Circumventing superexponential runtimes for hard instances of quantum adiabatic optimization
Abstract: Classical optimization problems can be solved by adiabatically preparing the ground state of a quantum Hamiltonian that encodes the problem. The performance of this approach is determined by the smallest gap encountered during the evolution. Here, we consider the maximum independent set problem, which can be efficiently encoded in the Hamiltonian describing a Rydberg atom array. We present a general construction of instances of the problem for which the minimum gap decays superexponentially with system size, implying a superexponentially large time to solution via adiabatic evolution. The small gap arises from locally independent choices, which cause the system to initially evolve and localize into a configuration far from the solution in terms of Hamming distance. We investigate remedies to this problem. Specifically, we show that quantum quenches in these models can exhibit signatures of quantum many-body scars, which in turn, can circumvent the superexponential gaps. By quenching from a suboptimal configuration, states with a larger ground state overlap can be prepared, illustrating the utility of quantum quenches as an algorithmic tool.
- B. N. Clark, C. J. Colbourn, and D. S. Johnson, Unit disk graphs, Discrete Mathematics 86, 165 (1990).
- B. Verweij and K. Aardal, An Optimisation Algorithm for Maximum Independent Set with Applications in Map Labelling, in Algorithms - ESA’ 99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by J. Nešetřil (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999) pp. 426–437.
- M. H. S. Amin and V. Choi, First Order Quantum Phase Transition in Adiabatic Quantum Computation, Physical Review A 80, 062326 (2009).
- B. Altshuler, H. Krovi, and J. Roland, Anderson localization makes adiabatic quantum optimization fail, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 12446 (2010).
- M. Cain et al., Quantum speedup for combinatorial optimization with flat energy landscapes (2023), in preparation.
- M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papić, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nature Physics 17, 675 (2021).
- I. Lesanovsky and H. Katsura, Interacting Fibonacci anyons in a Rydberg gas, Physical Review A 86, 041601 (2012).
- A. Messiah, Quantum mechanics: Volume II (North-Holland Publishing Company Amsterdam, 1962).
- S. Jansen, M.-B. Ruskai, and R. Seiler, Bounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computation, Journal of Mathematical Physics 48, 102111 (2007).
- P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model, Physical Review B 69, 075106 (2004).
- U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011).
- M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations, SciPost Physics Codebases , 4 (2022).
- L. D. Landau, Zur Theorie der Energieübertragung II, Z. Sowjetunion 2, 46 (1932).
- The violation is weak because the eigenstates constitute a set of measure zero in the thermodynamic limit.
- A. Lukin et al., Exploring quench dynamics as a shortcut to adiabaticity in programmable atoms arrays (2022), in preparation.
- S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, Optimization by Simulated Annealing, Science 220, 671 (1983).
- S. A. Gershgorin, Über die Abgrenzung der Eigenwerte einer Matrix, Bulletin de l’Académie des sciences de l’URSS, Classe des sciences mathématiques et naturelles 29, 749 (1931).
- C. D. Meyer, Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra, Vol. 71 (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2000).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.