Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Reservoir computing and task performing through using high-$β$ lasers with delayed optical feedback

Published 6 May 2023 in physics.optics and cs.ET | (2305.11878v2)

Abstract: Nonlinear photonic sources including semiconductor lasers have recently been utilized as ideal computation elements for information processing. They supply energy-efficient way and rich dynamics for classification and recognition tasks. In this work, we propose and numerically study the dynamics of complex photonic systems including high-$\beta$ laser element with delayed feedback and functional current modulation, and employ nonlinear laser dynamics of near-threshold region for the application in time-delayed reservoir computing. The results indicate a perfect (100$\%$) recognition accuracy for the pattern recognition task, and an accuracy of about 98$\%$ for the Mackey-Glass chaotic sequences prediction. Therefore, the system shows an improvement of performance with low-power consumption, in particular, the error rate is an order of magnitude smaller in comparison with previous works. Furthermore, by changing the DC pump, we are able to modify the amount of spontaneous emission photons of the system, this then allow us to explore how the laser noise impact the performance of the reservoir computing system. Through manipulating these variables, we show a deeper understanding on the proposed system, which is helpful for the practical applications of reservoir computing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. C. Qian, B. Zheng, Y. Shen, L. Jing, E. Li, L. Shen, and H. Chen, “Deep-learning-enabled self-adaptive microwave cloak without human intervention,” Nat. Photonics 14, 383-390, (2020).
  2. Y. Jia, C. Qian, Z. Fan, T. Cai, E. Li, and H. Chen, “A knowledge-inherited learning for intelligent metasurface design and assembly,” Light: Science & Applications 12, 82 (2023).
  3. J. Zhang, C. Qian, J. Chen, B. Wu, and H. Chen, “Uncertainty qualification for metasurface design with amendatory Bayesian network,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2200807, (2023).
  4. W. Maass, T. Natschläger, and H. Markram, “Real-time computing without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based on perturbations,” Neural Comput., 14(11), 2531-2560, (2002).
  5. H. Jaeger and H. Haas, “Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication,” Science, 304(5667), 78-80, (2004).
  6. X. X. Guo, S. Y. Xiang, Y. H. Zhang, L. Lin, A. J. Wen, and Y. Hao, “Four-channels reservoir computing based on polarization dynamics in mutually coupled VCSELs system,” Opt. Express, 27(16), 23293-23306, (2019).
  7. G. V. der Sande, D. Brunner and M. C. Soriano, “Advances in photonic reservoir computing,” Nanophotonics, 6(3), 561-576, (2017).
  8. K. Vandoorne, J. Dambre, D. Verstraeten, B. Schrauwen and P. Bienstman, “Parallel Reservoir Computing Using Optical Amplifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 22(9), 1469-1481, 2011.
  9. K. Takano, C. Sugano, M. Inubushi, K. Yoshimura, S. Sunada, K. Kanno, and A. Uchida, “Compact reservoir computing with a photonic integrated circuit,” Opt. Express, 26(22), 29424-29439, 2018.
  10. J. Vatin, D. Rontani, M. Sciamanna, “Enhanced performance of a reservoir computer using polarization dynamics in VCSELs,” Opt. Lett., 43(18), 4497-4500, (2018).
  11. L. Appeltant, M. C. Soriano, G. Van der Sande, J. Danckaert, S. Massar, J. Dambre, B. Schrauwen, C.R. Mirasso, and I. Fischer, “Information processing using a single dynamical node as complex system,” Nature Commun., 2, 468, 2011.
  12. D. Brunner, M. C. Soriano, C. R. Mirasso, and I. Fischer, “Parallel photonic information processing at gigabyte per second data rates using transient states,” Nat. Commun., 4, 1364, (2013).
  13. S. Ortín and L. Pesquera, “Reservoir computing with an ensemble of time-delay reservoirs,” Cogn. Comput., 9, 3, 327-336, (2017).
  14. M. Goldmann, F. Köster, K. Lüdge, and S. Yanchuk, “Deep time-delay reservoir computing: Dynamics and memory capacity,” Chaos, 30, 093124, (2020).
  15. F. Stelzer, A. Röhm, K. Lüdge, S. Yanchuk, “Performance boost of time-delay reservoir computing by non-resonant clock cycle,” Neural Networks, 124, 158-169, (2020).
