Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Succinct quantum testers for closeness and $k$-wise uniformity of probability distributions

Published 25 Apr 2023 in quant-ph | (2304.12916v4)

Abstract: We explore potential quantum speedups for the fundamental problem of testing the properties of closeness and $k$-wise uniformity of probability distributions. Closeness testing is the problem of distinguishing whether two $n$-dimensional distributions are identical or at least $\varepsilon$-far in $\ell1$- or $\ell2$-distance. We show that the quantum query complexities for $\ell1$- and $\ell2$-closeness testing are $O(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)$ and $O(1/\varepsilon)$, respectively, both of which achieve optimal dependence on $\varepsilon$, improving the prior best results of Gily\'en and Li (2020). $k$-wise uniformity testing is the problem of distinguishing whether a distribution over ${0, 1}n$ is uniform when restricted to any $k$ coordinates or $\varepsilon$-far from any such distributions. We propose the first quantum algorithm for this problem with query complexity $O(\sqrt{nk}/\varepsilon)$, achieving a quadratic speedup over the state-of-the-art classical algorithm with sample complexity $O(nk/\varepsilon2)$ by O'Donnell and Zhao (2018). Moreover, when $k = 2$ our quantum algorithm outperforms any classical one because of the classical lower bound $\Omega(n/\varepsilon2)$. All our quantum algorithms are fairly simple and time-efficient, using only basic quantum subroutines such as amplitude estimation.

Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (3)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.