformations: From Quantum Money to Black Holes”, [arXiv:1607.05256 [quant-ph]].
  5. T. Nishioka, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Entanglement Entropy: An Overview”, J. Phys. A 42 (2009), 504008 [arXiv:0905.0932 [hep-th]].
  6. S. Chapman and G. Policastro, “Quantum computational complexity from quantum information to black holes and back”, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) no.2, 128 [arXiv:2110.14672 [hep-th]].
  7. M. Baggioli, K. Y. Kim, L. Li and W. J. Li, “Holographic Axion Model: a simple gravitational tool for quantum matter”, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 (2021) no.7, 270001 [arXiv:2101.01892 [hep-th]].
  8. L. OuYang, D. Wang, X. Qiao, M. Wang, Q. Pan and J. Jing, “Holographic insulator/superconductor phase transitions with excited states”, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 (2021) no.4, 240411 [arXiv:2010.10715 [hep-th]].
  9. T. Faulkner, T. Hartman, M. Headrick, M. Rangamani and B. Swingle, “Snowmass white paper: Quantum information in quantum field theory and quantum gravity”, [arXiv:2203.07117 [hep-th]].
  10. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006), 181602 [arXiv:hep-th/0603001 [hep-th]].
  11. J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes”, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013), 781-811 [arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]].
  12. L. Susskind, “Copenhagen vs Everett, Teleportation, and ER=EPR”, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) no.6-7, 551-564 [arXiv:1604.02589 [hep-th]].
  13. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, “Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors”, JHEP 05 (2013), 014 [arXiv:1303.1080 [hep-th]].
  14. L. Susskind, “Entanglement is not enough”, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016), 49-71 [arXiv:1411.0690 [hep-th]].
  15. D. Stanford and L. Susskind, “Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries”, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) no.12, 126007 [arXiv:1406.2678 [hep-th]].
  16. L. Susskind, “Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons”, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016), 24-43 [arXiv:1403.5695 [hep-th]].
  17. A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, “Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) no.19, 191301 [arXiv:1509.07876 [hep-th]].
  18. A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, “Complexity, action, and black holes”, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) no.8, 086006 [arXiv:1512.04993 [hep-th]].
  19. J. Couch, W. Fischler and P. H. Nguyen, “Noether charge, black hole volume, and complexity”, JHEP 03 (2017), 119 [arXiv:1610.02038 [hep-th]].
  20. Y. G. Miao and L. Zhao, “Complexity-action duality of the shock wave geometry in a massive gravity theory”, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.2, 024035 [arXiv:1708.01779 [hep-th]].
  21. A. Akhavan and F. Omidi, “On the Role of Counterterms in Holographic Complexity”, JHEP 11 (2019), 054 [arXiv:1906.09561 [hep-th]].
  22. F. Omidi, “Regularizations of Action-Complexity for a Pure BTZ Black Hole Microstate”, JHEP 07 (2020), 020 [arXiv:2004.11628 [hep-th]].
  23. M. Bravo-Gaete and F. F. Santos, “Complexity of four-dimensional hairy anti-de-Sitter black holes with a rotating string and shear viscosity in generalized scalar–tensor theories”, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10064-y [arXiv:2010.10942 [hep-th]].
  24. H. Zolfi, “Complexity and Multi-boundary Wormholes in 2 + 1 dimensions”, JHEP 04 (2023), 076 [arXiv:2302.07522 [hep-th]].
  25. A. Reynolds and S. F. Ross, “Complexity in de Sitter Space”, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) no.17, 175013 [arXiv:1706.03788 [hep-th]].
  26. S. Chapman, H. Marrochio and R. C. Myers, “Holographic complexity in Vaidya spacetimes. Part II”, JHEP 06 (2018), 114 [arXiv:1805.07262 [hep-th]].
  27. F. J. G. Abad, M. Kulaxizi and A. Parnachev, “On Complexity of Holographic Flavors”, JHEP 01 (2018), 127 [arXiv:1705.08424 [hep-th]].
  28. Z. Fu, A. Maloney, D. Marolf, H. Maxfield and Z. Wang, “Holographic complexity is nonlocal”, JHEP 02 (2018), 072 [arXiv:1801.01137 [hep-th]].
  29. Y. S. An, R. G. Cai, L. Li and Y. Peng, “Holographic complexity growth in an FLRW universe”, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.4, 046006 [arXiv:1909.12172 [hep-th]].
  30. R. G. Cai, S. He, S. J. Wang and Y. X. Zhang, “Revisit on holographic complexity in two-dimensional gravity”, JHEP 08 (2020), 102 [arXiv:2001.11626 [hep-th]].
  31. R. G. Cai, S. M. Ruan, S. J. Wang, R. Q. Yang and R. H. Peng, “Action growth for AdS black holes”, JHEP 09 (2016), 161 [arXiv:1606.08307 [gr-qc]].