  16. J. Vatin, D. Rontani, and M. Sciamanna, “Experimental reservoir computing using VCSEL polarization dynamics,” Opt. Express, 27, 18579-18584, (2019).
  17. X. X. Guo, S. Y. Xiang , Y. H. Zhang, L. Lin , A. J. Wen, and Y. Hao, “High-speed neuromorphic reservoir computing based on a semiconductor nanolaser with optical feedback under electrical modulation,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 26, 1500707, (2020).
  18. M. C. Soriano, S. Ortín, L. Keuninckx, L. Appeltant, J. Danckaert, L. Pesquera, and G. van der Sande, “Delay-based reservoir computing: noise effects in a combined analog and digital implementation,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 26(2), 388-393, (2015).
  19. T. Hülser, F. Koster, K. Ludge, and L. Jaurigue, “Deriving task specific performance from the information processing capacity of a reservoir computer,” Nanophotonics, 12, 937-947, (2023).
  20. Y. Chen, L. Yi, J. Ke, Z. Yang, Y. Yang, L. Huang, Q. Zhuge, and W. Hu, “Reservoir computing system with double optoelectronic feedback loops,” Opt. Express, 27(20), 27431-27440, (2019).
  21. T. Wang, Z. L. Deng, J. C. Sun, X. H. Wang, G. P. Puccioni, G. F. Wang, and G. L. Lippi, “Photon statistics and dynamics of nanolasers subject to intensity feedback,” Phys. Rew. A, 101, 023803. (2020).
  22. L. Larger, M. C. Soriano, D. Brunner, L. Appeltant, J. M. Gutierrez, L. Pesquera, C. R. Mirasso, I. Fischer, “Photonic information processing beyond Turing: an optoelectronic implementation of reservoir computing,” Opt. Express, 20(3), 3241-3249, (2012).
  23. Z. Li, S. S. Li, X. Zou, W. Pan and L. Yan, “Processing-speed enhancement in a delay-laser-based reservoir,” Photonics, 9, 240, (2022).
  24. Y. K. Chemboa, “Machine learning based on reservoir computing with time-delayed optoelectronic and photonic systems,” Chaos 30, 013111, (2020).
  25. M. N. Ashner, U. Paudel, M. Luengo-Kovac, J. Pilawa, T. Justin Shaw, and G. C. Valley, “Photonic reservoir computer with all-optical reservoir,” Proc. SPIE 11703, AI and Optical Data Sciences II, 117030L (2021).
  26. M. Skontranis, G. Sarantoglou, A. Bogris, and C. Mesaritakis, “Time-delayed reservoir computing based on a dual-waveband quantum-dot spin polarized vertical cavity surface-emitting laser,” Optical Materials Express 12, 4047-4060, (2022).
  27. P. Chen, R. Liu, K. Aihara and L. Chen, “Autoreservoir computing for multistep ahead prediction based on the spatiotemporal information transformation,” Nat. Commun., 11, 4568, (2020).
  28. Y. Xu, M. Zhang, L. Zhang, P. Lu, S. Mihailov, and X. Bao, “Time-delay signature suppression in a chaotic semiconductor laser by fiber random grating induced random distributed feedback,” Opt. Lett. 42, 4107-4110, (2017).
  29. L. Zhang, B. Pan, G. Chen, L. Guo, D. Lu, L. Zhao and W. Wang, “640-Gbit/s fast physical random number generation using a broadband chaotic semiconductor laser,” Sci. Rep. 7, 45900, (2017).
  30. I. Estébanez, J. Schwind, I. Fischer and A. Argyris, “Accelerating photonic computing by bandwidth enhancement of a time-delay reservoir,” Nanophotonics, 9(13), 4163-4171, (2020).
  31. T. Wang, X. Wang, Z. Deng, J. Sun, G. P. Puccioni, G. Wang, and G. L. Lippi, “Dynamics of a micro-VCSEL operated in the threshold region under low-level optical feedback,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25, 1700308, (2019).
  32. T. Wang and G. L. Lippi, “Polarization-resolved cartography of light emission of a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser with high space and frequency resolution,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 181103, (2015).
