Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Online Coalition Formation under Random Arrival or Coalition Dissolution

Published 29 Jun 2023 in cs.GT and cs.DS | (2306.16965v2)

Abstract: Coalition formation explores how to partition a set of $n$ agents into disjoint coalitions according to their preferences. We consider a cardinal utility model with an additively separable aggregation of preferences and study the online variant of coalition formation, where the agents arrive in sequence. The goal is to achieve competitive social welfare. In the basic model, agents arrive in an arbitrary order and have to be assigned to coalitions immediately and irrevocably. There, the natural greedy algorithm is known to achieve an optimal competitive ratio, which heavily relies on the range of utilities. We complement this result by considering two related models. First, we study a model where agents arrive in a random order. We find that the competitive ratio of the greedy algorithm is $\Theta\left(\frac{1}{n2}\right)$. In contrast, an alternative algorithm, which is based on alternating between waiting and greedy phases, can achieve a competitive ratio of $\Theta\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$. Second, we relax the irrevocability of decisions by allowing the dissolution of coalitions into singleton coalitions. We achieve an asymptotically optimal competitive ratio of $\Theta\left(\frac 1n\right)$ by drawing a close connection to a general model of online matching. Hence, in both models, we obtain a competitive ratio that removes the unavoidable utility dependencies in the basic model and essentially matches the best possible approximation ratio by polynomial-time algorithms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. Fractional hedonic games. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 7(2):1–29, 2019.
  2. Computing desirable partitions in additively separable hedonic games. Artificial Intelligence, 195:316–334, 2013.
  3. Core in a simple coalition formation game. Social Choice and Welfare, 18:135–153, 2001.
  4. Nash stable outcomes in fractional hedonic games: Existence, efficiency and computation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62:315–371, 2018.
  5. Hedonic games with fixed-size coalitions. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 9287–9295, 2022.
  6. Causes of stability in dynamic coalition formation. In Proceedings of the 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 5499–5506, 2023.
  7. The stability of hedonic coalition structures. Games and Economic Behavior, 38(2):201–230, 2002.
  8. Finding and recognizing popular coalition structures. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 74:569–626, 2022.
  9. Single-agent dynamics in additively separable hedonic games. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 4867–4874, 2022.
Citations (6)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.