Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Phenomenological profile of scotogenic fermionic dark matter

Published 17 Aug 2023 in hep-ph | (2308.09135v2)

Abstract: We consider the possibility that neutrino masses arise from the exchange of dark matter states. We examine in detail the phenomenology of fermionic dark matter in the singlet-triplet scotogenic reference model. We explore the case of singlet-like fermionic dark matter, taking into account all co-annihilation effects relevant for determining its relic abundance, such as fermion-fermion and scalar-fermion co-annihilation. Although this in principle allows for dark matter below 60 GeV, the latter is in conflict with charged lepton flavour violation (cLFV) and/or collider physics constraints. We examine the prospects for direct dark matter detection in upcoming experiments up to 10 TeV. Fermion-scalar coannihilation is needed to obtain viable fermionic dark matter in the 60-100 GeV mass range. Fermion-fermion and fermion-scalar coannihilation play complementary roles in different parameter regions above 100 GeV.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (91)
  1. P. F. de Salas et al., “2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,” JHEP 02 (2021) 071, arXiv:2006.11237 [hep-ph].
  2. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, “Supersymmetric dark matter,” Phys.Rept. 267 (1996) 195–373, arXiv:hep-ph/9506380 [hep-ph].
  3. G. Bertone and D. Hooper, “History of dark matter,” Rev.Mod.Phys. 90 no. 4, (2018) 045002, arXiv:1605.04909 [astro-ph.CO].
  4. G. Arcadi et al., “The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,” Eur.Phys.J.C 78 no. 3, (2018) 203, arXiv:1703.07364 [hep-ph].
  5. E. Ma, “Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301, arXiv:hep-ph/0601225.
  6. Z.-j. Tao, “Radiative seesaw mechanism at weak scale,” Phys.Rev.D 54 (1996) 5693–5697, arXiv:hep-ph/9603309 [hep-ph].
  7. M. Hirsch, R. A. Lineros, S. Morisi, J. Palacio, N. Rojas, and J. W. F. Valle, “WIMP dark matter as radiative neutrino mass messenger,” JHEP 10 (2013) 149, arXiv:1307.8134 [hep-ph].
  8. A. Merle, M. Platscher, N. Rojas, J. W. F. Valle, and A. Vicente, “Consistency of WIMP Dark Matter as radiative neutrino mass messenger,” JHEP 07 (2016) 013, arXiv:1603.05685 [hep-ph].
  9. P. Rocha-Moran and A. Vicente, “Lepton Flavor Violation in the singlet-triplet scotogenic model,” JHEP 07 (2016) 078, arXiv:1605.01915 [hep-ph].
  10. D. Restrepo and A. Rivera, “Phenomenological consistency of the singlet-triplet scotogenic model,” JHEP 04 (2020) 134, arXiv:1907.11938 [hep-ph].
  11. S. Choubey, S. Khan, M. Mitra, and S. Mondal, “Singlet-Triplet Fermionic Dark Matter and LHC Phenomenology,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 4, (2018) 302, arXiv:1711.08888 [hep-ph].
  12. M. A. Díaz, N. Rojas, S. Urrutia-Quiroga, and J. W. F. Valle, “Heavy Higgs Boson Production at Colliders in the Singlet-Triplet Scotogenic Dark Matter Model,” JHEP 08 (2017) 017, arXiv:1612.06569 [hep-ph].
  13. I. M. Ávila, V. De Romeri, L. Duarte, and J. W. F. Valle, “Phenomenology of scotogenic scalar dark matter,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 no. 10, (2020) 908, arXiv:1910.08422 [hep-ph].
  14. G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135–157.
  15. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227.
  16. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number,” Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 774.
  17. A. Ibarra and G. G. Ross, “Neutrino phenomenology: The Case of two right-handed neutrinos,” Phys. Lett. B 591 (2004) 285–296, arXiv:hep-ph/0312138.
  18. J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, “Oscillating neutrinos and μ→e,γ→𝜇𝑒𝛾\mu\to e,\gammaitalic_μ → italic_e , italic_γ,” Nucl. Phys. B 618 (2001) 171–204, arXiv:hep-ph/0103065.
  19. K. Kannike, “Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria,” Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2093, arXiv:1205.3781 [hep-ph].
  20. L. Allwicher, P. Arnan, D. Barducci, and M. Nardecchia, “Perturbative unitarity constraints on generic Yukawa interactions,” JHEP 10 (2021) 129, arXiv:2108.00013 [hep-ph].