  33. M. S. Torre, C. Masoller, P. Mandel, and K. A. Shore, “Enhanced sensitivity to current modulation near dynamic instability in semiconductor lasers with optical feedback and optical injection,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 21, 302-306, (2004).
  34. S. Nazhan, Z. Ghassemlooy, K. Busawon, A.Gholami, “Investigation of polarization switching of VCSEL subject to intensity modulated and optical feedback,” Optics &\&& Laser Technology, 75, 240-245, 2015.
  35. H. Deng, G. L. Lippi, J. Mork, J. Wiersig, and S. Reitzenstein, “Physics and Applications of High-β𝛽\betaitalic_β Micro- and Nanolasers,” Adv.Optical Mater. 9, 2100415, 2021.
  36. A. Javanshir, T. T. Nguyen, M. A. Parvez Mahmud, and A. Z. Kouzani, “Advancements in algorithms and neuromorphic hardware for spiking neural networks,” Neural Computation, 34(6), 1289-1328, (2022).
  37. T. Wang, G. P. Puccioni and G. L. Lippi, “Dynamical buildup of lasing in mesoscale devices,” Scientific Reports, 5, 15858, (2015).
  38. T. Wang, C. Jiang, J. Zou, J. Yang, K. Xu, C. Jin, G. Wang, G. P. Puccioni and G. L. Lippi, “Nanolasers with feedback as low-coherence illumination sources for speckle-free imaging: a numerical analysis of the superthermal emission regime,” Nanomaterials, 11, 3325, (2021).
  39. D. Brunner, L. Larger, and M. C. Soriano, “Nonlinear photonic dynamical systems for unconventional computing,” Nonlinear Theory and Its Applications, IEICE, 13, 26-35, 2022.
  40. G. L. Lippi, T. Wang, G. P. Puccioni, “ ’Phase transitions’ in small systems: Why standard threshold definitions fail for nanolasers,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 157, 111850, 2022.
  41. G. P. Puccioni and G. L. Lippi, “Stochastic Simulator for modeling the transition to lasing,” Opt. Express, 23(3), 2369-2374, (2015).
  42. P. R. Rice, H. J. Carmichael, “Photon statistics of a cavity-QED laser: a comment on the laser-phase-transition analogy,” Phys. Rev. A, 50, 4318, (1994).
  43. D. Brunner, M. C. Soriano and G. Van der Sande, “Photonic Reservoir Computing: Optical Recurrent Neural Networks,” Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583496
  44. D. Brunner, M. C. Soriano, C. R. Mirasso, and I. Fischer, “Parallel photonic information processing at gigabyte per second data rates using transient states,” Nat. Commun., 4, 1364, 2013.
  45. D. Yue, Z. Wu, Y. Hou, B. Cui, Y. Jin, M. Dai, and G. Xia, “Performance optimization research of reservoir computing system based on an optical feedback semiconductor laser under electrical information injection,” Opt. Exp., 27(14), 19931-19939, 2019.
  46. D. Yue, Y. Hou, Z. Wu, C. Hu, Z. Xiao, and G. Xia, “Experimental investigation of an optical reservoir computing system based on two parallel time-delay reservoirs,” IEEE Photonics Journal, 13(3), 8500111, 2021.
  47. F. Köster, S. Yanchuk1, and K. Lüdge, “Insight into delay based reservoir computing via eigenvalue analysis,” J. Phys. Photonics, 3, 024011, 2021.
  48. T. Hülser, F. Köster, L. Jaurigue, and K. Lüdge, “Role of delay-times in delay-based photonic reservoir computing,” Opt. Mater. Express, 12, 1214-1231, 2022.
  49. C. Sugano, K. Kanno, and A. Uchida, “Reservoir computing using multiple lasers with feedback on a photonic integrated circuit,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron., 26(1), 1-9, 2020.
  50. J. Taylor, “Introduction to Error Analysis. The study of uncertainties in physical measurements,” 2nd. Sausalito, California: University Science Books, p. 349 (cit. on p. 84), 1997.
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Authors (7)

  1. T. Wang 
  2. C. Jiang 
  3. Q. Fang 
  4. X. Guo 
  5. Y. Zhang 
  6. C. Jin 
  7. S. Xiang 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up