Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On data and dimension in chemistry -- irreversibility, concealment and emergent conservation laws

Published 15 Jun 2023 in cond-mat.stat-mech and physics.chem-ph | (2306.09553v4)

Abstract: Chemical systems are interpreted through the species they contain and the reactions they may undergo, i.e., their chemical reaction network (CRN). In spite of their central importance to chemistry, the structure of CRNs continues to be challenging to deduce from data. Although there exist structural laws relating species, reactions, conserved quantities and cycles, there has been limited attention to their measurable consequences. One such is the dimension of the chemical data: the number of independent reactions or equivalently independent species, which corresponds to the number of measured variables minus the number of constraints. In this paper we attempt to relate the experimentally observed dimensional features to conservation laws and underlying CRN structure. Our approach extends to any Markov model as well as many nonlinear models in statistical physics and furnishes new analytical tools to find exact solutions. In particular, we investigate the effects of species that are concealed and reactions that are irreversible. For instance, irreversible reactions can have proportional rates. The resulting reduction in degrees of freedom can be captured by the co-production law relating co-production relationships to emergent non-integer conservation laws and broken cycles. This law resolves a recent conundrum posed by a machine-discovered candidate for a non-integer conservation law, and characterizes certain types of CRN behavior. We also obtain laws that allow us to relate data dimension to network structure in cases where some species cannot be discerned or distinguished by a given analytical technique, allowing to narrow down candidate CRNs from experimental data more effectively.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (62)
  1. D. V. Kriukov, A. H. Koyuncu, and A. S. Y. Wong, Small 18, 2107523 (2022).
  2. Y. Zhang, S. Tsitkov, and H. Hess, Nat Catal 1, 276 (2018a).
  3. R. Aris, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 19, 81 (1965).
  4. M. Polettini and M. Esposito, The Journal of Chemical Physics 141, 024117 (2014).
  5. M. Feinberg, Foundations of Chemical Reaction Network Theory, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 202 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).
  6. S. Dal Cengio, V. Lecomte, and M. Polettini, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021040 (2023).
  7. F. Avanzini, N. Freitas, and M. Esposito, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021041 (2023a).
  8. J. Schnakenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 571 (1976).
  9. T. L. Hill, Free Energy Transduction and Biochemical Cycle Kinetics (Springer New York, New York, NY, 1989).
  10. J. C. Baez and B. S. Pollard, Rev. Math. Phys. 29, 1750028 (2017).
  11. J. P. Unsleber and M. Reiher, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71, 121 (2020).
  12. U. Bentrup, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 4718 (2010).
  13. D. G. Blackmond, Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 402 (2000).
  14. R. Pollice and M. Schnürch, Chem. Eur. J. 22, 5637 (2016).
  15. D. G. Blackmond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 10852 (2015).
  16. A. J. Kałka and A. M. Turek, J Fluoresc 31, 1599 (2021).
  17. M. Garrido, F. X. Rius, and M. S. Larrechi, Anal Bioanal Chem 390, 2059 (2008).
  18. S. D. Frans and J. M. Harris, Anal. Chem. 56, 466 (1984).
  19. C. Ruckebusch, B. Walczak, and L. Buydens, eds., Resolving spectral mixtures: with applications from ultrafast time-resolved spectroscopy to super-resolution imaging, first edition ed., Data handling in science and technology No. volume 30 (Elsevier, Amsterdam ; Boston, 2016) oCLC: ocn950449764.
  20. S. Bijlsma, H. F. M. Boelens, and A. K. Smilde, Appl Spectrosc 55, 77 (2001).
  21. A. D. Vogt and E. Di Cera, Biochemistry 51, 5894 (2012).
  22. S. Gianni, J. Dogan, and P. Jemth, Biophysical Chemistry 189, 33 (2014).
  23. T. Morton, D. Myszka, and I. Chaiken, Analytical Biochemistry 227, 176 (1995).
  24. X. Li and A. B. Kolomeisky, The Journal of Chemical Physics 139, 144106 (2013).
  25. D. G. Blackmond, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 4302 (2005).
  26. J. Burés, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2028 (2016a).
  27. J. Burés, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 16084 (2016b).
  28. R. Pollice, ChemRxiv 10.26434/chemrxiv.7885760.v1 (2019).
  29. R. Aris and R. H. S. Mah, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 2, 90 (1963).
  30. M. Feinberg, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 49, 187 (1972).
  31. F. Horn, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 49, 172 (1972).
  32. N. Vassena, Saddle-node bifurcations in chemical reaction networks (2022), arXiv:2209.14705 [math.DS] .
  33. D. Kondepudi and I. Prigogine, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, 1st ed. (Wiley, 2014).
  34. E. Penocchio, R. Rao, and M. Esposito, arXiv:2106.11665 [cond-mat]  (2021a), arXiv: 2106.11665.
  35. E. Penocchio, R. Rao, and M. Esposito, J. Chem. Phys. 155, 114101 (2021b).
  36. A. Blokhuis, D. Lacoste, and P. Gaspard, The Journal of Chemical Physics 148, 144902 (2018).
  37. J. M. Poulton, P. R. ten Wolde, and T. E. Ouldridge, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 1946 (2019).
  38. P. Gaspard and R. Kapral, The Journal of Chemical Physics 148, 134104 (2018).
  39. M. Polettini, A. Wachtel, and M. Esposito, The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, 184103 (2015), arXiv: 1507.00058.
  40. L. Oberreiter, U. Seifert, and A. C. Barato, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014106 (2022).
  41. F. Kaspar, ChemBioChem 24, e202200744 (2023).
  42. M. D. Cohen and E. Fischer, J. Chem. Soc. , 3044 (1962).
  43. G. Scheibe, Angew. Chem. 50, 212 (1937).
  44. V. A. Marčenko and L. A. Pastur, Math. USSR Sb. 1, 457 (1967).
  45. D. Venturi, J. Fluid Mech. 559, 215 (2006).
  46. B. P. Epps and E. M. Krivitzky, Exp Fluids 60, 121 (2019).
  47. B. P. Epps and A. H. Techet, Exp Fluids 48, 355 (2010).
  48. S. L. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, and J. N. Kutz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 3932 (2016).
  49. M. Schmidt and H. Lipson, Science 324, 81 (2009).
  50. Y.-i. Mototake, Phys. Rev. E 103, 033303 (2021).
  51. M. J. Willis and M. v. Stosch, Computers & Chemical Engineering 90, 31 (2016).
  52. J. Burés and I. Larrosa, Nature 613, 689 (2023).
  53. W. Ji and S. Deng, J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 1082 (2021).
  54. M. Polettini and M. Esposito, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240601 (2017).
  55. CQ3subscriptCQ3\text{CQ}_{3}CQ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT was taken from the Supp. Matt. of Ref[71] where it is derived. It differs from the expression for CQ3subscriptCQ3\text{CQ}_{3}CQ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT due to a small typo for the coefficient of [\ce⁢O⁢H∙\ce𝑂superscript𝐻∙\ce{OH}^{\bullet}italic_O italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∙ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT].
  56. G. Laurent, D. Lacoste, and P. Gaspard, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2012741118 (2021).
  57. J.-H. S. Hofmeyr, H. Kacser, and K. J. Merwe, Eur J Biochem 155, 631 (1986).
  58. F. Avanzini and M. Esposito, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 014116 (2022), arXiv:2110.11180 [cond-mat, physics:physics].
  59. A. Blokhuis, Physical aspects of origins of life scenarios, Theses, Université Paris sciences et lettres (2019).
  60. S. Schuster and T. Höfer, Faraday Trans. 87, 2561 (1991).
  61. S. Müller, C. Flamm, and P. F. Stader, J. Cheminform. 14, 63.
  62. N. Bazhin, ISRN Biochemistry 2012, 1 (2012).
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that irreversible reactions expand stoichiometric frameworks by introducing a co-production law linking reaction currents to emergent conservation laws.
  • It employs stoichiometric matrices and linear algebra to relate collinearity in reaction currents with the emergence of broken cycles.
  • The study addresses concealed species in experimental data, offering practical insights for improved network inference and experimental design.