  21. H. Bahl, M. Carena, N. M. Coyle, A. Ireland, and C. E. M. Wagner, “New tools for dissecting the general 2HDM,” JHEP 03 (2023) 165, arXiv:2210.00024 [hep-ph].
  22. P. Bandyopadhyay, S. Jangid, and A. Karan, “Constraining scalar doublet and triplet leptoquarks with vacuum stability and perturbativity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no. 6, (2022) 516, arXiv:2111.03872 [hep-ph].
  23. J. L. Diaz-Cruz and D. A. Lopez-Falcon, “Probing the mechanism of EWSB with a rho parameter defined in terms of Higgs couplings,” Phys. Lett. B 568 (2003) 245–253, arXiv:hep-ph/0304212.
  24. CDF Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., “High-precision measurement of the W𝑊Witalic_W boson mass with the CDF II detector,” Science 376 no. 6589, (2022) 170–176.
  25. A. Batra, P. Bharadwaj, S. Mandal, R. Srivastava, and J. W. Valle, “W-mass anomaly in the simplest linear seesaw mechanism,” Phys.Lett.B 834 (2022) 137408, arXiv:2208.04983 [hep-ph].
  26. S. Kanemura and K. Yagyu, “Implication of the W boson mass anomaly at CDF II in the Higgs triplet model with a mass difference,” Phys. Lett. B 831 (2022) 137217, arXiv:2204.07511 [hep-ph].
  27. T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, and G. Weiglein, “Excesses in the low-mass Higgs-boson search and the W𝑊Witalic_W-boson mass measurement,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 5, (2023) 450, arXiv:2204.05975 [hep-ph].
  28. D. Van Loi and P. Van Dong, “Novel effects of the W-boson mass shift in the 3-3-1 model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 1, (2023) 56, arXiv:2206.10100 [hep-ph].
  29. A. Batra, S. K. A, S. Mandal, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “CDF-II W𝑊Witalic_W Boson Mass Anomaly in the Canonical Scotogenic Neutrino-Dark Matter Model,” arXiv:2204.11945 [hep-ph].
  30. A. Batra, S. K. A., S. Mandal, and R. Srivastava, “W boson mass in Singlet-Triplet Scotogenic dark matter model,” arXiv:2204.09376 [hep-ph].
  31. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou, “The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,” JHEP 09 (2020) 178, arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph].
  32. F. Capozzi, E. Di Valentino, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo, “Unfinished fabric of the three neutrino paradigm,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 083031, arXiv:2107.00532 [hep-ph].
  33. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., “Search for Charged Higgs bosons: Combined Results Using LEP Data,” Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2463, arXiv:1301.6065 [hep-ex].
  34. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via H±→τ±⁢ν→superscript𝐻plus-or-minussuperscript𝜏plus-or-minus𝜈H^{\pm}\rightarrow\tau^{\pm}\nuitalic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν in fully hadronic final states using p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collision data at s=8𝑠8\sqrt{s}=8square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP 03 (2015) 088, arXiv:1412.6663 [hep-ex].
  35. CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., “Search for a charged Higgs boson in pp collisions at s=8𝑠8\sqrt{s}=8square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV,” JHEP 11 (2015) 018, arXiv:1508.07774 [hep-ex].
  36. OPAL Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., “Search for chargino and neutralino production at s**(1/2) = 192-GeV to 209 GeV at LEP,” Eur. Phys. J. C 35 (2004) 1–20, arXiv:hep-ex/0401026.
  37. OPAL Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., “Search for anomalous production of dilepton events with missing transverse momentum in e+ e- collisions at s**(1/2) = 183-Gev to 209-GeV,” Eur. Phys. J. C 32 (2004) 453–473, arXiv:hep-ex/0309014.
  38. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions using the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 no. 2, (2020) 123, arXiv:1908.08215 [hep-ex].
  39. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for direct pair production of sleptons and charginos decaying to two leptons and neutralinos with mass splittings near the W-boson mass in s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP 06 (2023) 031, arXiv:2209.13935 [hep-ex].
  40. A. Pierce and J. Thaler, “Natural Dark Matter from an Unnatural Higgs Boson and New Colored Particles at the TeV Scale,” JHEP 08 (2007) 026, arXiv:hep-ph/0703056.
  41. L3 Collaboration, P. Achard et al., “Search for a Higgs boson decaying to weak boson pairs at LEP,” Phys. Lett. B 568 (2003) 191–204, arXiv:hep-ex/0307010.
  42. CDF, D0 Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., “Higgs Boson Studies at the Tevatron,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 5, (2013) 052014, arXiv:1303.6346 [hep-ex].
