Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Universality of Three Identical Bosons with Large, Negative Effective Range

Published 2 Aug 2023 in nucl-th, cond-mat.quant-gas, physics.atm-clus, physics.atom-ph, and quant-ph | (2308.01394v2)

Abstract: "Resummed-Range Effective Field Theory'' is a consistent nonrelativistic effective field theory of contact interactions with large scattering length $a$ and an effective range $r_0$ large in magnitude but negative. Its leading order is non-perturbative. Its observables are universal, i.e.~they depend only on the dimensionless ratio $\xi:=2r_0/a$, with the overall distance scale set by $|r_0|$. In the two-body sector, the position of the two shallow $S$-wave poles in the complex plane is determined by $\xi$. We investigate three identical bosons at leading order for a two-body system with one bound and one virtual state ($\xi\le0$), or with two virtual states ($0\le\xi<1$). Such conditions might, for example, be found in systems of heavy mesons. We find that no three-body interaction is needed to renormalise (and stabilise) Resummed-Range EFT at LO. A well-defined ground state exists for $0.366\ldots\ge\xi\ge-8.72\ldots$. Three-body excitations appear for even smaller ranges of $\xi$ around the quasi-unitarity point'' $\xi=0$ ($|r_0|\ll|a|\to\infty$) and obey discrete scaling relations. We explore in detail the ground state and the lowest three excitations and parametrise their trajectories as function of $\xi$ and of the binding momentum $\kappa_2^-$ of the shallowest \twoB state from where three-body and two-body binding energies are identical to zero three-body binding. As $|r_0|\ll|a|$ becomes perturbative, this version turns into theShort-Range EFT'' which needs a stabilising three-body interaction and exhibits Efimov's Discrete Scale Invariance. By interpreting that EFT as a low-energy version of Resummed-Range EFT, we match spectra to determine Efimov's scale-breaking parameter $\Lambda_*$ in a renormalisation scheme with a ``hard'' cutoff. Finally, we compare phase shifts for scattering a boson on the two-boson bound state with that of the equivalent Efimov system.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. V. Efimov, Phys. Lett. B 33 (1970) 563 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(70)90349-7.
  2. V. N. Efimov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 12 (1971) 589.
  3. V. Efimov, Nucl. Phys. A 210 (1973) 157 doi:10.1016/0375-9474(73)90510-1.
  4. V. Efimov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 29 (1979) 546.
  5. S. König, Eur. Phys. J. A 56 (2020) 113 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00098-9 [arXiv:1910.12627 [nucl-th]].
  6. E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Phys. Rept. 428 (2006) 259 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.001 [cond-mat/0410417].
  7. P. Naidon and S. Endo, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 (2017) 056001 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa50e8 [arXiv:1610.09805 [quant-ph]].
  8. J. Haidenbauer and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022) 137074 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137074 [arXiv:2109.11794 [nucl-th]].
  9. L. H. Thomas, Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 903 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.903.
  10. U. van Kolck, Symmetry 14 (2022) 1884 doi:10.3390/sym14091884 [arXiv:2209.08432 [hep-ph]].
  11. E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 98 (1955) 145 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.98.145.
  12. C. J. Fewster, J. Phys. A 28 (1995) 110 doi:10.1088/0305-4470/28/4/031 [hep-th/9412050].
  13. D. R. Phillips and T. D. Cohen, Phys. Lett. B 390 (1997) 7 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01411-6 [nucl-th/9607048].
  14. D. B. Kaplan, Nucl. Phys. B 494 (1997) 471 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00178-8 [nucl-th/9610052 [nucl-th]].
  15. B. A. Gelman, Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 034005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.034005 [arXiv:0906.5502 [nucl-th]].
  16. M. H. Alhakami, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 056019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.056019 [arXiv:1706.05622 [nucl-th]].
  17. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) B672 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.137.B672.
  18. L. D. Faddeev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 39 (1960) 1459.
  19. L. Eyges, Phys. Rev. 121 (1961) 1744 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.121.1744.
  20. A. Deltuva, Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010) 040701 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.040701 [arXiv:1009.1295 [physics.atm-clus]].
  21. M. Gattobigio and A. Kievsky, Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 012502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.012502 [arXiv:1309.1927 [cond-mat.quant-gas]].
  22. N. Hu, Phys. Rev. 74 (1948) 131 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.74.131.
  23. W. Schützer and J. Tiomno, Phys. Rev. 83 (1951) 249 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.83.249.
  24. S. T. Ma, Phys. Rev. 69 (1946) 668 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.69.668.
  25. D. ter Haar, Physica 12 (1946) 501 doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(46)80073-9.
  26. S. T. Ma, Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 195 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.71.195.
  27. S. R. Beane and M. J. Savage, Nucl. Phys. A 694 (2001) 511 doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01088-0 [nucl-th/0011067].
  28. F. Gabbiani, [nucl-th/0104088].
  29. S. R. Beane and R. C. Farrell, Few Body Syst. 63 (2022) 45 doi:10.1007/s00601-022-01748-y [arXiv:2112.05800 [nucl-th]].
  30. D. S. Petrov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 143201 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.143201 [cond-mat/0404036 [cond-mat.stat-mech]].
  31. H. W. Grießhammer, Nucl. Phys. A 760 (2005) 110 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.05.202 [nucl-th/0502039].
  32. H. W. Grießhammer and U. van Kolck, in preparation.
  33. A. Deltuva, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 034003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034003 [arXiv:2101.12654 [cond-mat.quant-gas]].
  34. A. Deltuva, Phys. Rev. A 85 (2012) 012708 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.012708 [arXiv:1201.2326 [physics.atom-ph]].
  35. C. Ji and D. R. Phillips, Few-Body Syst. 54 (2013) 2317 doi:10.1007/s00601-013-0710-5 [arXiv:1212.1845 [nucl-th]].
  36. U. van Kolck, Few Body Syst. 58 (2017) 112 doi:10.1007/s00601-017-1271-9.
  37. J. H. Hetherington and L. H. Schick, Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) B935 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.137.B935.
  38. R. Aaron and R. D. Amado, Phys. Rev. 150 (1966) 857 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.150.857.
  39. R. T. Cahill and I. H. Sloan, Nucl. Phys. A 165 (1971) 161 [erratum: Nucl. Phys. A 196 (1972) 632] doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90798-1.
  40. D. D. Brayshaw, Phys. Rev. 176 (1968) 1855 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.176.1855.
  41. P. F. Bedaque and H. W. Grießhammer, Nucl. Phys. A 671 (2000) 357 doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00691-0 [nucl-th/9907077].
  42. H. W. Grießhammer, Nucl. Phys. A 744 (2004) 192 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.08.012 [nucl-th/0404073].
  43. L. Gauthier and A. N. Kamal, Annals Phys. 88 (1974) 193 doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90402-3.
  44. H.-W. Hammer and L. Platter, Eur. Phys. J. A 32 (2007) 113 doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-10301-8 [nucl-th/0610105].
  45. J. von Stecher, J. Phys. B 43 (2010) 101002 doi:10.1088/0953-4075/43/10/101002.
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.