An Analytical Perspective on Unraveling Reaction Networks

The paper in question explores the comprehensive analysis of chemical reaction networks (CRNs) and their relationship with data dimensionality, focusing specifically on emergent conserved quantities due to irreversible reactions and concealed species. Authored by a team of researchers including Alex Blokhuis and Robert Pollice, this study progresses the theoretical and practical understanding of CRNs, typically clouded by the inherent complexity and unknown constituents of chemical systems.

At its core, the paper builds on established stoichiometric approaches to extend the analytical framework used to study CRNs, bringing forth the concept of a co-production law. This law is a significant contribution because it mathematically relates the co-production index, a count of collinearity in reaction currents, to the number of emergent conservation laws and broken cycles. The conventional interpretation of conserved quantities based purely on stoichiometry is thus expanded, acknowledging the reality that additional conservation laws may emerge due to the irreversible nature of some reactions.

The authors employ concepts such as stoichiometric matrices and use the fundamental theorem of linear algebra to derive relationships that delineate the impact of irreversibility in reactions. They elucidate these ideas through illustrative examples, highlighting that irreversible reactions can either yield new conservation laws or lead to the loss of cycles within a reaction network. The discussion of an atmospheric chemistry model within their study vividly demonstrates these theoretical insights and validates them using a practical example discovered via machine-learning approaches by Liu et al. (2023).

The paper further tackles the complexity arising from incomplete observation of species in experimental settings, often due to limitations in detection techniques. The concealed species law and isospectral species law articulated by the authors account for species that are spectroscopically inactive or indistinguishable. These considerations are pivotal, allowing researchers to appreciate the constraints and limitations inherent in real-world chemical data and subsequently refine their interpretations and models.

By creating a unified framework and enhancing the understanding of these complex chemical systems, this research opens pathways for improved inference methodologies, potentially aiding in the design of experiments and development of algorithms that can automatically deduce reaction network structures from experimental data.

The implications of this work are manifold. Theoretically, it integrates deeper insights into the relationships between stoichiometry and system constraints, which could influence fields ranging from synthetic chemistry to systems biology. Practically, this improved understanding could optimize experimental approaches in chemical synthesis and catalysis, potentially accelerating the pace of discovery in these domains.

Looking forward, as CRNs become indispensable in the development of complex chemical systems and materials, understanding these relationships will be crucial. The concept of data dimensionality and its ties to network structure offers a lens through which the analytical chemistry community can devise more intuitive and automated methods for CRN elucidation, advancing both theoretical insights and practical applications in artificial intelligence and machine learning within chemical sciences.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 85 likes about this paper.