  32. J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter”, JHEP 04 (2003), 021 [arXiv:hep-th/0106112 [hep-th]].
  33. W. D. Guo, S. W. Wei, Y. Y. Li and Y. X. Liu, “Complexity growth rates for AdS black holes in massive gravity and f⁢(R)𝑓𝑅f(R)italic_f ( italic_R ) gravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) no.12, 904 [arXiv:1703.10468 [gr-qc]].
  34. Y. T. Zhou, “Complexity growth of massive neutral BTZ black hole with a null string”, [arXiv:2302.10565 [hep-th]].
  35. Y. T. Zhou, X. M. Kuang and J. P. Wu, “Complexity growth of massive black hole with a probe string”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no.8, 768 [arXiv:2104.12998 [hep-th]].
  36. X. H. Feng and H. S. Liu, “Holographic Complexity Growth Rate in Horndeski Theory”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.1, 40 [arXiv:1811.03303 [hep-th]].
  37. J. Peng and X. H. Feng, “Holographic Aspects of Quasi-topological Gravity”, [arXiv:1802.00697 [hep-th]].
  38. H. Huang, X. H. Feng and H. Lu, “Holographic Complexity and Two Identities of Action Growth”, Phys. Lett. B 769 (2017), 357-361 [arXiv:1611.02321 [hep-th]].
  39. K. Meng, “Holographic complexity of Born–Infeld black holes”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.12, 984 [arXiv:1810.02208 [hep-th]].
  40. R. Auzzi, S. Baiguera, M. Grassi, G. Nardelli and N. Zenoni, “Complexity and action for warped AdS black holes”, JHEP 09 (2018), 013 [arXiv:1806.06216 [hep-th]].
  41. Y. S. An, R. G. Cai and Y. Peng, “Time Dependence of Holographic Complexity in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity”, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.10, 106013 [arXiv:1805.07775 [hep-th]].
  42. D. Momeni, M. Faizal, S. Alsaleh, L. Alasfar, A. Myrzakul and R. Myrzakulov, “Thermodynamic and Holographic Information Dual to Volume”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.9, 765 [arXiv:1704.05785 [hep-th]].
  43. B. Swingle and Y. Wang, “Holographic Complexity of Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton Gravity”, JHEP 09 (2018), 106 [arXiv:1712.09826 [hep-th]].
  44. J. Couch, S. Eccles, T. Jacobson and P. Nguyen, “Holographic Complexity and Volume”, JHEP 11 (2018), 044 [arXiv:1807.02186 [hep-th]].
  45. L. C. Qu, J. Chen and Y. X. Liu, “Chaos and complexity for inverted harmonic oscillators”, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.12, 126015 [arXiv:2111.07351 [hep-th]].
  46. L. C. Qu, H. Y. Jiang and Y. X. Liu, “Chaos and multifold complexity for an inverted harmonic oscillator”, JHEP 12 (2022), 065 [arXiv:2211.04317 [quant-ph]].
  47. D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind, “Localized shocks”, JHEP 03 (2015), 051 [arXiv:1409.8180 [hep-th]].
  48. L. Susskind, “Butterflies on the Stretched Horizon”, [arXiv:1311.7379 [hep-th]].
  49. J. Jiang, Z. Chen and C. Liu, “Switchback effect of holographic complexity in multiple-horizon black holes”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.4, 306 [arXiv:2003.10039 [hep-th]].
  50. A. Ovgün and K. Jusufi, “Complexity growth rates for AdS black holes with dyonic/ nonlinear charge/ stringy hair/ topological defects”, [arXiv:1801.09615 [gr-qc]].
  51. D. Carmi, S. Chapman, H. Marrochio, R. C. Myers and S. Sugishita, “On the Time Dependence of Holographic Complexity”, JHEP 11 (2017), 188 [arXiv:1709.10184 [hep-th]].
  52. K. Goto, H. Marrochio, R. C. Myers, L. Queimada and B. Yoshida, “Holographic Complexity Equals Which Action?”, JHEP 02 (2019), 160 [arXiv:1901.00014 [hep-th]].
  53. S. Jiang and J. Jiang, “Holographic complexity in charged accelerating black holes”, Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021), 136731 [arXiv:2106.09371 [hep-th]].
  54. R. G. Cai, M. Sasaki and S. J. Wang, “Action growth of charged black holes with a single horizon”, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.12, 124002 [arXiv:1702.06766 [gr-qc]].
  55. Y. B. Ma, L. C. Zhang, S. Cao, T. Liu, S. Geng, Y. Liu and Y. Pan, “Entropy of the electrically charged hairy black holes”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.9, 763
  56. J. Jiang and M. Zhang, “Holographic complexity in charged supersymmetric black holes”, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) no.8, 084010 [arXiv:2009.06830 [hep-th]].
  57. S. Roca-Jerat, T. Sancho-Lorente, J. Román-Roche and D. Zueco, “Circuit Complexity through phase transitions: consequences in quantum state preparation”, [arXiv:2301.04671 [quant-ph]].
Citations (6)

Summary

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.