Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A research infrastructure for generating and sharing diversity-aware data

Published 16 Jun 2023 in cs.CY | (2306.09759v1)

Abstract: The intensive flow of personal data associated with the trend of computerizing aspects of people's diversity in their daily lives is associated with issues concerning not only people protection and their trust in new technologies, but also bias in the analysis of data and problems in their management and reuse. Faced with a complex problem, the strategies adopted, including technologies and services, often focus on individual aspects, which are difficult to integrate into a broader framework, which can be of effective support for researchers and developers. Therefore, we argue for the development of an end-to-end research infrastructure (RI) that enables trustworthy diversity-aware data within a citizen science community.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. Rob Kitchin. The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Sage, 2014.
  2. Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3):149–157, 2015.
  3. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013.
  4. David M Berry. The computational turn: Thinking about the digital humanities. Culture machine, 12, 2011.
  5. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, communication & society, 15(5):662–679, 2012.
  6. The SAGE handbook of online research methods. Sage, 2008.
  7. The theory, practice, and ethical challenges of designing a diversity-aware platform for social relations. In AIES’21. Association for Computing Machinery, 2021.
  8. Jahna Otterbacher. Crowdsourcing stereotypes: Linguistic bias in metadata generated via gwap. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1955–1964, 2015.
  9. Investigating user perception of gender bias in image search: the role of sexism. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval, pages 933–936, 2018.
  10. Mitigating bias in algorithmic systems—a fish-eye view. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(5):1–37, 2022.
  11. Asunción Esteve. The business of personal data: Google, facebook, and privacy issues in the eu and the usa. International Data Privacy Law, 7(1):36–47, 2017.
  12. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pages 77–91. PMLR, 2018.
  13. Explainable ai: A brief survey on history, research areas, approaches and challenges. In Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing: 8th CCF International Conference, NLPCC 2019, Dunhuang, China, October 9–14, 2019, Proceedings, Part II 8, pages 563–574. Springer, 2019.
  14. EUCommission. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy ai. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  15. EUCommission. Research and innovation. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/research-infrastructures_en, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  16. Managing and sharing research data: A guide to good practice. Sage, 2019.
  17. Big–thick blending: A method for mixing analytical insights from big and thick data sources. Big Data & Society, 5(1):2053951718765026, 2018.
  18. What is citizen science? the challenges of definition. The science of citizen science, 13, 2021.
  19. LivePeople. https://datascientiafoundation.github.io/LivePeople/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  20. Intelligent sensing for citizen science: challenges and future directions. Mobile Networks and Applications, 21:375–385, 2016.
  21. A mobile data collection platform for mental health research. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17:241–251, 2013.
  22. Skyler Place, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Channah Rubin, Cristina Gorrostieta, Caroline Mead, John Kane, Brian P Marx, Joshua Feast, Thilo Deckersbach, Alex “Sandy” Pentland, et al. Behavioral indicators on a mobile sensing platform predict clinically validated psychiatric symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(3):e75, 2017.
  23. ResearchStack. http://researchstack.org/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  24. Aware: mobile context instrumentation framework. Frontiers in ICT, 2:6, 2015.
  25. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, pages 35–54, 2014.
  26. CitizenScienceLogger. https://lab.citizenscience.ch/en/tools/cslogger, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  27. UkDataArchive. https://www.data-archive.ac.uk/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  28. GESIS. https://www.gesis.org/en/home, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  29. Open Science Framework (OSF). https://osf.io/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  30. ComputerOntario. https://www.computeontario.ca/what-is-dri, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  31. BioBank. https://www.biobank.it/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  32. Crowdsourcing: A taxonomy and systematic mapping study. Computer Science Review, 17:43–69, 2015.
  33. Participatory sensing: A citizen-powered approach to illuminating the patterns that shape our world. Foresight & Governance Project, White Paper, pages 1–15, 2009.
  34. Opportunities in mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(8):29–35, 2014.
  35. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and society, 17(2), 2012.
  36. Zooniverse. https://www.zooniverse.org/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  37. iNaturalist. https://www.inaturalist.org/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  38. CornellLab. https://www.birds.cornell.edu/home/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  39. SciStarter. https://scistarter.org/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  40. EU-citizen.science. https://eu-citizen.science/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  41. Improving time use measurement with personal big collection - the experience of the european big data hackathon 2019. Journal of Official Statistics, 2020.
  42. Multi-device activity logging. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, pages 299–302, 2014.
  43. Mobile social media and academic performance. In International conference on social informatics, pages 3–13. Springer, Cham, 2017.
  44. Human-like context sensing for robot surveillance. International Journal of Semantic Computing, 12(01):129–148, 2017.
  45. Personal context recognition via reliable human-machine collaboration. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pages 379–384. IEEE, 2018.
  46. F.A.I.R.Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  47. itelos-building reusable knowledge graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.09418, 2021.
  48. SmartUniversity. http://su.disi.unitn.it/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  49. WeNet. https://www.internetofus.eu/, 2023. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  50. Complex daily activities, country-level diversity, and smartphone sensing: A study in denmark, italy, mongolia, paraguay, and uk. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.