Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Process Learning Through Neural Emulation

Published 17 Aug 2023 in quant-ph | (2308.08815v2)

Abstract: Neural networks are a promising tool for characterizing intermediate-scale quantum devices from limited amounts of measurement data. A challenging problem in this area is to learn the action of an unknown quantum process on an ensemble of physically relevant input states. To tackle this problem, we introduce a neural network that emulates the unknown process by constructing an internal representation of the input ensemble and by mimicking the action of the process at the state representation level. After being trained with measurement data from a few pairs of input/output quantum states, the network becomes able to predict the measurement statistics for all inputs in the ensemble of interest. We show that our model exhibits high accuracy in applications to quantum computing, quantum photonics, and quantum many-body physics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Isaac L Chuang and Michael A Nielsen, “Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box,” J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2455–2467 (1997).
  2. G. M. D’Ariano and P. Lo Presti, “Quantum tomography for measuring experimentally the matrix elements of an arbitrary quantum operation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4195–4198 (2001).
  3. J. B. Altepeter, D. Branning, E. Jeffrey, T. C. Wei, P. G. Kwiat, R. T. Thew, J. L. O’Brien, M. A. Nielsen,  and A. G. White, “Ancilla-assisted quantum process tomography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 193601 (2003).
  4. Mirko Lobino, Dmitry Korystov, Connor Kupchak, Eden Figueroa, Barry C Sanders,  and AI Lvovsky, “Complete characterization of quantum-optical processes,” Science 322, 563–566 (2008).
  5. Saleh Rahimi-Keshari, Artur Scherer, Ady Mann, Ali T Rezakhani, AI Lvovsky,  and Barry C Sanders, “Quantum process tomography with coherent states,” New J. Phys. 13, 013006 (2011).
  6. Scott Aaronson, “Shadow tomography of quantum states,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (2018) pp. 325–338.
  7. Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng,  and John Preskill, “Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements,” Nat. Phys. 16, 1050–1057 (2020).
  8. Hsin-Yuan Huang, Sitan Chen,  and John Preskill, “Learning to predict arbitrary quantum processes,” arXiv:2210.14894  (2022a).
  9. E. Flurin, L. S. Martin, S. Hacohen-Gourgy,  and I. Siddiqi, “Using a recurrent neural network to reconstruct quantum dynamics of a superconducting qubit from physical observations,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 011006 (2020).
  10. Naeimeh Mohseni, Thomas Fösel, Lingzhen Guo, Carlos Navarrete-Benlloch,  and Florian Marquardt, “Deep learning of quantum many-body dynamics via random driving,” Quantum 6, 714 (2022).
  11. G. Koolstra, N. Stevenson, S. Barzili, L. Burns, K. Siva, S. Greenfield, W. Livingston, A. Hashim, R. K. Naik, J. M. Kreikebaum, K. P. O’Brien, D. I. Santiago, J. Dressel,  and I. Siddiqi, “Monitoring fast superconducting qubit dynamics using a neural network,” Phys. Rev. X 12, 031017 (2022).
  12. Yulei Huang, Liangyu Che, Chao Wei, Feng Xu, Xinfang Nie, Jun Li, Dawei Lu,  and Tao Xin, “Measuring quantum entanglement from local information by machine learning,” arXiv:2209.08501  (2022b).
  13. Naeimeh Mohseni, Junheng Shi, Tim Byrnes,  and Michael Hartmann, “Deep learning of many-body observables and quantum information scrambling,” arXiv:2302.04621  (2023).
  14. Giacomo Torlai, Guglielmo Mazzola, Juan Carrasquilla, Matthias Troyer, Roger Melko,  and Giuseppe Carleo, “Neural-network quantum state tomography,” Nat. Phys. 14, 447–450 (2018).
  15. Juan Carrasquilla, Giacomo Torlai, Roger G Melko,  and Leandro Aolita, “Reconstructing quantum states with generative models,” Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 155–161 (2019).
  16. Shahnawaz Ahmed, Carlos Sánchez Muñoz, Franco Nori,  and Anton Frisk Kockum, “Quantum state tomography with conditional generative adversarial networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140502 (2021).
