Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

CSM-H-R: A Context Modeling Framework in Supporting Reasoning Automation for Interoperable Intelligent Systems and Privacy Protection

Published 21 Aug 2023 in cs.AI, cs.SY, and eess.SY | (2308.11066v3)

Abstract: The automation of High-Level Context (HLC) reasoning across intelligent systems at scale is imperative because of the unceasing accumulation of contextual data, the trend of the fusion of data from multiple sources (e.g., sensors, intelligent systems), and the intrinsic complexity and dynamism of context-based decision-making processes. To mitigate the challenges posed by these issues, we propose a novel Hierarchical Ontology-State Modeling (HOSM) framework CSM-H-R, which programmatically combines ontologies and states at the modeling phase and runtime phase for attaining the ability to recognize meaningful HLC. It builds on the model of our prior work on the Context State Machine (CSM) engine by incorporating the H (Hierarchy) and R (Relationship and tRansition) dimensions to take care of the dynamic aspects of context. The design of the framework supports the sharing and interoperation of context among intelligent systems and the components for handling CSMs and the management of hierarchy, relationship, and transition. Case studies are developed for IntellElevator and IntellRestaurant, two intelligent applications in a smart campus setting. The prototype implementation of the framework experiments on translating the HLC reasoning into vector and matrix computing and presents the potential of using advanced probabilistic models to reach the next level of automation in integrating intelligent systems; meanwhile, privacy protection support is achieved in the application domain by anonymization through indexing and reducing information correlation. An implementation of the framework is available at https://github.com/songhui01/CSM-H-R.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. A. A. Abdellatif, A. Mohamed, C. F. Chiasserini, M. Tlili, and A. Erbad, “Edge computing for smart health: Context-aware approaches, opportunities, and challenges,” IEEE Network, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 196–203, 2019.
  2. E. Batista, M. A. Moncusi, P. López-Aguilar, A. Martínez-Ballesté, and A. Solanas, “Sensors for context-aware smart healthcare: A security perspective,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 20, 2021.
  3. F. Kiani and Ömer Faruk Saraç, “A novel intelligent traffic recovery model for emergency vehicles based on context-aware reinforcement learning,” Information Sciences, vol. 619, pp. 288–309, 2023.
  4. R. Zhu, S. Wu, L. Li, P. Lv, and M. Xu, “Context-aware multiagent broad reinforcement learning for mixed pedestrian-vehicle adaptive traffic light control,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 20, pp. 19694–19705, 2022.
  5. S. Chavhan, D. Gupta, B. N. Chandana, A. Khanna, and J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, “Iot-based context-aware intelligent public transport system in a metropolitan area,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 6023–6034, 2020.
  6. S. Yue, S. Yue, and R. Smith, “A survey of testing context-aware software: challenges and resolution,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP), p. 102, The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer …, 2016.
  7. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991.
  8. Q. Deng and D. Söffker, “A review of hmm-based approaches of driving behaviors recognition and prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2021.
  9. N. Deepa, B. Prabadevi, P. K. Maddikunta, T. R. Gadekallu, T. Baker, M. A. Khan, and U. Tariq, “An ai-based intelligent system for healthcare analysis using ridge-adaline stochastic gradient descent classifier,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 77, pp. 1998–2017, 2021.
  10. E. Adi, A. Anwar, Z. Baig, and S. Zeadally, “Machine learning and data analytics for the iot,” Neural computing and applications, vol. 32, pp. 16205–16233, 2020.
  11. Z. Ning, P. Dong, X. Wang, J. J. Rodrigues, and F. Xia, “Deep reinforcement learning for vehicular edge computing: An intelligent offloading system,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1–24, 2019.
  12. A. M. Khattak, N. Akbar, M. Aazam, T. Ali, A. M. Khan, S. Jeon, M. Hwang, and S. Lee, “Context representation and fusion: Advancements and opportunities,” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 9628–9668, 2014.
  13. S. van Engelenburg, M. Janssen, and B. Klievink, “Designing context-aware systems: A method for understanding and analysing context in practice,” Journal of logical and algebraic methods in programming, vol. 103, pp. 79–104, 2019.
  14. S. Jabbar, F. Ullah, S. Khalid, M. Khan, and K. Han, “Semantic interoperability in heterogeneous iot infrastructure for healthcare,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2017, 2017.
  15. A. Cimmino, M. Poveda-Villalón, and R. García-Castro, “ewot: A semantic interoperability approach for heterogeneous iot ecosystems based on the web of things,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 822, 2020.
  16. C. Bettini and D. Riboni, “Privacy protection in pervasive systems: State of the art and technical challenges,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 17, pp. 159–174, 2015. 10 years of Pervasive Computing’ In Honor of Chatschik Bisdikian.
  17. E. de Matos, R. T. Tiburski, C. R. Moratelli, S. Johann Filho, L. A. Amaral, G. Ramachandran, B. Krishnamachari, and F. Hessel, “Context information sharing for the internet of things: A survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 166, p. 106988, 2020.
  18. D. C. Nguyen, P. N. Pathirana, M. Ding, and A. Seneviratne, “Blockchain for secure ehrs sharing of mobile cloud based e-health systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 66792–66806, 2019.
  19. S. Yue and R. K. Smith, “Applying context state machines to smart elevators: Design, implementation and evaluation,” in 2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 1–9, IEEE, 2021.
  20. A. Pliatsios, K. Kotis, and C. Goumopoulos, “A systematic review on semantic interoperability in the ioe-enabled smart cities,” Internet of Things, vol. 22, p. 100754, 2023.
