Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Reliable confidence regions for quantum tomography using distribution moments

Published 24 Jul 2023 in quant-ph | (2307.12823v2)

Abstract: Quantum tomography is a widely applicable method for reconstructing unknown quantum states and processes. However, its applications in quantum technologies usually also require estimating the difference between prepared and target quantum states with reliable confidence intervals. In this work we suggest a computationally efficient and reliable scheme for determining well-justified error bars for quantum tomography. We approximate the probability distribution of the Hilbert-Schmidt distance between the target state and the estimation, which is given by the linear inversion, by calculating its two moments. We also present a generalization of this approach for quantum process tomography and deriving confidence intervals for affine functions. We benchmark our approach for a number of quantum tomography protocols using both simulation and demonstration with the use of a cloud-accessible quantum processor. The obtained results pave the way for the use of the suggested scheme for the complete characterization of quantum systems of various natures.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. A. K. Fedorov, N. Gisin, S. M. Beloussov,  and A. I. Lvovsky, “Quantum computing at the quantum advantage threshold: a down-to-business review,”  (2022), arXiv:2203.17181 [quant-ph] .
  2. A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299 (2009).
  3. Y. I. Bogdanov, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 108, 928 (2009).
  4. S. T. Flammia and Y.-K. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230501 (2011).
  5. R. Blume-Kohout, “Robust error bars for quantum tomography,”  (2012), arXiv:1202.5270 [quant-ph] .
  6. M. Christandl and R. Renner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 120403 (2012).
  7. P. Faist and R. Renner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 010404 (2016).
  8. I. L. Chuang and M. A. Nielsen, Journal of Modern Optics 44, 2455 (1997).
  9. G. M. D’Ariano and P. Lo Presti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4195 (2001).
  10. G. S. Watson, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 1679 (1967).
  11. T. H. Kjeldsen, Historia Mathematica 20, 19 (1993).
  12. G. D. Lin, Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications 4, 5 (2017).
  13. F. Ouimet, Stats 4, 18 (2021).
  14. D. A. Bodenham and N. M. Adams, Statistics and Computing 26, 917 (2016).
  15. A. Jamiołkowski, Reports on Mathematical Physics 3, 275 (1972).
  16. M.-D. Choi, Linear Algebra and its Applications 10, 285 (1975).
  17. K. Zyczkowski and H.-J. Sommers, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 34, 7111 (2001).
  18. “Ibm q 5 yorktown v1.x.x version log,” https://github.com/adcorcol/ibmqx-backend-information/blob/master/backends/yorktown/V1/README.md.
  19. A. Anis and A. I. Lvovsky, New Journal of Physics 14, 105021 (2012).
  20. M. Ghalaii and A. T. Rezakhani, Phys. Rev. A 95, 032336 (2017).
  21. E. O. Kiktenko, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032419 (2023).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.