  17. Yan Zhu, Ya-Dong Wu, Ge Bai, Dong-Sheng Wang, Yuexuan Wang,  and Giulio Chiribella, “Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networks,” Nat. Commun. 13, 6222 (2022).
  18. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine,  and Timo Aila, “A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (2019) pp. 4401–4410.
  19. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Jaakko Lehtinen,  and Timo Aila, “Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (2020) pp. 8110–8119.
  20. Martin Krzywinski and Naomi Altman, “Visualizing samples with box plots.” Nature methods 11, 119–120 (2014).
  21. BP Lanyon, C Maier, Milan Holzäpfel, Tillmann Baumgratz, C Hempel, P Jurcevic, Ish Dhand, AS Buyskikh, AJ Daley, Marcus Cramer, et al., “Efficient tomography of a quantum many-body system,” Nat. Phys. 13, 1158–1162 (2017).
  22. Jerry L Hintze and Ray D Nelson, “Violin plots: a box plot-density trace synergism,” The American Statistician 52, 181–184 (1998).
  23. Mark Dykman, Fluctuating nonlinear oscillators: from nanomechanics to quantum superconducting circuits (Oxford University Press, 2012).
  24. Kristan Temme, Sergey Bravyi,  and Jay M. Gambetta, “Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017).
  25. Suguru Endo, Simon C. Benjamin,  and Ying Li, “Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 031027 (2018).
  26. Gerardo Adesso and Giulio Chiribella, “Quantum benchmark for teleportation and storage of squeezed states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 170503 (2008).
  27. Giulio Chiribella and Jinyu Xie, “Optimal design and quantum benchmarks for coherent state amplifiers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213602 (2013).
  28. Scott Aaronson, “The learnability of quantum states,” Proc. R. Soc. A 463, 3089–3114 (2007).
  29. Matthias C Caro, ‘‘Learning quantum processes and hamiltonians via the pauli transfer matrix,” arXiv:2212.04471  (2022).
  30. Iman Marvian and Seth Lloyd, “Universal quantum emulator,” arXiv:1606.02734  (2016).
  31. Alessandro Bisio, Giulio Chiribella, Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Stefano Facchini,  and Paolo Perinotti, “Optimal quantum learning of a unitary transformation,” Phys. Rev. A 81, 032324 (2010).
  32. Matthias C Caro, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Nicholas Ezzell, Joe Gibbs, Andrew T Sornborger, Lukasz Cincio, Patrick J Coles,  and Zoë Holmes, “Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamics,” Nat. Commun. 14, 3751 (2023).
  33. Sofiene Jerbi, Joe Gibbs, Manuel S Rudolph, Matthias C Caro, Patrick J Coles, Hsin-Yuan Huang,  and Zoë Holmes, “The power and limitations of learning quantum dynamics incoherently,” arXiv:2303.12834  (2023).
  34. Élie Genois, Jonathan A. Gross, Agustin Di Paolo, Noah J. Stevenson, Gerwin Koolstra, Akel Hashim, Irfan Siddiqi,  and Alexandre Blais, “Quantum-tailored machine-learning characterization of a superconducting qubit,” PRX Quantum 2, 040355 (2021).
  35. Raban Iten, Tony Metger, Henrik Wilming, Lídia del Rio,  and Renato Renner, “Discovering physical concepts with neural networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010508 (2020).
  36. Raban Iten, Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Discoveries: Extracting Physical Concepts from Experimental Data Using Deep Learning (Springer Nature, 2023).
  37. Charu C Aggarwal et al., “Neural networks and deep learning,” Springer 10, 3 (2018).
  38. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,” Neural computation 9, 1735–1780 (1997).
  39. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980  (2014).
  40. Cirq Developers, “Cirq,”  (2022), See full list of authors on Github: https://github .com/quantumlib/Cirq/graphs/contributors.
  41. Masuo Suzuki, “Generalized trotter’s formula and systematic approximants of exponential operators and inner derivations with applications to many-body problems,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 51, 183–190 (1976).
  42. Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al., “Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library,” Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up