  43. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for a fermiophobic Higgs boson in the diphoton decay channel with the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2157, arXiv:1205.0701 [hep-ex].
  44. CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Searches for Higgs Bosons in pp Collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 and 8 TeV in the Context of Four-Generation and Fermiophobic Models,” Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 36–59, arXiv:1302.1764 [hep-ex].
  45. ALEPH Collaboration, A. Heister et al., “Final results of the searches for neutral Higgs bosons in e+⁢e−superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collisions at s**(1/2) up to 209-GeV,” Phys. Lett. B 526 (2002) 191–205, arXiv:hep-ex/0201014.
  46. E. Lundstrom, M. Gustafsson, and J. Edsjo, “The Inert Doublet Model and LEP II Limits,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 035013, arXiv:0810.3924 [hep-ph].
  47. OPAL Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., “Search for stable and longlived massive charged particles in e+⁢e−superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collisions at s**(1/2) = 130-GeV to 209-GeV,” Phys. Lett. B 572 (2003) 8–20, arXiv:hep-ex/0305031.
  48. L3 Collaboration, P. Achard et al., “Search for heavy neutral and charged leptons in e+⁢e−superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT annihilation at LEP,” Phys. Lett. B 517 (2001) 75–85, arXiv:hep-ex/0107015.
  49. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for type-III seesaw heavy leptons in dilepton final states in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 3, (2021) 218, arXiv:2008.07949 [hep-ex].
  50. ATLAS Collaboration, “A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery,” Nature 607 no. 7917, (2022) 52–59, arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: Nature 612, E24 (2022)].
  51. F. Staub, “SARAH,” arXiv:0806.0538 [hep-ph].
  52. F. Staub, “SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773–1790, arXiv:1309.7223 [hep-ph].
  53. F. Staub, “Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015 (2015) 840780, arXiv:1503.04200 [hep-ph].
  54. W. Porod, “SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+⁢e−superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT colliders,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 153 (2003) 275–315, arXiv:hep-ph/0301101.
  55. W. Porod and F. Staub, “SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458–2469, arXiv:1104.1573 [hep-ph].
  56. W. Porod, F. Staub, and A. Vicente, “A Flavor Kit for BSM models,” Eur. Phys. J. C 74 no. 8, (2014) 2992, arXiv:1405.1434 [hep-ph].
  57. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 149 (2002) 103–120, arXiv:hep-ph/0112278.
  58. G. Belanger, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, “Recasting direct detection limits within micrOMEGAs and implication for non-standard Dark Matter scenarios,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 3, (2021) 239, arXiv:2003.08621 [hep-ph].
  59. MEG Collaboration, A. M. Baldini et al., “Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+→e+⁢γ→superscript𝜇superscripte𝛾\mu^{+}\rightarrow\mathrm{e}^{+}\gammaitalic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → roman_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76 no. 8, (2016) 434, arXiv:1605.05081 [hep-ex].
  60. MEG II Collaboration, A. M. Baldini et al., “The design of the MEG II experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 5, (2018) 380, arXiv:1801.04688 [physics.ins-det].
  61. SINDRUM Collaboration, U. Bellgardt et al., “Search for the Decay μ+→e+⁢e+⁢e−→superscript𝜇superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝑒\mu^{+}\to e^{+}e^{+}e^{-}italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,” Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988) 1–6.
  62. A. Blondel et al., “Research Proposal for an Experiment to Search for the Decay μ→e⁢e⁢e→𝜇𝑒𝑒𝑒\mu\to eeeitalic_μ → italic_e italic_e italic_e,” arXiv:1301.6113 [physics.ins-det].
  63. Mu3e Collaboration, K. Arndt et al., “Technical design of the phase I Mu3e experiment,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1014 (2021) 165679, arXiv:2009.11690 [physics.ins-det].
  64. SINDRUM II Collaboration, W. H. Bertl et al., “A Search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold,” Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 337–346.
  65. PRISM/PRIME Collaboration, S. Machida et al., “Search for the μ→e→𝜇𝑒\mu\to eitalic_μ → italic_e conversion process at an ultimate sensitivity of the order of 10−18superscript101810^{-18}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with PRISM,” LOI to J-PARC 50-GeV PS, LOI-25 .
  66. Mu2e Collaboration, L. Bartoszek et al., “Mu2e Technical Design Report,” arXiv:1501.05241 [physics.ins-det].
  67. COMET Collaboration, R. Abramishvili et al., “COMET Phase-I Technical Design Report,” PTEP 2020 no. 3, (2020) 033C01, arXiv:1812.09018 [physics.ins-det].