  21. V.-H. Hoang, E. Lehtihet, and Y. Ghamri-Doudane, “Privacy-preserving blockchain-based data sharing platform for decentralized storage systems,” in 2020 IFIP Networking Conference (Networking), pp. 280–288, 2020.
  22. Y. Songhui, Y. Songqing, and S. Randy, “A state-based approach to context modeling and computing,” IEEE Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, 2017.
  23. A. Bousdekis, N. Papageorgiou, B. Magoutas, D. Apostolou, and G. Mentzas, “A probabilistic model for context-aware proactive decision making,” in 2016 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2016.
  24. A. Bucchiarone, A. Marconi, M. Pistore, and H. Raik, “A context-aware framework for dynamic composition of process fragments in the internet of services,” Journal of Internet Services and Applications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2017.
  25. H. Chegini and A. Mahanti, “A framework of automation on context-aware internet of things (iot) systems,” pp. 157–162, 12 2019.
  26. E. Williams and J. Gray, “Contextion: A framework for developing context-aware mobile applications,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Mobile Development Lifecycle, MobileDeLi ’14, (New York, NY, USA), p. 27–31, Association for Computing Machinery, 2014.
  27. R. Bergmann, L. Grumbach, L. Malburg, and C. Zeyen, “Procake: A process-oriented case-based reasoning framework.,” in ICCBR Workshops, vol. 2567, pp. 156–161, 2019.
  28. L. Rodriguez-Benitez, J. Moreno-Garcia, J. Castro-Schez, C. Solana, and L. Jimenez, “Action recognition in video sequences using a mealy machine,” International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1383–1389, 2008.
  29. T. Teixeira, D. Jung, G. Dublon, and A. Savvides, “Recognizing activities from context and arm pose using finite state machines,” in 2009 Third ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC), pp. 1–8, IEEE, 2009.
  30. D. A. Lambert, “A blueprint for higher-level fusion systems,” Information Fusion, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–24, 2009.
  31. S. Meyer and A. Rakotonirainy, “A survey of research on context-aware homes,” in Proceedings of the Australasian information security workshop conference on ACSW frontiers 2003-Volume 21, pp. 159–168, 2003.
  32. T. Van Nguyen and D. Choi, “Context reasoning using contextual graph,” in 2008 IEEE 8th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology Workshops, pp. 488–493, IEEE, 2008.
  33. I. Portugal, P. Alencar, and D. Cowan, “The use of machine learning algorithms in recommender systems: A systematic review,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 97, pp. 205–227, 2018.
  34. H. Seo, J. Park, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Semantics-native communication via contextual reasoning,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 604–617, 2023.
  35. F. Mourchid, J. B. Othman, A. Kobbane, E. Sabir, and M. El Koutbi, “A markov chain model for integrating context in recommender systems,” in 2016 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2016.
  36. J. Hong, E.-H. Suh, J. Kim, and S. Kim, “Context-aware system for proactive personalized service based on context history,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 7448–7457, 2009.
  37. A. kishore Ramakrishnan, D. Preuveneers, and Y. Berbers, “Enabling self-learning in dynamic and open iot environments,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 32, pp. 207–214, 2014. The 5th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT-2014), the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Information Technology (SEIT-2014).
  38. J. W. Lee and A. Helal, “Modeling and reasoning of contexts in smart spaces based on stochastic analysis of sensor data,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 2452, 2022.
  39. M. Gheisari, H. Najafabadi, J. Alzubi, J. Gao, G. Wang, A. Abbasi, and A. Castiglione, “Obpp: An ontology-based framework for privacy-preserving in iot-based smart city,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 123, 04 2021.
  40. P. C. M. Arachchige, P. Bertok, I. Khalil, D. Liu, S. Camtepe, and M. Atiquzzaman, “A trustworthy privacy preserving framework for machine learning in industrial iot systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 6092–6102, 2020.
  41. S. Ji, J. He, A. S. Uluagac, R. Beyah, and Y. Li, “Cell-based snapshot and continuous data collection in wireless sensor networks,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–29, 2013.
  42. B. Hidasi and D. Tikk, “Approximate modeling of continuous context in factorization algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Context-Awareness in Retrieval and Recommendation, pp. 3–9, 2014.
  43. A. Padovitz, S. W. Loke, A. Zaslavsky, B. Burg, and C. Bartolini, “An approach to data fusion for context awareness,” in International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context, pp. 353–367, Springer, 2005.
  44. S. Yue and R. K. Smith, “Applying context state machines to smart elevators: Design, implementation and evaluation,” in 2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 1–9, 2021.
  45. Y. Vaizman, K. Ellis, and G. Lanckriet, “Recognizing detailed human context in the wild from smartphones and smartwatches,” IEEE pervasive computing, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 62–74, 2017.
  46. H. Alemdar, H. Ertan, O. D. Incel, and C. Ersoy, “Aras human activity datasets in multiple homes with multiple residents,” in 2013 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops, pp. 232–235, 2013.
  47. J. Bhogal and P. Moore, “Towards object-oriented context modeling: Object-oriented relational database data storage,” in 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, pp. 542–547, IEEE, 2014.
  48. J.-H. Kim and B.-R. Moon, “Adaptive elevator group control with cameras,” IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 377–382, 2001.
  49. D. Venu, A. Mayuri, S. Neelakandan, G. Murthy, N. Arulkumar, and N. Shelke, “An efficient low complexity compression based optimal homomorphic encryption for secure fiber optic communication,” Optik, vol. 252, p. 168545, 2022.
  50. E. Pintelas, I. E. Livieris, and P. Pintelas, “A grey-box ensemble model exploiting black-box accuracy and white-box intrinsic interpretability,” Algorithms, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 17, 2020.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up