Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Systematic Improvements in Transmon Qubit Coherence Enabled by Niobium Surface Encapsulation

Published 26 Apr 2023 in quant-ph, cond-mat.mtrl-sci, and cond-mat.supr-con | (2304.13257v3)

Abstract: We present a novel transmon qubit fabrication technique that yields systematic improvements in T$_1$ relaxation times. We fabricate devices using an encapsulation strategy that involves passivating the surface of niobium and thereby preventing the formation of its lossy surface oxide. By maintaining the same superconducting metal and only varying the surface structure, this comparative investigation examining different capping materials, such as tantalum, aluminum, titanium nitride, and gold, and film substrates across different qubit foundries definitively demonstrates the detrimental impact that niobium oxides have on the coherence times of superconducting qubits, compared to native oxides of tantalum, aluminum or titanium nitride. Our surface-encapsulated niobium qubit devices exhibit T$_1$ relaxation times 2 to 5 times longer than baseline niobium qubit devices with native niobium oxides. When capping niobium with tantalum, we obtain median qubit lifetimes above 300 microseconds, with maximum values up to 600 microseconds, that represent the highest lifetimes to date for superconducting qubits prepared on both sapphire and silicon. Our comparative structural and chemical analysis suggests why amorphous niobium oxides may induce higher losses compared to other amorphous oxides. These results are in line with high-accuracy measurements of the niobium oxide loss tangent obtained with ultra-high Q superconducting radiofrequency (SRF) cavities. This new surface encapsulation strategy enables even further reduction of dielectric losses via passivation with ambient-stable materials, while preserving fabrication and scalable manufacturability thanks to the compatibility with silicon processes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. G. Wendin, Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 106001 (2017).
  2. C. Müller, J. H. Cole, and J. Lisenfeld, Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 124501 (2019).
  3. R. McDermott, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 19, 2 (2009).
  4. A. Romanenko and D. I. Schuster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 264801 (2017).
  5. D. Bafia, A. Grassellino, and A. Romanenko, Probing the role of low temperature vacuum baking on photon lifetimes in superconducting niobium 3-d resonators (2021).
  6. J. Burnett, L. Faoro, and T. Lindström, Superconductor Science and Technology 29, 044008 (2016).
  7. J. Knobloch, AIP Conference Proceedings 671, 133 (2003), https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.1597364 .
  8. A. A. Clerk and D. W. Utami, Phys. Rev. A 75, 042302 (2007).
  9. A. Vaaranta, M. Cattaneo, and R. E. Lake, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042605 (2022).
  10. A. Nelson, Journal of Applied Crystallography 39, 273 (2006), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1107/S0021889806005073 .
  11. G. J. Dolan, Applied Physics Letters 31, 337 (1977), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.89690 .
Citations (44)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 30 likes about this paper.