  68. SINDRUM II Collaboration, C. Dohmen et al., “Test of lepton flavor conservation in μ→e→𝜇𝑒\mu\to eitalic_μ → italic_e conversion on titanium,” Phys. Lett. B 317 (1993) 631–636.
  69. S. Banerjee et al., “Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Charged lepton flavor violation in the tau sector,” arXiv:2203.14919 [hep-ph].
  70. BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., “Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation in the Decays τ±→e±⁢γ→superscript𝜏plus-or-minussuperscript𝑒plus-or-minus𝛾\tau^{\pm}\to e^{\pm}\gammaitalic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ and τ±→μ±⁢γ→superscript𝜏plus-or-minussuperscript𝜇plus-or-minus𝛾\tau^{\pm}\to\mu^{\pm}\gammaitalic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 021802, arXiv:0908.2381 [hep-ex].
  71. Belle-II Collaboration, L. Aggarwal et al., “Snowmass White Paper: Belle II physics reach and plans for the next decade and beyond,” arXiv:2207.06307 [hep-ex].
  72. Belle Collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., “Search for lepton-flavor-violating tau-lepton decays to ℓ⁢γℓ𝛾\ell\gammaroman_ℓ italic_γ at Belle,” JHEP 10 (2021) 19, arXiv:2103.12994 [hep-ex].
  73. K. Hayasaka et al., “Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced τ+⁢τ−superscript𝜏superscript𝜏\tau^{+}\tau^{-}italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Pairs,” Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 139–143, arXiv:1001.3221 [hep-ex].
  74. Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)].
  75. DarkSide-50 Collaboration, P. Agnes et al., “Search for low mass dark matter in DarkSide-50: the bayesian network approach,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 322, arXiv:2302.01830 [hep-ex].
  76. XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “Search for Coherent Elastic Scattering of Solar 88{}^{8}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 8 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTB Neutrinos in the XENON1T Dark Matter Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 091301, arXiv:2012.02846 [hep-ex].
  77. PandaX Collaboration, W. Ma et al., “Search for Solar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Coherent Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 2, (2023) 021802, arXiv:2207.04883 [hep-ex].
  78. XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 11, (2018) 111302, arXiv:1805.12562 [astro-ph.CO].
  79. (XENON Collaboration)††, XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 4, (2023) 041003, arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex].
  80. PandaX-4T Collaboration, Y. Meng et al., “Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 26, (2021) 261802, arXiv:2107.13438 [hep-ex].
  81. LUX-ZEPLIN Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al., “First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 4, (2023) 041002, arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex].
  82. J. Billard et al., “Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 no. 5, (2022) 056201, arXiv:2104.07634 [hep-ex].
  83. C. A. J. O’Hare, “New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 25, (2021) 251802, arXiv:2109.03116 [hep-ph].
  84. K. Griest and D. Seckel, “Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,” Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3191–3203.
  85. J. R. Ellis, T. Falk, and K. A. Olive, “Neutralino - Stau coannihilation and the cosmological upper limit on the mass of the lightest supersymmetric particle,” Phys.Lett.B 444 (1998) 367–372, arXiv:hep-ph/9810360 [hep-ph].
  86. S. Profumo and C. Yaguna, “Gluino coannihilations and heavy bino dark matter,” Phys.Rev.D 69 (2004) 115009, arXiv:hep-ph/0402208 [hep-ph].
  87. C. Boehm, A. Djouadi, and M. Drees, “Light scalar top quarks and supersymmetric dark matter,” Phys.Rev.D 62 (2000) 035012, arXiv:hep-ph/9911496 [hep-ph].
  88. H. Baer et al., “Exploring the BWCA (bino-wino co-annihilation) scenario for neutralino dark matter,” JHEP 12 (2005) 011, arXiv:hep-ph/0511034 [hep-ph].
  89. G. H. Duan, K.-I. Hikasa, J. Ren, L. Wu, and J. M. Yang, “Probing bino-wino coannihilation dark matter below the neutrino floor at the LHC,” Phys.Rev.D 98 no. 1, (2018) 015010, arXiv:1804.05238 [hep-ph].
  90. M. Reig, D. Restrepo, J. W. F. Valle, and O. Zapata, “Bound-state dark matter with Majorana neutrinos,” Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 303–307, arXiv:1806.09977 [hep-ph].
  91. D. M. Barreiros, R. G. Felipe, and F. R. Joaquim, “Combining texture zeros with a remnant CP symmetry in the minimal type-I seesaw,” JHEP 01 (2019) 223, arXiv:1810.05454 [hep-ph].
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up